Lol Canadians. Good luck stupid cucks.
https://twitter.com/ezralevant/statu...20783596269568
|
-
11-16-2020, 01:08 AM #1
-
11-16-2020, 01:35 AM #2
-
11-16-2020, 01:45 AM #3
https://greatreset.com/
https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-e...adical-plan-to
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset
https://time.com/collection/great-reset/
You will own nothing, rent everything, have zero privacy and be happy about it.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/...-what-that-is/
Biden 2020
MAGA Cult Get Fuct
Voted blue no matter who
Losers got trolled.
-
11-16-2020, 01:49 AM #4
-
-
11-16-2020, 01:58 AM #5
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,072
- Rep Power: 28441
-
11-16-2020, 02:00 AM #6
-
11-16-2020, 02:08 AM #7
-
11-16-2020, 02:09 AM #8
-
-
11-16-2020, 02:12 AM #9
-
11-16-2020, 02:13 AM #10
-
11-16-2020, 02:19 AM #11
-
11-16-2020, 03:21 AM #12
-
-
11-16-2020, 04:37 AM #13
-
11-16-2020, 04:41 AM #14
-
11-16-2020, 04:47 AM #15
A financial web sight I visit was discussing this recently. As he mentions ~
https://www.billionairesportfolio.com/archives/7112
This daily note, which I've been writing for almost five years, is about connecting dots.
I talk a lot about markets, geopolitics, economics and even psychology. I do so, because without the understanding of how all of these things work together, it's impossible to have an accurate view on markets or the world.
I don't wait for the nightly news on a big network to tell me what's happening on these fronts. I don't rely on CNBC or the Wall Street Journal. I like to hear or see it directly from primary sources (press conferences, speeches, data, actions). That, in combination with the information in the prices of markets, I get the real news.
With that, I've talked a lot about China over the past five years, the rise and the related threat. I've talked a lot about Trump, and his role as a necessary disrupter in an economy that was teetering on the edge of depression, following eight years of economic malaise and Fed intervention. I've talked a lot about the Fed, and its role in keeping the economic patient alive, following the Global Financial Crisis. I've talked a lot about big tech, and the threat the "disruption" represents to the economy and society. I've talked a lot about the massive globally coordinated investment to fight climate change — the climate actioners. I've talked a lot about the virus, and the propaganda surrounding it (from the selective reporting metrics to the imagery of Chinese officials welding Wuhan residents into their apartments). And I've talked a lot about the battles on Capitol Hill, and the election.
These are all dots that have created a pretty clear "big picture" along the way.
It was all about structural reform — the important change needed so that the global economy could sustainably emerge from the damage of the global financial crisis. Trump took the lead (globally) when he came into office, making a lot of tough and unpopular moves in that direction. And with that, it quickly became all about Trump.
Why did the big picture become all about Trump?
As we've discussed, Trump has represented an existential threat 1) to the Chinese Communist Party, 2) to the global climate action plan, and 3) to the careers of entrenched politicians.
Solving that problem became priority, above all else. It dominated the Davos meetings in January this year. They didn’t hide it. It was about Trump (anti-Trump). Not the global economy. Not even climate change.
To what extent would they go to, to get rid of him? Whatever it takes.
Again, if you connect the dots, we see a pretty clear picture. We have a virus that has derailed a strong economy — an economy that was positioned to produce the best growth we've seen since the late 90s boom — heading into an election year.
And we get a virus, from China, a little more than a month after Trump forces the Chinese Communist Party into a "fair-trade" agreement that would be economically game-changing (negatively) for China. The WHO (Foreign Policy Journal calls it “China’s Coronavirus Accomplice”) was "boots on the ground" in China, evaluating a virus for more than two months, and watching it spread across the world before they finally relented and called it a pandemic (which sets into motion domestic government responses).
And then we have U.S. government and agency infighting and contradictory messaging over basic facts about the virus — all along the way. And despite finding clear and effective treatment protocols in New York in early April (as data showed in the declining intubation data in New York hospitals), the virus timeline was drawn-out, and became an effective political tool to leverage, which ultimately translated into massively altered election protocols (via mail-in voting). So, not only did the virus influence the election indirectly (via the economy), it influenced the election directly.
Now, with all of this in mind, we continue to connect the dots.
So, coming into the election, I said "in the case of a Biden win, and split Congress, I suspect he may hold the economy hostage, through tighter virus mitigation, so that the Republican-led Senate will relent and do a second stimulus package (which will fund the clean energy plan).
