I’m wondering if I can have an effective program without incorporating the barbell squat. I used to high bar squat and found it felt less natural than the low bar squat as a guy with long legs, and I constantly felt off balance doing the high bar squat. On the other hand, the low bar position feels more natural, but I sometimes get back soreness because of the torque on my back. I had people look at a video of me squatting and I don’t round my back, so I’m assuming it’s just putting a lot of torque on my back. I was thinking about using the plate loaded Hammer Strength squat machine with shoulder pats and handles as an alternative.
|
-
05-20-2019, 10:07 AM #1
Can I effectively build my legs without barbell squats?
-
05-20-2019, 10:11 AM #2
-
05-20-2019, 10:15 AM #3
-
05-20-2019, 10:27 AM #4
-
-
05-20-2019, 10:58 AM #5
-
05-20-2019, 11:20 AM #6
-
05-20-2019, 11:36 AM #7
-
05-20-2019, 11:50 AM #8
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 45,413
- Rep Power: 407885
-
-
05-20-2019, 11:53 AM #9
-
05-20-2019, 11:56 AM #10
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 45,413
- Rep Power: 407885
might be helpful
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...hp?t=160995431Boomer Rep Crew #1
[]---[] Equipment Crew #37 []---[]
()---() York Barbell Club #3 ()---()
"You want science and studies? **** you. I've got scars and blood and vomit."
-Wendler
-
05-20-2019, 02:38 PM #11
-
05-21-2019, 09:54 PM #12
Research studies show that free-weight barbell squats (any variation) elicit an overall greater muscle activation on the quadriceps and glutes. The particular study I am referring to compared front squats, back squats, machine squat, leg press and leg extension exercises and concluded that both free weight squat variations were convincingly more dominant in activation muscle through EMG signals.
Where the others do work, they do not have the same stabilization requirements as shown with free weights. Therefore you will get strength and hypertrophy gains, however to a much lesser extent, particularly if you are somewhat experienced.
I recommend finding a professional weightlifter to critique your technique (because they are very picky), and try using a weight belt if you are not already doing so
Good luck
-
-
05-22-2019, 06:09 AM #13
-
05-22-2019, 06:29 AM #14
What you have to remember is that squats are hands down the best option. Not only do they elicit a greater muscle activation but they are the most relative movement as the squat movement is the most transferable to everyday life. I actually conducted my own study at university not too long ago that showed similar muscle activation between the front squat, back squat and dumbbell split squat.
Interestingly enough you might realise that front squats and split squats are more difficult, however they actually show the same activity at lighter loads when compared to a heavy back squat. This may help your back problem because you only need to use a lighter weight for the same results. The split squat may be your best option as there is minimal compressive force on the back.
-
05-23-2019, 07:14 AM #15anonymousGuest
I am with you OP. I can't for sh*t get a good form on High Bar Squats. I can bench more than I can Squat, so there is that.
My leg workout is the following:
Leg Press RPT 3x 6-8/8-10/10-12
Leg Curls 3x10 same weight
Leg Extensions 3x10 same weight
Calf Raises RPT 3x AMRAP
And there you go. Not complicated. And no back issues.
If my gym had a Trap Bar, I would use that instead of Leg Presses.
-
05-23-2019, 09:29 AM #16
Bookmarks