|
-
04-14-2013, 04:24 PM #31
-
04-14-2013, 04:25 PM #32
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:26 PM #33
-
04-14-2013, 04:27 PM #34
-
04-14-2013, 04:27 PM #35
-
04-14-2013, 04:28 PM #36
How do you know this? Accurate records are not available for centuries and centuries. We have been keeping track of this for a very small amount of time. How many years of records do we have for the North and South Pole? 300 years ago we did not know many areas of the US existed. I am not saying there is or is not global warming, but we don't have enough data yet.
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:28 PM #37
-
04-14-2013, 04:28 PM #38
-
04-14-2013, 04:28 PM #39
-
04-14-2013, 04:29 PM #40
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:30 PM #41
-
04-14-2013, 04:30 PM #42
There are a lot who do believe it, but it's bull****. Climate change happens, but it's natural, not man made...spring, summer, fall, winter. In the early 80s they warned of global cooling, then global warming. I've been hearing this crap for a long time, but I'm just not dumb enough to believe it. Now it's called climate change, instead of global warming, bc it's just not hot enough these days.
The earth has been around for billions of years, were not going to change the weather. In fact, there is nothing we can do to change it or destroy it, hell, even if you lit up every nuke on the planet, the fallout would eventually clear, and life would re-emerge.
-
04-14-2013, 04:30 PM #43
-
04-14-2013, 04:31 PM #44
there is a difference between peer reviewed studies that have been published in a journal and political organizations like IPCC
majority of climatologists who study these things DO NOT get large lumps of money for doing so.
miscers need to understand the difference between SCIENTISTS and SCIENCE because one of them has an opinion, bias, and agenda and the other does not
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:31 PM #45
-
04-14-2013, 04:32 PM #46
In the 80's the majority of scientists predicted global warming, not global cooling.
psuedo journalism sites like NewWeek blew up some stories about global cooling which in no way was the consensus of scientists at the time.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/ice-...termediate.htm
1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2.
-
04-14-2013, 04:32 PM #47
-
04-14-2013, 04:33 PM #48
Because Pacific decadal oscillation, which humans have no control over, better explains the changes we are seeing in our climates.
It times up perfectly with the "World is going to Freeze" of the 1970's, the "World is going to Burn" of the late-90's into early-2000's, and since it shifted back to the same it was in the 60's and 70's, the reason temperatures have started to go back down and we are seeing "Climate Change" instead of "Global Warming."
But I'm sure you'd already researched all of that.Godfather of *Official US Army Thread*
PaulpFiction's Daddy
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:35 PM #49
pls go. research not even once
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...f/347139a0.pdf
-
04-14-2013, 04:35 PM #50
-
04-14-2013, 04:36 PM #51
1. EVERYONE EVERYWHERE KNOWS THAT THE CLIMATE CHANGES NATURALLY, PHUKING HELL
2. Just because science changes according to our understanding doesnt mean it's never right.
3. It's still called global warming if you want to call it that, temperatures are still getting consistently higher everywhere.
ok im actually done now you just went full potato
4. The earth has been around for billions of years, there's no way we could leave it and go to the moon.
5. The earth has been around for billions of years, there's no way we could have a face-to-face conversation with someone in another country
6. H.A.A.R.P, we can and do control the weather phucknuts
-
04-14-2013, 04:36 PM #52
I've heard that global warming leads to global cooling because of hydrogen bonds in water. Can anyone explain that to me?
I know that the polar ice caps melting means more water, water has a high specific heat so it's hard to cool down, as well as warm up.
I know that more water = more water expansion = flooded coastal areas.
Tbh, I only have mechanics under my belt so the science of climate change is way beyond me. But the arguments that go something like "it's been changing all along" are cringeworthy.**30 tabs open and can't tell which one the sound is coming from crew**
**Fake Handicap Parking Sticker Crew**
**Sleeps Naked Crew**
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:37 PM #53
-
04-14-2013, 04:37 PM #54
- Join Date: Feb 2011
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Age: 36
- Posts: 2,153
- Rep Power: 2529
Im not saying climate change and global warming are true/false but you're fukin naive if you dont think there is corporate/political sponsored pro global warming propaganda as well.
There will always be companies/political figures lobbying both sides of this argument for there own personal good regardless of what is actually happening.***Canadian Crew***
***Recycle Crew***
***MISC Strength Crew***
I believe in morality, which is doing what is right regardless of what I'm told... Not in religion, which is doing what I'm told regardless of what is right.
Squat - 355x3
Deadlift - 425x2
Bench - 265x3
Clean/press - 205x2
-
04-14-2013, 04:38 PM #55
-
04-14-2013, 04:39 PM #56
-
-
04-14-2013, 04:40 PM #57
Then how about other countries quit dealing with the US and how they handle things instead of begging for change from a country that doesn't want to and/or can't. The US isn't like most Euro countries, most Americans spend a great amount of time commuting to and from work, etc.
What is your point, child?
I don't buy into the hype. At first it was global warming, now its global climate change. It's always something to write books / conduct studies / spend hours scaring the masses who never leave big cities so they can make money and make people fight about bs.
-
04-14-2013, 04:40 PM #58
-
04-14-2013, 04:40 PM #59
Did you actually read these or do a quick google search to help prove your point? There is nothing near the "800% faster" climate change you claimed. It's all yearly fluctuations in temperature that have been going on earth for eons. We hardly have reliable evidence of global temperatures from the past 100 years.
No doubt human activities are having an effect all over earth but it's highly exaggerated. We're just amidst one of the temperature variatons mother earth has been going through since the beginning.Chest wounds suck (when properly inflicted).
-
04-14-2013, 04:41 PM #60
it's a fact of science that CO2 molecules can absorb photons at a specific energy level and release them at a higher energy level
this energy is in the form of heat. when more CO2 molecules are present in the air, this effect is magnified.
More CO2 in the atmosphere = more energy in the form of heat
More heat= higher temperatures
what don't you numb nuts understand about that? if you break down climate change to the very core of atomic physics, it makes perfect sense.
Bookmarks