BREAKING: Bachmann Pledges to Ban Pornography

[jimbob007]

[jimbob007]

[QUOTE=peace2011;713913121]Human beings have unnecessary flesh or fats because majority of people have guaranteed food and hanging flesh looks dirty.

My understanding says that people who have hanging flesh they are more likely to be attacked by dangerous animals because animals target heavy body which has more flesh.

Also if you observe tribal people they do not have perfect body figure because they have to work hard for a living.

If you have free time and you develop good body shape and you show off, this is wrong.

[Streetbull]

I hope her campaign bus catches on fire and explodes. I'm sick of these religious idiots.

This idea of clamping down on porn is a symptom of something much worse -- our society is becoming daily more restricitve of everyone's freedom. Governments not only make war with each other but are declaring war on their own citizens.

[Streetbull]

Terrorists kill people immediately whereas porn and prostitution kill billions of people everyday for 20 to 30 years and ultimately people die horrible deaths.

Terrorists are better than porn and prostitutes.

Many years back I saw a TV program where a man was speaking to 40 prostitutes and he said "together we will rule this world".

Today porn and prostitution is ruling majority of world people because Bush and Obama did nothing on day one of their president job. So today the whole world is begging for money because money is the root cause of all the sins and evils in the world society.

God is punishing USA and 192 countries severely.

Money is how humans engage in trade. The alternative is to beg or steal from each other. Is that what you want?

[TH3SHR3DD3R]

Reading the language of the 'bill,' I am seeing that she, as well as these other signers, intend that children and women be protected from being coerced or forced into 'all forms of pornography' - and, please, keep in mind that I see Bachmann as nothing more than another pretty, inflammatory political mouthpiece, so I'm not supporting her - but nonetheless, like so many noble intentions, I see flaws in her, and their, thinking.

First of all, they only pledge to protect 'women and children' - and let's not kid ourselves here, people, they mean women and GIRLS. Males and boys are part of the skin trade, too, but because they have penises, our society demands that they enjoy it, regardless of the circumstances that led to their sexual imprisonment. Regardless of their own feelings. Regardless of the suffering, confusion and outright terror they feel.

This leads me to my second point: there are already laws against these things. There are already organizations that combat human trafficking. What their 'bill' amounts to is nothing more than yet another lopsided show of support for humans with vaginas - WHITE humans with vaginas, no doubt. It's a political ploy, not an honest declaration of intent against human sex trafficking.

[Beeewbs]

This idea of clamping down on porn is a symptom of something much worse -- our society is becoming daily more restricitve of everyone's freedom. Governments not only make war with each other but are declaring war on their own citizens.

Herp derp, banning porn is a symptom of government being more restrictive, but banning gay marriage and adoption isn't! Pls go. Quit pretending you love freedom.

[TH3SHR3DD3R]

peace2011: what other human actions and thoughts do you intend to use force of violence, the threat of terrorism, and a maniacal, all-invasive police state to ban? It's Friday, so I'm going to Cold Stone and Five Guys tonight, and I'm thinking about how yummy the ice cream and bacon burger will taste. Should I be imprisoned, perhaps tortured, publicly beheaded and executed, for my gluttony, even though I'm training to be a nurse so I can help people (intending to join Doctors Without Borders when possible and assist them in their work), and I eat a lean, natural, whole foods diet the rest of the week? I'm also going to wear nice clothes when I go out tonight - should I be tied to a stake, flames set to my feet, while someone pours water over my head and torso to keep my alive while I feel the fire consuming my legs because I chose to spend money on something I decided was worth it?

Your ideas are interesting, thought-provoking - your choice of how to achieve such a state for humans is, however, nonetheless ineffective and decidedly goes against the supposed concern you feel for your fellow man.

[Boffothe]

This idea of clamping down on porn is a symptom of something much worse -- our society is becoming daily more restricitve of everyone's freedom. Governments not only make war with each other but are declaring war on their own citizens.

But Sarah supports Bachmann! I thought Sarah loved freedom

[JB05]

Good find, but actually, she did. The language demands to protect the helpless tards of America from "all forms of pornography".



It is a classic religious conservative and liberal tactic, group things only you hate with things everyone hates in the hope that they are received as a whole.

Innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy? Lol. Just lol.

Do you realize that the quote you posted (and that Bachmann signed onto) talks about protecting children from pornography (among other things)? Nowhere do I see the word ban. Nowhere in the Bachmann campaign do I see this logic being applied to society at large. If anyone has actual evidence that she beleives in a porn ban, I'd love to see it so I can drop my support. But if you're going to twist some poorly written pandering crap that she signed to mean something it doesn't, I just gotta LOL at you and the gullible idiots that are taking you at face value ITT

[SteelSS]

The problem is that she is insane. Palin isn't nearly as much of a wackjob as bachmann is, she's just stupid and over her head.

[Rockchalk0420]

lol "Constitutionalist" my ass! She just blew her crediability. (the very little she might have had to start with)

[Beeewbs]

But Sarah supports Bachmann! I thought Sarah loved freedom

hahaha

[Beeewbs]

Do you realize that the quote you posted (and that Bachmann signed onto) talks about protecting children from pornography (among other things)? Nowhere do I see the word ban. Nowhere in the Bachmann campaign do I see this logic being applied to society at large. If anyone has actual evidence that she beleives in a porn ban, I'd love to see it so I can drop my support. But if you're going to twist some poorly written pandering crap that she signed to mean something it doesn't, I just gotta LOL at you and the gullible idiots that are taking you at face value ITT

Actually, it says that they want to protect children AND WOMEN from all porn. How exactly are you going to do that without banning porn, genius?

