Nomatter what anyone says Broz has created a decent amount of fairly good lifters running out of some tiny ass Las Vegas gym (I know they moved but still) and I guarantee that Broz/Mendes/Gilbert's videos inspired hundreds if not thousands of people to get involved in weightlifting which will end up benefiting the sport tremendously. I know the USAW would have never gotten a penny from me if I hadn't seen Broz's videos, and I'm sure its a similar tale with a lot of others too
|
Thread: Pat Mendes tested positive
-
04-21-2012, 02:46 PM #91
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 14,093
- Rep Power: 7936
-
04-21-2012, 03:05 PM #92
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: Sarasota, Florida, United States
- Posts: 3,208
- Rep Power: 2693
-
-
04-21-2012, 05:33 PM #93
-
04-21-2012, 06:11 PM #94
-
04-21-2012, 06:31 PM #95
-
04-22-2012, 06:04 AM #96
-
-
04-22-2012, 06:10 AM #97
I'll concede that the USPF was being tested at that time, however they lost their IPF sanction to the ADFPA/USAPL in part because they weren't living up to the IPF test standards.
The 1996 Jr. Nationals in Philly where Shane broke the 1008lb record was not tested. I was there that day. It was kind of a running joke among the lifters, and Robert Keller (the meet director) will tell you the same.
Shane got a pass on that one.
-
04-22-2012, 06:52 AM #98
+1.
And I don't get this whole "they must juice because the max out everyday" thing. The body adapts to pretty much everything if you build up to it. Whether you'll start to put up numbers that are on an international level in a very short amount of time may depend on celltech, but it's naive to think that a PED-free athlete can't be training (/squatting to max) everyday. It's more about how you get to that point, how huge the volume of work around this is and how good the nutritional support is (on diet this is certainly a whole another beast and of course this might become a big issue for lifters who have to stay/diet down to a certain class).
But what about the experienced lifters here: You tell me that you can't imagine yourself to do (after warming up) a single set of max squats? One-two reps a day and your body can't recover from that till the next day after years and years of training? I don't put up numbers close to the Broz-Guys, but after training into it I have absolutely no problem of squatting to max everyday for 3-4sets and even do a single set of max-deadlifts everyday. But that's also pretty much it for the day (regarding lower body)! After 1-2months I barely got sore at all and keep it like that since almost half a year now. The trick is really just to cut down all the unneccessary and hindering assistance stuff around it.
I'm not suprised that Mendes cheated, but that's not because he did max-squats everyday, but because he no-no-no squatted 350Kg w/ 19yrs...Sports Therapy- & Prevention Major - University of Potsdam
Exercise Biology Major - University of California, Davis
Certified Strength and Conditioning Coach
Nutritional Consultant
-
04-22-2012, 10:31 AM #99
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,688
- Rep Power: 6655
PBs:
Oly Squat: 145 kg
Front Squat: 125 kg
Strict Overhead Press: 75x2 kg
Push Press: 90 kg
Bench Press: 100 kg
Deadlift: 180 kg
Power|Full Clean: 95|100 kg
(Hang) Power Snatch: 72.5 kg
40-Yard Dash: 4.7s
3-Cone Drill: 6.8s
My Strength Training Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=129882473
☆☆☆υк ¢яєω☆☆☆
~misc audiophile crew
-
04-22-2012, 10:43 AM #100
Neither can you prove it. Shane trained at the OTC and submitted to drug tests, so of course he had more support. He chose it. Pat refused it. However Pat did snatch 207 so apparently he didn't need the emotional support of USAW because he had something else. You can speculate all you want about Shane, but he squatted +900lbs under drug tests as well as totaling +420 numerous times with drug tests.Maybe Pat could have done the same if he had chose the right path, but he didn't and we may never see him again if he gets banned 4 years.
"However, the strength of the hamstring muscles is crucial to fully exploit the strength potential of the quads and ultimately the vertical force that the athlete is able to impart to the barbell." - Andrew Charniga, Jr.
-
-
04-22-2012, 01:37 PM #101
-
04-22-2012, 01:51 PM #102
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,688
- Rep Power: 6655
PBs:
Oly Squat: 145 kg
Front Squat: 125 kg
Strict Overhead Press: 75x2 kg
Push Press: 90 kg
Bench Press: 100 kg
Deadlift: 180 kg
Power|Full Clean: 95|100 kg
(Hang) Power Snatch: 72.5 kg
40-Yard Dash: 4.7s
3-Cone Drill: 6.8s
My Strength Training Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=129882473
☆☆☆υк ¢яєω☆☆☆
~misc audiophile crew
-
04-22-2012, 02:36 PM #103
What makes you such an arrogant and ignorant person? I study this stuff, work in that area for years and live it myself since almost a decade. I am probably more experienced, smarter and certainly stronger than you are. So why don't you show a little bit more respect, since I didn't even offend you with any of my postings?
Ok, I'll be calm and explain it to you again: Smart doping increases the degree of adaptation to every single training, far more than it increases your physiological ability to train more often (this happens too, particularly when using GH, but to a less significant degree). I.e. roids make your muscles grow faster/better, by decreasing cortisol-dependend protein-breakdown and increasing muscle protein synthesis. They don't make your tendons and ligaments or any other passive element heal faster, which would be the only thing that allows for more training.
Again: Everybody can train as frequent and with a similar volume as the Broz-Guys do and when done smart and considerate, this will be a good and efficient way to increase strength and muscle mass. However, this doesn't mean that you (unlike the Broz-Guys) will be able to put another 100Kg on your squat PR within a year or two. Such unreal, extremely fast increases in strength/mass may be an indicator of doping - not the amount of sessions a person trains. That was my point.Sports Therapy- & Prevention Major - University of Potsdam
Exercise Biology Major - University of California, Davis
Certified Strength and Conditioning Coach
Nutritional Consultant
-
04-22-2012, 02:47 PM #104
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,688
- Rep Power: 6655
I don't think anything I said was arrogant or ignorant at all (I wanted you to explain your initial claims, but you switched it into asking me what I thought, hence I gave my opinion. You can't turn around and call me arrogant for that). lol OK buddy, you're stronger thus that gives more weight to what you say? I'm not going to be drawn into an argument about this so I'll pretend I didn't read your other assumptions.
I agree with some of what you just said, but IMO it doesn't justify what you claimed before.
Anyway...Last edited by lwild; 04-22-2012 at 03:01 PM.
PBs:
Oly Squat: 145 kg
Front Squat: 125 kg
Strict Overhead Press: 75x2 kg
Push Press: 90 kg
Bench Press: 100 kg
Deadlift: 180 kg
Power|Full Clean: 95|100 kg
(Hang) Power Snatch: 72.5 kg
40-Yard Dash: 4.7s
3-Cone Drill: 6.8s
My Strength Training Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=129882473
☆☆☆υк ¢яєω☆☆☆
~misc audiophile crew
-
-
04-22-2012, 02:47 PM #105
-
04-22-2012, 02:52 PM #106
-
04-22-2012, 06:23 PM #107
-
04-22-2012, 06:38 PM #108
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Decatur, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 8,522
- Rep Power: 25304
Wait, is Mendes an outlier with amazing talent who could be a medal contender or just a random kid in Vegas who Broz's amazing coaching took (almost) to the top? You can't have it both ways. That said, I like Mendes, I don't disagree that Broz has done some good things, but the unavoidable fact of the matter is his top 2 remaining lifters just got popped after a 3rd quite at a time that would indicate he was concerned about being popped. He created a buzz but that doesn't mean we ignore all other coaches, lifters, and methods just because he struck a nerve with people nor should we stick our head in the sand and pretend that part of his regimen didn't include PED use. That ignores pretty much all of the data out there. I don't think he should be damned for it, nor do I think he should be put on a pedestal because he made cool videos out of a small gym.
