The term gets thrown around left and right. Even my first PT (yes I now realize many of them are a bit clueless) recommended I work different body parts with different exercises and weights quite frequently, not that I think that one would reap premium rewards from such an approach, but my question still remains: is muscle confusion something real, effective and noteworthy?
Seems to me it couldn't be THAT important seeing that so many people get good results with a routine lineup of free weight compound exercises.
|
Thread: Is "muscle confusion" real?
-
05-28-2011, 04:52 PM #1
Is "muscle confusion" real?
-
05-28-2011, 04:58 PM #2
-
05-28-2011, 05:17 PM #3
Seems pretty stupid that this muscle confusion rumor is still talked about then. But when you think about it, yeah, that sounds stupid to think you're "confusing" your muscles. I think what they mean by confusion is really just get it out of its comfort zone. But then again, isn't that what weight lifting is all about? Only the most ignorant bunch would think they'd yield huge results from same sets/reps/weight all the time. Every time you increase the weights you're "confusing" your muscles.
-
05-28-2011, 05:19 PM #4
-
-
05-28-2011, 05:29 PM #5
-
05-28-2011, 05:43 PM #6
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 917
- Rep Power: 204
i agree with progression, only thing i see benefiting by changing up the exercises is by hitting the muscles at a different angle to stimulate need fibers, for more muscle growth, not for sure though
"Live and Fly Standards High Delta Chi Till I Die"
"Your not alive unless your living."
"When you want to succeed as bad you want to breathe, then you'll be successful."
"The Whole ****ing Nine Yards!"
★★★USF MISC CREW★★★
-
05-28-2011, 05:48 PM #7No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
05-28-2011, 05:50 PM #8
-
-
05-28-2011, 08:24 PM #9
-
05-28-2011, 09:29 PM #10
Charles Poliquin, a noted strength coach, once wrote an article on this topic. He mentioned that out of a fairly large number of athletes observed--mainly Olympic ones, if I remember correctly--that only a very small percentage could get away with changing programmes almost every time out, something like 2%. Now these athletes are the elite of their sport, so taking that into consideration, and factoring in their better-than-average recovery abilities, the fact that all they do is train AND rest (for the most part), and the usage of steroids in some of the athletes, then if you apply the "confusion theory" to the general populace, the chances of someone doing something different every couple of workouts and making gains would be very, very small.
Inb4someonecallsmepoliquiinnuthugger.
It is true that your muscles don't think and that attacking them from different angles will probably cause an adaptive response, but having said that, if you don't progress in a given movement i.e. squats, inclines, presses, rows, etc., and keep progressing until you stall out i.e. six to eight weeks later, then how will you know what your progress in that given movement could be? JMO...
(P.S. Ironwill's post is well thought out and I agree 100%)."Don't call me Miss Kitty. Just...don't."--Catnip. Check out the Catnip Trilogy on Amazon.com
"Chivalry isn't dead. It just wears a skirt."--Twisted, the YA gender bender deal of the century!
Check out my links to Mr. Taxi, Star Maps, and other fine YA Action/Romance novels at http://www.amazon.com/J.S.-Frankel/e/B004XUUTB8/ref=dp_byline_cont_ebooks_1
-
05-28-2011, 09:33 PM #11
-
05-28-2011, 10:13 PM #12
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: A house on a hill, Australia
- Posts: 6,931
- Rep Power: 18230
Muscles don't think, so obviously they can't literally be confused.
There is validity to working the muscles in different ways, in that alterations to the movement pattern, range of motion, intensity and so forth will cause different motor recruitment patterns, thus (using chest as an example) doing flat BB bench, DB bench and machine chest press may stimulate more growth than the BB bench alone.
However, this all runs back to the 80/20 rule of lifting, ie that 80% of results come from 20% of the work (this isn't an exact science, but it gets the point across). Doing lots of different variations of the same essential movement may yield slightly better results than just focusing on the basic movement, but there are better things you could be doing with your time.
Going the "muscle confusion" route, and getting rid of one exercise to do another (eg removing BB bench entirely to do DB bench, as oppose to focusing on one and using the other as assistance) does not support longterm progress, and progress is more important than getting a different 10 muscle fibres to fire.SQ 172.5kg. BP 105kg. DL 200kg. OHP 62.5kg @ 67.3kg
Greg Everett says: "You take someone who's totally sedentary and you can get 'em stronger by making them pick their nose vigorously for an hour a day."
Sometimes I write things about training: modernstrengthtraining.wordpress.com
-
-
05-29-2011, 01:44 AM #13
-
05-29-2011, 01:58 AM #14
yes, most of poliquin's material is mainly applicable to advanced trainees.
a change in methods is good occasionally (not too often), can be a useful tool to aid progress for intermediate & advanced athletes but has nothing to do with confusion, rather periodization.
general public has a hard time motivating themselves to do any sort of exercise, for them constant non-stop variety is vital simply because it may keep things more interesting otherwise doing the same thing can get boring for them & they will quickly quit. taking into account this behavioral loophole, certain companies crafted the clever marketing catchphrase as iw08 pointed out & were able to convince the public that muscle confusion is a scientific principle that magnifies results when in fact they were just keeping them from getting bored & quitting. any exercise is better than no exercise so from that point of view i guess they are right.
for serious athletes looking to gain size & strength, changing things too often will sabotage progress. progress is attained by developing efficiency in dealing with a certain a loading pattern (i.e. repeating it & getting used to it), then forcing yourself to do more & more regardless of how hard or boring it feels. changing the loading pattern can come perhaps after the couch potato has purchased his 20th gimmick.Last edited by gomez26; 05-29-2011 at 08:13 AM.
