Reply
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User powerbui1der's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2004
    Posts: 156
    Rep Power: 0
    powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10) powerbui1der has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    powerbui1der is offline

    Post-workout Drinks - an update

    http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do...ydra?id=659666

    Interesting article regaurding post workout nutrition. It will certainly cause me to consider alternitive methods for my post workout meals.
    If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User Leafs/Pack's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: Ontario, Canada
    Posts: 538
    Rep Power: 503
    Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Leafs/Pack has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    Leafs/Pack is offline
    Bump, definitley interesting.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User unclejeff's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2004
    Location: Louisiana, United States
    Age: 40
    Posts: 5,167
    Rep Power: 3416
    unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) unclejeff is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    unclejeff is offline
    all the nutritional" know it alls" on this board should take a glance at this....it is definitely a good read
    WHO DAT
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User Cynical_Simian's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2004
    Posts: 1,196
    Rep Power: 978
    Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Cynical_Simian is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    Cynical_Simian is offline
    Somebody posted a link to this article in a PWO thread earlier today...this was my take on it...

    Originally Posted by Cynical_Simian
    The article basically refutes a bunch of straw man arguments.

    1. Just argues against the notion that glycogen restoration should be the primary goal of PWO. No problem.
    2-3. Most people here already know that pre-WO is just as important as, if not more so than, PWO.
    4. Just notes that protein synthesis is raised (ostensibly from a "normal" baseline); that doesn't mean that the need/rate isn't even more significant in the time closer to the workout (i.e. the "window").
    5. The instantaneous rate is irrelevant; if you fasted for a day, worked out, then waited an hour, it would probably be even higher. It's basically arguing that you should sit around in catabolism just so you can brag about how fast your protein synthesis is.
    6. Again, too much of a focus on instantaneous rates. By this logic, the only protein source we should consume is BCAAs (see #8) since they have the highest immediate rate of synthesis.
    7. Same as #4.
    8. Nobody would argue that whey concentrate is the fastest possible option, but it's fast enough, especially if you get your pre-WO nutrition right. The sudden emphasis on speed would seem to contradict some of their previous points as well.
    9-10. Are these "myths" even a widespread/important part of people's PWO strategies?

    Anyway, that's just my "off-the-top-of-my-head" commentary. I'm sure Alan or ghost will be along soon to provide some real expert nutritional/physiological perspectives.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User David77's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2005
    Age: 42
    Posts: 3,293
    Rep Power: 997
    David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) David77 is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    David77 is offline
    The only thing that would change my PWO shake is the research that says that immediately after training is sub optimal. He doesn't say how long we should wait though.

    I also take a multi vitamin with my PWO shake and his research seems to say that this would be harmful. Maybe I'll just take a multi in the morning and that's all. It would save me some money.

    Good article, worth reading.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User Jules Verne's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2004
    Age: 51
    Posts: 4,948
    Rep Power: 1833
    Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000) Jules Verne is just really nice. (+1000)
    Jules Verne is offline
    Originally Posted by David77
    The only thing that would change my PWO shake is the research that says that immediately after training is sub optimal. He doesn't say how long we should wait though.

    I also take a multi vitamin with my PWO shake and his research seems to say that this would be harmful. Maybe I'll just take a multi in the morning and that's all. It would save me some money.

    Good article, worth reading.
    I haven't actually read the research, but I wonder if they actually drank a PWO shake or injected aminos+sugar into the blood. Remember that the whey+dex or oats are going to take 30-60 mins to raise blood sugar and amino acid levels anyway.

    The main thing I would take from this are the multiple feedings, which I have advocated myself and practice. In other words several small shakes/meals spaced 60-90 mins apart may be better than one huge shake, whether it be dex or oats.

    As I wrote in another thread, you might still want to do some self experimentation, since a lo will depend on your pre-WO nutrition and your overall nutrition and marcos. In fact, the evidence as it stands seems to indicate that you can gat a large variety of results in these experiments, which suggest that perhaps individual differences and 24 hour nutrition/timing are a significant factor.
    Last edited by Jules Verne; 06-16-2005 at 05:09 AM.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts