Reply
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Reading Labels

  1. #1
    Registered User britt777's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: United States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 74
    Rep Power: 226
    britt777 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    britt777 is offline

    Question Reading Labels

    I have a large bag of russett potatoes
    Label Reads

    Calories 110
    Fat 0
    Carbs 26g
    Protein3g

    Calorie King reads

    Calories 168
    Fat 0.2g
    Carbs 37g
    Protein 4.5g

    How do we know exactly what to go by. Is the label on the bag the most accurate? Should I say are labels ever wrong?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User zmcdole's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: United States
    Age: 40
    Posts: 10,655
    Rep Power: 42452
    zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) zmcdole has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    zmcdole is offline
    The facts may be different from the website to the bag due to the amount being measured. I would just go by whats on the bag.
    1708 total @220 Raw
    Improve my total every time I step on the platform.

    Being a male is a matter of birth. However, being a "man" is a matter of choice.

    Photo in Avi is not current, I'm way fatter now.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    nevigsawkufelgnisaton in10city's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: New York, United States
    Posts: 24,222
    Rep Power: 34134
    in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) in10city has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    in10city is offline
    Originally Posted by britt777 View Post
    I have a large bag of russett potatoes
    Label Reads

    Calories 110
    Fat 0
    Carbs 26g
    Protein3g

    Calorie King reads

    Calories 168
    Fat 0.2g
    Carbs 37g
    Protein 4.5g

    How do we know exactly what to go by. Is the label on the bag the most accurate? Should I say are labels ever wrong?
    The only way to be accurate is to weigh it. Otherwise, you have to guesstimate.
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User sweepone's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Posts: 1,719
    Rep Power: 653
    sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    sweepone is offline
    Originally Posted by britt777 View Post

    How do we know exactly what to go by. Is the label on the bag the most accurate? Should I say are labels ever wrong?

    The gov't allows food companies to be off in their calories on the labels by 20% maximum.

    I would venture to say most companies lower the actual calories by the allowable 20%
    208.50 11-1-11

    203.00 8-31-12

    197.00 1-18-2013
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User fyre500's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Gainesville, Florida, United States
    Age: 38
    Posts: 1,330
    Rep Power: 339
    fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    fyre500 is offline
    Originally Posted by sweepone View Post
    The gov't allows food companies to be off in their calories on the labels by 20% maximum.

    I would venture to say most companies lower the actual calories by the allowable 20%
    Where did you read this? It sounds absolutely ridiculous.

    Brittt, be sure to look at the quantities of both macro counts. Are both sources using the same amount of potatoes?
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User britt777's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: United States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 74
    Rep Power: 226
    britt777 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    britt777 is offline
    I went with the size of the potato being medium size. It sure wasn't small. I guess the best way to get right is to weigh it like stated earlier.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User fyre500's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Gainesville, Florida, United States
    Age: 38
    Posts: 1,330
    Rep Power: 339
    fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50) fyre500 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    fyre500 is offline
    Well both sources should list a weight in grams as well. Compare that.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User sweepone's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Posts: 1,719
    Rep Power: 653
    sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250) sweepone has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    sweepone is offline
    Originally Posted by fyre500 View Post
    Where did you read this? It sounds absolutely ridiculous.
    Google the FDA. The reason they do this is it is very hard for food companies to guarantee an exact size/weight on any particular item when it is made so the FDA allows the 20% rule.

    Another example is restraunts. When say Applebees say's their chicken salad orange ruffy is 605 calories what happens if the chef puts in too little or too much in the bowel? Hence the 20% rule.

    .
    208.50 11-1-11

    203.00 8-31-12

    197.00 1-18-2013
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Registered User britt777's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: United States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 74
    Rep Power: 226
    britt777 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    britt777 is offline
    That makes sense. Thanks for the info.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User Beech27's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,114
    Rep Power: 4682
    Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Beech27 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Beech27 is offline
    If you actually weigh your food, you might be surprised how many calories it contains. One of my 70 cal eggs? Actually about 100. One half cup of rolled oats supposedly clocks in at abut 15 cals. My scale says about 200. Which isn't to say that you need to weigh everything. That sort of behavior is both impractical and overly compulsive. At least, I think it is. Just realize that you're probably eating more calories than the labels would indicate, and if you're results aren't what you'd like, adjust accordingly.
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Registered User britt777's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Location: United States
    Age: 54
    Posts: 74
    Rep Power: 226
    britt777 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    britt777 is offline
    I agree totally. Not looking for anything compulsive...lol. I think its bad enough just writing everything down. I have been doing that for a week and I am done with that. I have seen and understand what is a good amount of calories is and how much i need to eat to stay in that range, for now any way.
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-24-2009, 04:59 AM
  2. Need help reading labels -reps
    By renegadecz in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-15-2007, 11:10 AM
  3. Reading Labels for a dummie!
    By BrownIGrL in forum Female Bodybuilding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-04-2007, 03:03 AM
  4. Reading labels (carbohydrates)
    By Bucklemeister7 in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 05:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts