Am I the only person that thinks letting in 100,000 Syrian refugees into USA by 2017

[DicedPineapples]

why do they have to cave in to political pressure? Are we just not allowed to say "No, we're not taking refugees" <----a safer decision for our country, why endanger it?

Of course they're allowed to say that. But do you honestly think they're going to?

[Bishamon]

what exactly are these people going to do here? i doubt they have any skills or know how to speak english.

Syrians actually speak english and, once again, are a well educated minority group

[thercias]

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...-them-20151114

"After Paris Attacks, Don't Close Doors to Refugees – Open Them:The West should do everything in its power to make those fleeing ISIS and extremism feel welcome and wanted"

Liberals are shooting themselves in the foot. People are eventually going to start getting tired of their bs.

[project3]

just send them to a no man's land.. ex... death valley... give them camping gear.. like the syrians never left home

[DicedPineapples]

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...-them-20151114

"After Paris Attacks, Don't Close Doors to Refugees – Open Them:The West should do everything in its power to make those fleeing ISIS and extremism feel welcome and wanted"

Liberals are shooting themselves in the foot. People are eventually going to start getting tired of their bs.

Wait... you live in Detroit and are worried about a few refugees? You're far more likely to get killed by another American.

[Mwizzle]

Of course they're allowed to say that. But do you honestly think they're going to?

nah....we bout to get cucked fam

[TurkeyMan1992]

As much as I hate the fact of rejecting the 99.99% of the good and innocent refugees, I think it what has to be done. That 0.01% can and will cause alot of damage, that 0.01% will connect with other ISIS sympathizers and will unleash a well planned attack that will kill many. It such a sad situation for the innocent, but its the truth. Rich middle eastern countries need to take them or atleast other countries that are not associated with the funding of Israel need to step up and accept them

[thercias]

Wait... you live in Detroit and are worried about a few refugees? You're far more likely to get killed by another American.

my location has nothing to do with this, and this issue is far bigger than refugees. europe is getting destroyed and the PC media is going full retard on the problems with islam in the global world. it's more about addressing the issues with islam, admitting there's a connection with it's religious texts and the barbaric beliefs a large percentage of muslim have. a religion can't be reformed if liberals keep denying there's a problem with the religion and calls everyone a bigot for doing so.

[SoThisIsFun]

White (and black) people arent having enough children...u need to keep a healthy labour force...America is gonna welcome 100k syrians with open arms.

Its the new world order baby, get used to it. Not like either of us make the rules.

I'm accepting the fact the entire world will eventually become Islamic.

It seems to be where we're going

That's why I'm going to marry an Indian girl and let me tell you, we will produce many offspring and it will actually be a great thing.

Brb:
-Indian population is 1.3 billion (80% Hindu)
-They all look out for each other (ones living in US) and have a tight Indian bond that can potentially combat the "religion of peace" population
-Eat curry and wipe ass with hand (alpha)
-Hopefully my male children won't be short...this is a legit fear but it's a risk I'm willing to take

[7rmr]

750,000 refugees have come to the US since 9/11 and not one has been involved in a terrorist attack.

Why come to the US using the process with the most security screening possible? Why not just over-stay a traveler's visa? Seems like excessive effort when there are much easier ways to get into the US.

[Fairplay]

Are there any refugees going to Australia? Jw.

Australia are taking in 12 000 of them.

[SYKO227]

I

The rich arab countries should be taking in refugees but theyre not.

What happened to helping fellow muslims?

But then the roads will be so full that they won't have room to drive their Lambos and Ferraris.

Let alone be able to change two tires while driving.

[trytoliftyoung]

As much as I hate the fact of rejecting the 99.99% of the good and innocent refugees, I think it what has to be done. That 0.01% can and will cause alot of damage, that 0.01% will connect with other ISIS sympathizers and will unleash a well planned attack that will kill many. It such a sad situation for the innocent, but its the truth. Rich middle eastern countries need to take them or atleast other countries that are not associated with the funding of Israel need to step up and accept them

I completely agree. America needs to be selfish and look out for themselves in this matter. We need to think logically and rationally, and not let our emotions take over. Logically, it is a far safer and smart decision to simply not let them in. It makes so much sense on a national security level that there really is no doubt. Liberals and the "think of the women and children!!!" just has no thought behind it plain and simple.

[S0Jack3d]

750,000 refugees have come to the US since 9/11 and not one has been involved in a terrorist attack.

