Essentially its stated that there are nutrient partitioning benefits when carbs (especially high glycemic) are eaten at night (thus body composition benefits).
I WANT to believe what he is saying, however I know it runs counter to the current consensus on this forum, thoughts?
Per Kiefer on Rob Wolff podcast, discussion starts at 17:00 mark (he references 'specific studies' at the 20:10 mark):
*also at 29:00 mark he discusses partitioning in more detail and why its different at night:
http://robbwolf.com/2012/11/27/kiefe...g-episode-160/
|
-
11-28-2012, 03:56 AM #1
The body composition benifits of high glycemic carbs at night
Last edited by scubasteve1; 11-28-2012 at 04:16 AM.
-
11-28-2012, 04:49 AM #2
-
11-28-2012, 04:50 AM #3
Consensus of this forum is eat when you want, what you want (as long as it fits)
"Overtraining" - sponsoring fukarounditis & half a$sed workouts since 1991
"Its quite hard to hit Calories equal to macros." -LDNpeter
^This is why the Nutrition section can't have nice things.
"Look son, there comes a time in every man's life when he has to make a decision. Do you want to be big, powerful, jacked, yoked up, have women everywhere want you and men fear you . . . or do you want to do crossfit?"
-
11-28-2012, 08:09 AM #4
-
-
11-28-2012, 08:10 AM #5
-
11-28-2012, 08:29 AM #6
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Location: Alaska, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 2,375
- Rep Power: 4693
perpetual motion started a really good thread on this here
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...hp?t=149292883
-
11-28-2012, 08:31 AM #7
-
11-28-2012, 08:38 AM #8
-
-
11-28-2012, 08:52 AM #9
They might be legitimate, but to what real benefit?
Going all OCD over some minute detail to gain an .001% advantage seems pretty pointless, especially if applied to 90% of the posters on this site who think walking a mile a day = leg "training." KWIM?
See: the AA quote in my sig.No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
11-28-2012, 08:53 AM #10
-
11-28-2012, 10:08 AM #11
-
11-28-2012, 10:30 AM #12
-
-
11-28-2012, 11:07 AM #13
-
11-28-2012, 11:10 AM #14
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Trevor, Wisconsin, United States
- Age: 64
- Posts: 416
- Rep Power: 224
I understand your point, but Blade's version of CBL has worked wonders for me. Putting science aside, compliance and progression are the most important keys in my view. I used to follow the tried/true "6-8 meals a day to boost the metabolism" dogma for years. It drove me crazy if I missed a meal. I stumbled upon Lean Gains about 4 years ago, and have been IF'ing ever since.
Recently I was researching various diet strategies and found Blade's Biorythm Diet. I've been using it for the past 3 months, and my bodyfat has dropped unbelievably fast, while gaining some muscle as well. I know it isn't some kind of magic, and I do track calories, but I have never felt, or looked, better while in a calorie deficit. Plus, this style of eating can be maintained forever, unlike many diets where you have to be super strict while doing it.
I guess this just my longwinded way of saying that we each need to find what we respond to, and like doing, the best. When people ask what I've been doing to make such drastice changes, I tell them.....but I also tell them they need to learn what works for them.
-
11-28-2012, 12:11 PM #15
Bookmarks