"Though the concept is not scientifically validated in detail (it should be considered as a hypothesis rather than a scientific theory), it is useful from a practical standpoint. When training athletes, it is impossible to wait until scientific research provides all of the necessary knowledge." Vladmir M. Zatsiorsky, Ph.D.
-
05-29-2011, 04:20 AM #15
-
05-29-2011, 11:25 AM #16
-
-
05-29-2011, 04:12 PM #17
-
05-29-2011, 06:38 PM #18
lol Like I said, people don't (hopefully...) think muscles can get confused in that you can trick them. The meaning, in my eyes, is that you are hitting them in a way that stretches one's comfort zone (whether strength/range/mobility wise) beyond the normal limit. However like it's already been said, if you don't work the muscles out in a set fashion for at least a few weeks, how could you know that you've improved?
So yeah, I feel more informed now, thanks. =p If the idea of the confusion is having your muscles get triggered by different means, surely you could just find an exercise for it and progress from there. Perhaps one of the groups of people that fall into this belief system is the type that performs the same exercises with the same reps, sets and weights.
Perhaps instead of thinking through that they could just add weight/sets/reps or decrease recovery time, they think their lack of results could be filled with variety. Let's not forget how easy it would be to skip around the gym doing isolation exercises like we're doing endurance training. Fun and easy, yet ineffective.
-
05-29-2011, 07:08 PM #19
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 320
- Rep Power: 280
-
05-29-2011, 07:12 PM #20
You have to decide how you want to workout. What are your goals? Do you want power/strength, hypertrophy or endurance? If you train 3 sets of 12, you're getting more into hypertrophy. Doing workouts like 5x5's are more about strength. If you care more about how you look than how you perform, by all means do 3 sets of 12. You're not confusing your muscles regardless of how many sets or reps you do and when. How can you confuse them when they are being told by your brain that you are about to switch it up?
-
-
05-29-2011, 07:15 PM #21
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 320
- Rep Power: 280
-
05-29-2011, 07:40 PM #22
-
05-29-2011, 08:07 PM #23
They wouldn't be used to the fluctuation of reps, which is actually bad for a couple reasons. First, your body has nothing to build off of. If you start doing exercises for triceps like the bench press, then switch to pushups, then dips, then etc...how can you/your body ever focus on improving? By the time you learn what proper form is, you're already on to the next exercise. By the time you try to focus on adding extra weight/sets/reps to that exercise, you've already moved on.
You have no time or way to improve in a certain aspect if you don't give it the time of day. How easy is it to get good at basketball if you then immediately switch to tennis, then to football, then to soccer? How easy is it to divulge deeply into a possible career field if you study psychology for 30 minutes, biology for 45 minutes and economics for an hour? While these examples may be a little bad, you get the idea. How in the world can you improve yourself on these exercises if you constantly switch up? Quality over quantity.
The other thing is that even if you COULD improve in said areas, do you know how hard it would be to track it? If you're doing eight different exercises on any given day, how do you know which ones are/are not the cause of the results?
My point is that by sticking with the simple stuff, at least in the beginning, is probably key for most people. Less of a chance to get intimidated/overwhelmed and end up quitting or taking a prolonged break. Less chance of too many variables screwing with your success and surely enough: less chance of over analyzing things and wondering if you'll ever get what you tried for.
Hypertrophy is really the increase of the muscle's SIZE, but not necessarily the strength. Bodybuilding is a sport that focuses a lot on hypertrophy. If you want performance, you need to focus on strength training. It will provide hypertrophy as well, but not to the extent of a bodybuilding routine. Keep the sets and reps at 4-6 while using free weight compound exercises and you'll see an increase in both.
There's some good ones on this site. Here's a great routine you should consider: http://stronglifts.com/stronglifts-5...ining-program/
-
05-30-2011, 04:57 AM #24
The body needs a variety of stimulus through different rep ranges, exercises, volumes, intensity techniques.
However it is generally recommended that you spend at least 3-6 months each on tried and proven programs which explore these concepts. This gives your body a chance to actually improve in that area. Hopping around too much is counter-productive, to me it seems like a good way to slowly progress everywhere.
-
-
05-30-2011, 06:54 AM #25
- Join Date: May 2007
- Location: Romeoville, Illinois, United States
- Age: 63
- Posts: 1,812
- Rep Power: 3410
muscle confusion if thats what you want to call it is probably for people like me who are hitting the weights to burn calories.im not eating to get bigger,id like to get a little smaller in some areas.so i figure if i switch up the lifts alot i dont get too used to it,and have to expend more calories doing it.a few months ago i was doing 30 or 40 pullups,then switched to chins which seemed to take a little more out of me for awhile,then i switched to neutral grip for the same reason.i do that with most things but i dont think that would be a good way to put on muscle quickly.
-
05-30-2011, 10:32 AM #26
If you mean fat loss, cardio would probably be the best bet. Especially high interval training. If you're talking about calorie deficit, that's everything to do with your diet. Lifting itself will have nothing to do with that. Figure out your calorie intake and subtract 500 calories or something like that. You can workout until you're blue in the face, but if you stuff your face full of food all day, you're not in a calorie deficit, regardless of how hard you worked in the gym.
Similar Threads
-
O/T: The Science of "Muscle Confusion" - Put up or shut up!
By mjw8204 in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 22Last Post: 12-30-2010, 03:27 PM -
Question about "muscle confusion" and military presses
By wrestlerguy in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 2Last Post: 10-30-2008, 12:22 PM -
"REAL MUSCLE" - Check out the video clip!
By Natural_O in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 24Last Post: 10-24-2007, 08:45 PM
Bookmarks