Why come to the US using the process with the most security screening possible? Why not just over-stay a traveler's visa? Seems like excessive effort when there are much easier ways to get into the US.

they just arrived in paris and already killed 130 people.

[DicedPineapples]

they just arrived in paris and already killed 130 people.

Do you even read the news? Four of the eight suspected attackers were French citizens and three were from Belgium. Only one had a Syrian passport.

[7rmr]

they just arrived in paris and already killed 130 people.

After being screened in Greece...

Pretty sure Greece isnt going to be screening immigrants coming to the US.

[7rmr]

I completely agree. America needs to be selfish and look out for themselves in this matter. We need to think logically and rationally, and not let our emotions take over. Logically, it is a far safer and smart decision to simply not let them in. It makes so much sense on a national security level that there really is no doubt. Liberals and the "think of the women and children!!!" just has no thought behind it plain and simple.

Actually, letting in Syrian refugees works against the message ISIS puts out to new recruits. It shows that (1) the US/West is not evil and that (2) the supposed caliphate created by ISIS is not actually a caliphate since Muslims are fleeing from it.

Considering combating ISIS's ability to recruit is just as important as actually killing ISIS members (they are recruiting at a rate roughly equal to the rate they are being killed) then letting in refugees is actually an important part of the fight against ISIS.

[TurkeyMan1992]

Actually, letting in Syrian refugees works against the message ISIS puts out to new recruits. It shows that (1) the US/West is not evil and that (2) the supposed caliphate created by ISIS is not actually a caliphate since Muslims are fleeing from it.

Considering combating ISIS's ability to recruit is just as important as actually killing ISIS members (they are recruiting at a rate roughly equal to the rate they are being killed) then letting in refugees is actually an important part of the fight against ISIS.

As long as we are close allies to Israel, they will consider us evil.

[DicedPineapples]

Actually, letting in Syrian refugees works against the message ISIS puts out to new recruits. It shows that (1) the US/West is not evil and that (2) the supposed caliphate created by ISIS is not actually a caliphate since Muslims are fleeing from it.

Considering combating ISIS's ability to recruit is just as important as actually killing ISIS members (they are recruiting at a rate roughly equal to the rate they are being killed) then letting in refugees is actually an important part of the fight against ISIS.

Too much truth for most miscers to handle. People itt don't even seem willing to accept that so far the evidence suggests this attack was carried out primarily by French citizens and Belgian nationals. But why acknowledge that when you can just blame the refugees?

[flexnation]

Can't believe you *******s are scared of some women and children coming from half the planet away.

You really think terrorists going to use the guise of immigration to get into the country to cause a terrorist attack? The US intelligence agencies are far more complex than the european. We have 88 guns per 100 citizens.

The funny part is you let these "terrorists" terrorize you into changing your lifestyle. Let them try some **** here. People die every day from shootings in america.

They wouldn't kill more than 10 or 20 people most.

Also you think people will somehow sneak in with a few extra refugees. These people are not planning some mass conspiracy distraction using refugees. If they wanted in they'd already be here or else they aren't getting in.

They went after France because it was ****ing easy. They obviously would rather hit the home of the free but couldn't manage it and preyed on the weak instead.

Urine Idiot.

Edit: You know what, 7rmr makes a lot of sense. Im still not keen on the idea of letting 100k immigrants in here especially if 75% of them are men. Id rather be on the safe side when it comes to this. This coming from a full blooded Syrian who's entire family migrated here about 40 years ago. Every Syrian i talk to living here is against the idea as well.

[Fairplay]

People itt don't even seem willing to accept that so far the evidence suggests this attack was carried out primarily by French citizens and Belgian nationals. But why acknowledge that when you can just blame the refugees?

France & the UK have been letting in north african and ME immigrants for years. There are a lot of angry and disgruntled immigrants and 2nd generations living in France right now. This didn't just happen over night.

[jujuB]

i dont get why they didn't go to asia...

they have to cross a whole got damn ocean to get here. lol

[DicedPineapples]

France & the UK have been letting in north african and ME immigrants for years. There are a lot of angry and disgruntled immigrants and 2nd generations living in France right now. This didn't just happen over night.

I realize that but a lot of people ITT don't seem to and are acting as though this attack was carried out by members of the current crop of Syrian refugees when that is not at all the case. For example, this guy:

they just arrived in paris and already killed 130 people.