[VAPlowhorse]

Do you realize that the quote you posted (and that Bachmann signed onto) talks about protecting children from pornography (among other things)? Nowhere do I see the word ban. Nowhere in the Bachmann campaign do I see this logic being applied to society at large. If anyone has actual evidence that she beleives in a porn ban, I'd love to see it so I can drop my support. But if you're going to twist some poorly written pandering crap that she signed to mean something it doesn't, I just gotta LOL at you and the gullible idiots that are taking you at face value ITT

Please come down from Mount Olympus and explain how banning pornography, which is a common goal among religious groups similar in doctrine to those affiliated with the Bachmann family, is not a logical conclusion as to a potential course of action for someone who pledges to uphold the following statement.

Humane protection of women and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy — our next generation of American children — from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.

Of course she didn't say that one of her first actions as POTUS would be to ban porn. That might scare a few sheep off the fake conservative train.

[primetime32]

Bachman was a nutjob whacko well before she signed this pledge. I am not a huge fan of Obama, but I do think he is better than the Republican candidates out there and he is salivating at the thought of her running against him in the presidential election.

[TH3SHR3DD3R]

Sounds to me like this article was poorly written and can be interpreted in many different ways - no doubt this was the preexisting intention of its writers and signers. We should not be surprised. Certainly, it would be simple to make a leap from 'we should protect women and girls from human sex trafficking' to 'we must eradicate pornography in order to protect women and girls from human sex trafficking' . . . as if banning pornography would somehow quell the human need for sex and sexuality. Why don't they ban makeup while they're at it, and skirts, and only allow people to look at underwear in a store behind closed doors, and only the after signing their name and providing ID so that they then can be entered into a sex offender registry and be tracked for their perversions.

It's a political ploy, nothing more. Bachmann doesn't give a rusty brown **** about protecting humans from being forced into sex. I fail to see how the nee and desire to protect humans from sex trafficking ultimately means there should be a crusade against human sexual urges. And yet that is exactly what this article implies.

[Shaymin]

Dumb whore. Hope she is hit by a bus.

[bird72]

lol. I feel the opposite way. Terrorists are less dangerous to freedom than people like you and this crazy wench Bachmann.

Good, when depart your flight to Afghanistan?

[bird72]

Dumb whore. Hope she is hit by a bus.

Thisvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

No one wants to hear your opinion you stupid *******.

[Beeewbs]

Good, when depart your flight to Afghanistan?

That doesn't make any sense. But nothing you say ever does.

[bird72]

That doesn't make any sense. But nothing you say ever does.

tras de anormal, bruto, buaajajjajjajajajjajajaj...

[PataciumEyeOdin]

Tonight, Michele Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann “vows” to “uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman” by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.

Source: thinkprogress.org/politics

When men become weak and useless then women takeover. Michele Bachmann for president. Vote for Michele Bachmann.

There was a powerful mughal king. When enemy attacked his kingdom, the men were scared and they were hiding and not fighting. Then the Muslim women started beating their men and forced them to fight the enemy.

When American men went to fight in World War 1 and 2 then American women took controls of USA.

Today American women must start beating their men and force them to destroy pornography and Obama madness because American men are the weakest in the world and they are getting useless.

sadly she will never make it to office

id be for banning of all porn and many other things, maybe this country would get back on track

[TH3SHR3DD3R]

sadly she will never make it to office

id be for banning of all porn and many other things, maybe this country would get back on track

And then we could get back to the good old days when nobody looked at porn and yet syphilis rates were skyrocketing. Cause of, y'know, all dat dere sexual purity and non-promiscuity and whatnot. That didn't exist. And never has. Anywhere. Ever.

[TH3SHR3DD3R]

Oh, good. They just keep talking and talking.

From the group that created the bill:

"No peer-reviewed empirical science or rational demonstration has ever definitively proven, nor has even shown an overwhelming probability that homosexual preference or behavior is irresistible as a function of genetic determination or other forms of fatalism,"

So it's really about gays. Whowouldathunkit.

From the lovely Mrs. Bachmann:

"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President,"

Ahh, this again. Slaves were better off than modern African-Americans. That will definitely get their vote. Perhaps she should make an argument that slavery also helped men curb their homosexual desires, and kept white families pure and together. And also helped prevent preteen white girls from being sold into sex slavery. Glorious, glorious days, those were.

Quotes taken from RawStory.

[Labello]

If a woman would tell me that watching porn == cheating, I would just laugh in her face, cant take those women serious.

[karas]

Hahah porn is more treasured than drugs/money/liberty

good luck with that crazy lady

I read an article for a study looking at the effects of porn on modern men (don't remember source, probably NPR), the study failed because they couldn't find men who DIDN'T watch porn as a control group, trollololol

[peace2011]

sadly she will never make it to office. id be for banning of all porn and many other things, maybe this country would get back on track

She started the fire. Now strong men will carry the flame and set fire worldwide.

[WMcEnaney]

I know I'm digressing, but when did "fap" become a verb? The dictionary at (http://www.dictionary.reference.com) says that "fap" means "drunk."

[PSToolman]

She started the fire. Now strong men will carry the flame and set fire worldwide.

She didn't start anything. The GOP has been playing "values voters" like a pipe organ on Sunday for years. Bachmann may be sincere in her beliefs, though you will never know for sure, but simple pandering is the only reason she's gotten this far in the party.

[GrokTheCube]

Gotta love those small government, freedom loving conservatives!