Before I cook a piece of chicken breast, it weighs about 8 oz which equals to about 50g of protein if that's how I'm supposed to weigh it. But with that same piece, after I throw it on the george foreman grill, it goes down to about 5 oz because of the loss of water. That's a big difference that could affect how many calories I believe I'm taking in.
On the nutrition label, it says "serving size 4 oz" but it doesn't say raw or cooked. How should I be measuring it?
|
-
09-05-2008, 02:02 PM #1
How to measure chicken breast nutrition....raw or cooked?
Last edited by Chicago1287; 09-05-2008 at 02:04 PM.
-
09-05-2008, 02:04 PM #2
-
09-05-2008, 02:30 PM #3
-
09-05-2008, 03:19 PM #4
-
-
09-05-2008, 03:24 PM #5
-
09-05-2008, 07:01 PM #6
-
09-06-2008, 08:42 AM #7
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 1,388
- Rep Power: 1406
what if it is frozen
Team Norton
"You will not outwork me"
My Training log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=122423471
Dont worry so much about that. EAT RIGHT, gain a lot of muscle and strength which in turn will increase your metabolism so your body will need more calories as fuel. This will keep fat slowly burning. Just live the bodybuilding lifestyle ~ Rubicon
-
09-06-2008, 08:46 AM #8
- Join Date: Apr 2003
- Location: Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,451
- Rep Power: 0
As long as you are consistent with your measurements and the way you measure, it really doesn't matter.
Being consistent and consistently inconsistent is the same thing...lol.
I've done both, and it really doesn't make a difference. Calories are calories, so if you do it cooked, compute your calories cooked. If you do it raw, I really suggest using protection but still- compute your calories raw then, baby.
-
-
09-06-2008, 08:47 AM #9
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 1,388
- Rep Power: 1406
sounds good thanks
Team Norton
"You will not outwork me"
My Training log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=122423471
Dont worry so much about that. EAT RIGHT, gain a lot of muscle and strength which in turn will increase your metabolism so your body will need more calories as fuel. This will keep fat slowly burning. Just live the bodybuilding lifestyle ~ Rubicon
-
09-06-2008, 08:48 AM #10
-
09-06-2008, 08:48 AM #11
-
09-06-2008, 02:13 PM #12
This is really hard to explain. I'm not talking about eating it raw or cooked. I'm talking about how many grams of protein there is in the end after I cook it. My point is, let's say the package says 4oz has 24g of protein. If I measure out 4oz of raw chicken, then I cook it, it shrinks down to 2oz because of the water loss. So now, the chicken weighs 2oz instead of the 4oz that it was in the beginning.
Am I supposed to go by the cooked weight (2oz), or the weight before I cooked it (4oz)? If I go by the cooked weight, I'm only getting 12g of protein because it shrunk down to 2oz (since the label says 4oz has 24g of protein). If I go by the raw weight, I'm getting 24g of protein because it's 4oz since it didn't shrink yet.
My thing is, I try to reach a certain amount of protein in each meal, so I try to figure out how much there really is in all my food. So with chicken, if I'm going by the raw weight (4oz in this example) but the label in fact REALLY means that I should be going by the cooked weight, then I'm getting 12g less protein than what I thought I'm getting.
I think I'll just eat a lot of chicken.
-
-
09-06-2008, 02:20 PM #13
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 24,222
- Rep Power: 34135
-
09-06-2008, 02:29 PM #14
Exactly. And, not since you know that it approximately halves in weight when you cook it (sounds like overcooking to me, but that's another matter), you know if you weigh it cooked it has 24g protein per 2oz.
The only time you will have to rethink this is if you are cooking something fatty, then you do lose macros (fat, not protein) during cooking. In that case you can either use raw values and estimate fat lost, or find some values for cooked meat/fish that are likely closest to the way you cook it. Most of the weight lost will still be water though. So as long as you are consistent, as mentioned previously, you should be fine.
-
09-06-2008, 02:46 PM #15
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 39
- Posts: 897
- Rep Power: 303
i think you should definitely relate the nutrition information with the raw ingredient..
Ex. beef jerky (average round, top)
1 oz. (28g)
Calories 80
Total fat 1g
Protein 12g
beef, raw (average round, top)
1 oz. (28g)
Calories 43
Total fat 1g
Protein 6g
weight your chicken before cooking, raw, and disregard the weight you are left with after cooking because moisture content changes with length of cooking, or type of preparation.The snozzberries taste like snozzberries!
Bookmarks