[TurkeyMan1992]

I realize that but a lot of people ITT don't seem to and are acting as though this attack was carried out by members of the current crop of Syrian refugees when that is not at all the case. For example, this guy:

It's been confirmed that 1 of the members was a Syrian refugee.

It doesnt matter if it's 1 Syrian refugee or 100 Syrian refugees that are in ISIS. As long as they get through that border, they will connect with other ISIS members/sympathizers and they will launch an attack. This isn't some careless act, it's ****ing heartbreaking, but the USA has to look out of the safety of it's people first before we look out for the safety of others.

[hardgainersrs]

Is a horrible idea? Yes, 99% of those refugees are probably innocent people affected by war, but how well can we screen them? If even ONE of those refugees turns out to be a militant or ISIS supporter and hurts American citizens, it is a massive failure that could have been prevented.

I'm not sure of it's legitimacy, but I read a statistic that 70% of the refugee pool is young men of military age.

Do you really believe ISIS would not take advantage of the situation and send in extremists and supporters of their cause that could pass a thorough screening?

In light of the Paris attacks and the fact that one of the militants had a Syrian passport and was booked in Greece, this is almost a certainty.

It blows my mind that our government would not see this and adjust following the recent attacks.
Not a fan of the "****in liberals" or libs gonna lib type of hate but many proclaimed liberal/progressive people at school and on social media insist that the government will be competent enough with their vetting and processing, but I find this ridiculous.

It pisses me off that the world basically assumes every country should take hundreds of thousands of refugees without any protest. A certain world organization insisted that 100,000 by 2017 "wasn't enough". Honestly, I usually get a lot of hate for this at school but I really believe the refugees aren't this countries problem, we should be focused on the safety and wellbeing of Americans and every other countries people should be a lesser priority.

Don't get me wrong, I feel bad for the refugees and it is a horrible tragedy but even potentially putting Americans at risk is a horrible idea and should not happen.


I'm on mobile and don't feel like posting links but let's have a discussion.

I agree %100


honestly think a large % of people in north america think the same way

[DicedPineapples]

It's been confirmed that 1 of the members was a Syrian refugee.

It doesnt matter if it's 1 Syrian refugee or 100 Syrian refugees that are in ISIS. As long as they get through that border, they will connect with other ISIS members/sympathizers and they will launch an attack. This isn't some careless act, it's ****ing heartbreaking, but the USA has to look out of the safety of it's people first before we look out for the safety of others.

1 was a Syrian refugee, 4 were French citizens and 3 were Belgian-born French nationals. Should we ban all French muslims from coming to the US as well? I agree with the overall sentiment of your post but to outright blame the all of the refugees for this attack is a little disingenuous.

[swolnado]

It's been confirmed that 1 of the members was a Syrian refugee.

It doesnt matter if it's 1 Syrian refugee or 100 Syrian refugees that are in ISIS. As long as they get through that border, they will connect with other ISIS members/sympathizers and they will launch an attack. This isn't some careless act, it's ****ing heartbreaking, but the USA has to look out of the safety of it's people first before we look out for the safety of others.

It's not who we are.

With this logic we might as well put all Syrians into internment camps because they might be close to Syrian refuges and isis affiliates.

This strategy worked out so well for us with the Japanese in ww2. Look up the 442 combat regiment.

This is just politicians making a knee jerk reaction and using it to their advantage to make themselves look good.

There's no guarantee of 100k refugees coming and even that is a drop in the bucket. Do people actually wake up and get concerned about this when you wake up?

These politicians are a ****ing joke and playing off people's emotions. There is no more threat than there has been for america. We have been universally hated by terrorist groups for a longtime.

[Discworlder]

Canada is supposed to take in 25K by Christmas. I'd rather have 25K Mexicans instead srs. America doesn't seem to want more. And out of all our immigrant groups, hispanics are almost non-existant. We got enough arabs and muslims - time to let someone else have a shot if we want to be generous. At least hispanics are Christian and partly native to the Americas, and they can shovel snow in winter while they wait for lawn mowing season.

[TooAnabolic]

I watched a video recently where a Muslim woman was asking some irrelevant attention seeking question and a high authority woman (forget who she was, maybe someone can link the video) brought up that it's irrelevant that the majority of Islamist Muslims are peaceful, because TWENTY FIVE PERCENT of them were radicals.

In other words, 25,000 of those Muslims are terrorists or potential terrorists.

[PrimeraRS]

I think the question that really needs to be asked here is that, will the women look like this?