your "evidence" is nothing of the sort.
the majority of people with big legs have built them through squatting. Other exercises contribute to that, but that does not minimize the importance of squatting.
this is honestly one of the dumber debates I've seen.
my personal opinion is that squats are the single most difficult exercise to replace. nothing else has done as much for my legs. if something else did, i'd gladly stop because squatting blows.
|
-
03-29-2012, 11:30 AM #31Who was this love of yours?
-
03-29-2012, 11:30 AM #32
drop to peer pressure?!!haha
thats funny.ok u dont have to do squats .are u ok now?
but dont tell me theres no eveidence when the 80 % of muscle mass is contracting during the movement.heck the squat has even aerobic benefits of working all this mass.but u can do whatever u want to.if u can find a way around this u are good to go but its so diff to find one.i myself stopped to deadlift and now i feel so guilty lol.never do that again.
-
-
03-29-2012, 11:30 AM #33
-
03-29-2012, 11:31 AM #34
-
03-29-2012, 11:32 AM #35
-
03-29-2012, 11:33 AM #36
-
-
03-29-2012, 11:33 AM #37
-
03-29-2012, 11:44 AM #38
Nah, my powers of deduction clearly prove my point. You just simply have no real counter-argument.
Which oddly enough proves my point that people do squats out of influence or habit. It's clear how you became offended just because I questioned an exercise you were found of, without really giving any real evidence one way or the other.--------------
You can lose weight but you can't gain common sense - that stuff if genetic!
-
03-29-2012, 11:49 AM #39
-
03-29-2012, 11:54 AM #40
No, there was no evidence presented. I gave the only real life example of squats =/= leg gains. The Bulgarian weightlifter training program is very well documented and so are the results.
I didn't see a link to a study or a real life example of people gaining massive sizes by doing squats only, yet everyone here so far jumps to claim that it has been the biggest reason for their leg gains...It just doesn't make sense.--------------
You can lose weight but you can't gain common sense - that stuff if genetic!
-
-
03-29-2012, 11:58 AM #41
-
03-29-2012, 11:59 AM #42
You posted random pictures of select lifters that you found on Google.
Weight lifters do not train for the same purposes as bodybuilders.
We don't need to show you any f*cking studies. Bodybuilders have been using squats since the invention of the barbell. The results speak for themselves. You are just refusing to open your eyes.
-
03-29-2012, 11:59 AM #43
-
03-29-2012, 12:00 PM #44
-
-
03-29-2012, 12:02 PM #45
-
03-29-2012, 12:05 PM #46
-
03-29-2012, 12:06 PM #47
My point exactly.
"Don't care about studies, people been doin it"
You won't find studies to show me because there are none that prove your point. If you ask anyone who is willing to approach the subject with a cool head why they do squats, they would answer "for strength".--------------
You can lose weight but you can't gain common sense - that stuff if genetic!
-
03-29-2012, 12:07 PM #48
-
-
03-29-2012, 12:07 PM #49
-
03-29-2012, 12:08 PM #50
-
03-29-2012, 12:09 PM #51
-
03-29-2012, 12:10 PM #52
-
-
03-29-2012, 12:10 PM #53
-
03-29-2012, 12:11 PM #54
-
03-29-2012, 12:12 PM #55
-
03-29-2012, 12:13 PM #56
-
-
03-29-2012, 12:14 PM #57
-
03-29-2012, 12:16 PM #58
A study by the University of North Dakota compared muscle recruitment during a leg press and a free weight barbell squat lift (5). The study used two groups of subjects. Group 1 was made up of ten untrained, healthy men, and Group 2 was made up of sixteen trained, healthy male athletes (5). The analysis method used was electromyographic (EMG) activity (5). EMG activity was recorded from the erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris (BF) muscles (5). The exercises performed were the leg press and the barbell squat lift (5).
Every subject in Group 1 lifted three repetitions of both exercises using a weight equivalent to their own body weight, which ranged from 155 to 165 lbs. In Group 2, each subject performed three repetitions of both exercises using a weight equivalent to 80% of their 1 RM in both lifts, which ranged from 225 to 600lbs. (5). The results indicated that in Group 2, the trained group, the squat exercise elicited significantly more EMG activity than did the leg press in the ES, GM and BF (5). A significant difference in the VL activity was not observed between the two exercises, but the activity in the VL was still slightly greater (5). In the untrained group, Group 1, the results were almost a reflection of the trained group (5). The leg press utterly failed to recruit the ES, GM or BF to the degree the barbell squat did (5). The quadriceps were slightly more stimulated in the squat than in the leg press.
READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE HERE http://articles.elitefts.com/trainin...letic-prowess/
-
03-29-2012, 12:18 PM #59
LOL, you guys are funny
Engineer_Guy: earth is flat.
me: no, it's not, look at the evidence
Engineer_Guy: don't need science, people knew it for centuries.
STEELxBALLS: you flabby
ThickAsABrick: I don't want to play with you anymore
hahaha, just like elementary school here--------------
You can lose weight but you can't gain common sense - that stuff if genetic!
-
03-29-2012, 12:18 PM #60
Similar Threads
-
MOLECULAR NUTRITION is looking for a few new reps. Wanna join? Apply inside.
By G.W. Hayduke in forum Company PromotionReplies: 203Last Post: 12-05-2006, 06:01 PM -
Calling for X factor testers!! (fish oil friendly this time)
By Phosphate bond in forum Company PromotionReplies: 453Last Post: 10-11-2006, 12:52 PM -
Testers needed for INCINERATE (new thermogenic)
By matpal in forum Company PromotionReplies: 127Last Post: 04-21-2006, 05:16 PM
Bookmarks