Funny and logical.
|
-
02-28-2015, 05:40 AM #1
-
02-28-2015, 05:45 AM #2
-
02-28-2015, 05:46 AM #3
-
02-28-2015, 05:46 AM #4
-
-
02-28-2015, 05:46 AM #5
I love it when people intentionally ignore that the US murder and gun/violent crime rate has plummeted (down by 50%) while legal ownership & concealed carry has expanded across the country during the past two decades.
Then he pretends the "only" argument for guns is "f*ck off". Troll gonna troll. Followed by the rest of his ridiculous lies.
Hint: Don't use a comedian to push a fact-based position, especially if he has no interest in those facts.
-
02-28-2015, 05:49 AM #6
-
02-28-2015, 05:50 AM #7
-
02-28-2015, 05:51 AM #8
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 56,947
- Rep Power: 599508
"Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6. Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossible to touch a minor inappropriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognize someone putting a hand on their chest as groping, whether it is inappropriate or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
-
-
02-28-2015, 05:52 AM #9
-
02-28-2015, 05:53 AM #10
-
02-28-2015, 05:53 AM #11
-
02-28-2015, 05:53 AM #12
-
-
02-28-2015, 05:54 AM #13
-
02-28-2015, 05:59 AM #14
-
02-28-2015, 06:00 AM #15
-
02-28-2015, 06:00 AM #16
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 4,767
- Rep Power: 0
"I got broke into, they threatened to rape my girlfriend" But they just want your TV, right brah?
"Most people just who break into your house just want your TV" Well I don't want some poverty kunt to have my TV, is that ridiculous of me?
The chit this pussy talks about is ridiculous. Fat, sensationalist, flabby-tittied beta, emotional neck-beard liberal. Ignore facts because emotions are more important.
Here's how to destroy the anti-gun argument, in a few easy steps:
1. Law-abiding citizens don't commit mass-shootings.
2. Criminals unlawfully shoot people.
3. Criminals by definition do not follow the law.
4. Pass a gun ban, law-abiding (non-mass shooting) citizens are unarmed.
5. Criminals still have guns, remember they don't follow the law.
6. Mass-shootings still happen because criminals still have guns because let's just hammer this point home criminals do not follow the law
7. Liberals gon' liberal.
English brah checking in, wish we had guns.
*Got further in; so wait he uses the first amendment as a support of his argument that the second amendment should be outlawed? Strong.Last edited by ProjectWheyhem; 02-28-2015 at 06:08 AM.
-
-
02-28-2015, 06:00 AM #17
-
02-28-2015, 06:02 AM #18
-
02-28-2015, 06:02 AM #19
Allow me to destroy Jim Jeffries with "logic".
Criminals who would use guns to commit crimes such as killing people already don't give a flying phuck about the law... if they care so little about the law that they will murder people with a gun(s), what makes you think they're gonna give a phuck about a law saying they can't own a gun?
The bastardization of our 2nd Amendment rights serves only to disarm law abiding citizens and make them more vulnerable to criminals who already disregard major laws (like not killing people). Look at Canada... total nanny nation, with much tighter gun control than the U.S., yet they've been all over the news over major gun related violence.
-
02-28-2015, 06:04 AM #20
-
-
02-28-2015, 06:04 AM #21
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 56,947
- Rep Power: 599508
"Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6. Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossible to touch a minor inappropriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognize someone putting a hand on their chest as groping, whether it is inappropriate or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
-
02-28-2015, 06:05 AM #22
-
02-28-2015, 06:07 AM #23
-
02-28-2015, 06:07 AM #24
-
-
02-28-2015, 06:12 AM #25
-
02-28-2015, 06:12 AM #26
-
02-28-2015, 06:12 AM #27
-
02-28-2015, 06:13 AM #28
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 4,767
- Rep Power: 0
... But they DO in America.
We aren't talking about where YOU or where I live.
There are so many guns in America already, do you propose that Jim Jeffries orders the police forces of every state to sweep every house and property in the country to take away people's guns? How do you think that would go, do you think criminals would peacefully allow their guns to be taken?
Do you think the police force would relish going into homes as walking targets? The same police force that has systematically been neutered and bad-mouthed by the media and political correctness? Why do you think these officers would be so willing to support such a proposal?
Is Jim Jeffries proposing that he goes into each individual home and take their guns?
-
-
02-28-2015, 06:16 AM #29
-
02-28-2015, 06:16 AM #30
Bookmarks