-
-
04-23-2012, 03:44 AM #109
Your "Look up Periodization, thanks." sounded pretty arrogant to me. But no worries if you didn't mean it like that. My initial point was just, that's it's a matter of how you build up to the point where you train this frequent and particularly a matter of what you're used to. When a Pat Mendes goes max on squats with 350Kg, this isn't more likely to cause injury than a beginner who goes max with his 100Kg 1RPM. You see where I'm going with that? In fact, it's probably far less likely for such experienced athletes to get injured (despite that the absolute load is heavier), because they have better technique, know how to handle a rep they fail and use weights they know they have a chance to move. Overdoing it load- and frequency-wise can cause injury to any athlete, no matter the level. How come Mendes can move a weight without tearing anything, when I would get completely crushed? Because he has bigger muscles, stiffer tendons and denser bones and this came over time, through adaptation. Now, especially in such young athletes who haven't given their body the proper time to entirely adapt to this kind of training, particularly when using PEDs like roids, the adaptation in certain areas (like the strength/size of the muscle) can surpass some other adaptations by far: The muscle grows faster and gets stronger than the tendons could ever handle. To avoid those kind of injuries you need other PEDs, such as GH, which trigger other adaptations like collagen synthesis to support tendon-growth.
Mendes has injury issues because he became strong in an "unnatural" short amount of time, not because he is as strong as he is and trains frequent.
Ich komme ursprünglich aus Berlin, habe aber die letzten 7 Monate in Davis an der UC studiert. Hast du eine Zeit lang in Deutschland gelebt oder einfach Deutsch als Fach in der Highschool gehabt?
`
Absolutely agree with that.Sports Therapy- & Prevention Major - University of Potsdam
Exercise Biology Major - University of California, Davis
Certified Strength and Conditioning Coach
Nutritional Consultant
-
04-23-2012, 04:43 AM #110
-
04-23-2012, 04:55 AM #111
-
04-23-2012, 05:00 AM #112
-
-
04-23-2012, 05:03 AM #113
-
04-23-2012, 05:43 AM #114
-
04-23-2012, 06:09 AM #115
-
04-23-2012, 06:28 AM #116
-
-
04-23-2012, 10:53 AM #117
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,688
- Rep Power: 6655
PBs:
Oly Squat: 145 kg
Front Squat: 125 kg
Strict Overhead Press: 75x2 kg
Push Press: 90 kg
Bench Press: 100 kg
Deadlift: 180 kg
Power|Full Clean: 95|100 kg
(Hang) Power Snatch: 72.5 kg
40-Yard Dash: 4.7s
3-Cone Drill: 6.8s
My Strength Training Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=129882473
☆☆☆υк ¢яєω☆☆☆
~misc audiophile crew
-
04-23-2012, 11:45 AM #118
Haha, I would've repped you for this one if I could.
Chigiskov: Yeah, true. It's most certainly not only one single issue... At the end of day, I'd still say Mendes did absolutely everything right regarding his lifting career - except getting caught. He and the other Broz-Athletes are still hella inspiring to me though. Gear or not, what they accomplish is almost unreal.Sports Therapy- & Prevention Major - University of Potsdam
Exercise Biology Major - University of California, Davis
Certified Strength and Conditioning Coach
Nutritional Consultant
-
04-23-2012, 03:42 PM #119
-
04-23-2012, 05:55 PM #120
Similar Threads
-
PanAm replacement, how to stay w/i the rules
By isaku900 in forum Olympic LiftingReplies: 62Last Post: 04-16-2012, 10:37 AM -
Pat Mendes - 207.5 Snatch
By breathinglife in forum Olympic LiftingReplies: 89Last Post: 01-05-2011, 10:55 PM -
Pat Mendes 486 Clean
By dragster84 in forum Powerlifting/StrongmanReplies: 48Last Post: 04-06-2010, 07:15 PM
Bookmarks