Here we are. Biden's coronavirus advisor talked yesterday about the strategy of a 4-6 week lockdown "to crush the virus." Since the election, Massachusetts and New York have already ramped up restrictions. And today, Chicago issued stay-at-home orders. We should expect this to build, and very likely from Democrat-led cities and states. The pressure will become intense, helped by the media, for the Republican-led Senate to fold to the demands of the Pelosi/Biden clean energy fund which is packaged as a "relief fund." This isn’t a political view (save your emails). This is a paying attention view.
-
11-16-2020, 05:07 AM #16
-
-
11-16-2020, 05:14 AM #17
He was the only candidate willing to fight illegal immigration. His economic polices make sense, and have been proven effective since his election. He puts America first instead of globalist agendas like the Paris Accord, TPP, etc.
Now tell us what you like about Biden.^^Former 300+lb Crew^^
WWPB2D
Nothing worthwile is ever easy.
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
-
11-16-2020, 05:15 AM #18
-
11-16-2020, 05:26 AM #19
How did he “fight” illegal immigration, besides shutting down the government because congress wouldn’t give him ludicrous amounts of money to build a wall?
Which economic policies in particular?
How does America benefit from leaving the Paris accord and TPP?
In your own words, what exactly is America First?
I don’t like Biden. I think he’s over the hill and too centrist for my liking. However, I’m pretty sure the Democrats ran him because:
1. Black people associate him with Obama
2. He’s not gonna freak out old white voters as much as a homosexual like Pete or a socialist like Bernie or a black chick like KamalaThe best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter
-Winston Churchill
-
11-16-2020, 05:35 AM #20
lol, of course you can't think of any positives to Biden, and then you want me to elaborate further?
But since it's an easy question, lowered the corporate and personal tax rates. Imposed tariffs on China. Renegotiated or vacated trade deals that are unfavorable to the US.
Toughened asylum policies, upgraded and built more border wall, remain in Mexico policy, attempted to end DACA, working to end H1B lottery and make them more stringent, etc.^^Former 300+lb Crew^^
WWPB2D
Nothing worthwile is ever easy.
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
-
-
11-16-2020, 05:43 AM #21
-
11-16-2020, 05:48 AM #22
I didn’t come in here making any claims that I may be called on to back up.
Besides paying a little bit less in payroll taxes, what exactly about this do you like?
The income the government loses in these tax cuts, does it get replaced, or is Trump filling in the gaps with all of his own wealth?
Can you elaborate?
Which trade deals are you talking about here and how were they “renegotiated” in order to benefit America?
Since he cut everyone’s taxes, where’d the money come from for all this?
Did he do anything about large food/manufacturing/farming conglomerates hiring illegal immigrants?Last edited by Skwidward; 11-16-2020 at 06:35 AM.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter
-Winston Churchill
-
11-16-2020, 05:48 AM #23
-
11-16-2020, 05:53 AM #24
-
-
11-16-2020, 05:55 AM #25
The TPP is one of the most unfairly vilified agreements in modern times. It was carefully constructed by actual experts over a 10 year period that overlaps both the Bush and Obama administrations specifically to control Chinese economic hegemony in the Pacific rim. So at the same time that Trump was campaigning in 2016 on waging economic warfare against the evil Chinese enemy, he was trashing the agreement among the Pacific rim countries precisely designed to limit Chinese economic power. The TPP should have been one of the centerpieces of the Trump strategy to control the Chinese, but since (1) he's not capable of understanding complex issues at more than a very thin superficial level and (2) he didn't create it so in his mind it sucked because only he is capable of solving the world's problems, his knee jerk reaction was to trash it.
-
11-16-2020, 05:58 AM #26
-
11-16-2020, 06:04 AM #27
-
11-16-2020, 06:25 AM #28
How about not only did I not list off a bunch of stuff I don't really understand in an attempt to explain why I like Biden, but I even stated that I don't like Biden.
I get it. Someone asks you why you like Trump. You don't really wanna admit that you think he's a big tough guy wrapped in an American flag, so you rattle off terms like "legislation" and "policy," but are unable to explain what you mean when you do so.
It's embarrassing. I'm not judging you. I'm here to help. We can get through this together.
We can end the Biden discussion right here.
Is Biden gonna do what things? "Legislation" and "policy"?
-Dunno. Don't care. I was asking you questions about why you like Trump.
I understand that being put on the spot and being unable to explain what you're actually talking about is embarrassing when you don't really understand what it is you're saying.
Would you like to continue and maybe start throwing childish name-calling insults at me?
EDIT: Let it all out, bud. It's ok. this is a safe space.
I know this is a hard time for you given the projected election results and all.Last edited by Skwidward; 11-16-2020 at 06:39 AM.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter
-Winston Churchill
-
-
11-16-2020, 07:54 AM #29
-
11-16-2020, 08:06 AM #30
Bookmarks