Sheduma's logic is dissapoint.

**Agentdark45** · 10-07-2009, 04:47 AM

Clear your PM's!

According to you:

Men watching porn, in a relationship = a woman posting ass shots on a male dominated site on the internet, in a relationship.

Now if we break this down, what can be inferred from this statement is that you get your sexual kicks from men complimenting / you knowing men are jerking over your pics.

Now, your approach is an ACTIVE way of fullfilling your sexual / attention seeking desires. I.e you are exposing yourself ACTIVELY to get sexual pleasure / a feelgood factor.

A man watching porn is a PASSIVE way of fullfilling his sexual desires. He is not exposing himself in any way shape or form. His method of pleasure is derived purely from mental stimulation, of HIMSELF.

The critical difference between the two approaches? Your approach, sexually arouses OTHERS.

A man jerking it in his basement influences / affects no one else. You exposing your ass to 320940 males on the internet is in a completely different league. Your sexual arousal is directly dependant on the sexual arousal of LOTS of men fauning over you. How you can not see the difference between these two methods of self arousal is shocking.

Your method is no different to going out in the real world and actively flirting with numerous males (whom aren't your boyfriend). Why? Because the end result is the same. i.e sexual arousal from ass shots on the net = sexual arousal from IRL flirting. Because your sexual arousal in both cases is dependant on others.

If you think flirting (and by that I mean peaking sexual interest) with strangers in a relationship is acceptable, I feel sorry for your boyfriend.

Secondly, what is the limit to your arousal methods outside of your relationship? Why stop at clothed ass shots? If the underlying reasons and outcomes are the same, the method of arousal shouldn't matter aye sheduma??

If you are going to reply to this post, do not quote me out of context. It is written as a whole. You must counter ALL of my arguments in a LOGICAL and deducive manner. Do not answer my questions with new questions.

Cliffs:

Sheduma = attention whore (but won't admit it)

**robbiez88** · 10-07-2009, 04:49 AM

brb reading that....

NOT!

**Wrong_Hole** · 10-07-2009, 04:50 AM

i see they deleted my sheduma thread. interesting.

**be.BUILT** · 10-07-2009, 04:53 AM

I don't agree with some of the details and such, but generally:

/agreed

**Achilles87** · 10-07-2009, 04:56 AM

Cliffs:

A female fails to think logically
The misc is shocked

**DAVEZILLA** · 10-07-2009, 04:58 AM

it's too early on the east coast to be reading all that ****...but I do agree with the cliffs...

**beauonly** · 10-07-2009, 05:03 AM

I'd like sources/refferences for some of those stats.

Just sayin.

**Agentdark45** · 10-07-2009, 05:07 AM

Originally Posted by IDZ

it's too early on the east coast to be reading all that ****...but I do agree with the cliffs...

Originally Posted by robbiez88

brb reading that....

NOT!

Originally Posted by beauonly

I'd like sources/refferences for some of those stats.

Just sayin.

Yeah I know it's a long post, but if I don't cover all angles to my argument she will simply pick up a small error in spelling / a minor point I didn't include / excluded, and negate the entire argument in typical female fashion when they can't think of a valid reply.

**beauonly** · 10-07-2009, 05:09 AM

Originally Posted by Agentdark45

Yeah I know it's a long post, but if I don't cover all angles to my argument she will simply pick up a small error in spelling / a minor point I didn't include / excluded, and negate the entire argument in typical female fashion when they can't think of a valid reply.

OOoohhhhhh... so what you're sayin' is:

AGENTDARK45 FTW ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !

**DB791** · 10-07-2009, 05:11 AM

Yeah, shes an idiot.

**CHOOSE** · 10-07-2009, 05:14 AM

lol unaware.

**saaltydog** · 10-07-2009, 05:14 AM

I approve of this thread.

**LeftNut** · 10-07-2009, 05:14 AM

Men watching porn and knocking one out over porn = Women fantasizing and going to town on themselves with their dildo. I.e both parties seeking sexual stimulation from external sources (Men are visually stimulated whilst Women are generally mentally) without compromising fidelity.

If this was a female dominated forum, would a Woman be posting similar pictures? If the answer is No she wouldn't then the reasoning as to why its being done on a Male dominated forum is transparent.

However if her and her BF don't have a problem with it then who gives a **** what kind of pictures she posts, the only person that will have to face what ever potential consequences of these particular actions would be is herself.

With that said though, the way I see it is if a girl wants to illicit attention and garner being sexually desired like a whore (yes porn stars are whores who exchange sex for money but with a camera there)... then you treat her like a whore and nothing more. Its what she wants from other Men and as such you give her what she wants.... it'd be selfish not to.

**beauonly** · 10-07-2009, 05:19 AM

Originally Posted by LeftNut

Men watching porn and knocking one out over porn = Women fantasizing and going to town on themselves with their dildo. I.e both parties seeking sexual stimulation from external sources (Men are visually stimulated whilst Women are generally mentally) without compromising fidelity.

If this was a female dominated forum, would a Woman be posting similar pictures? If the answer is No she wouldn't then the reasoning as to why its being done on a Male dominated forum is transparent.

However if her and her BF don't have a problem with it then who gives a **** what kind of pictures she posts, the only person that will have to face what ever potential consequences of these particular actions would be is herself.

With that said though, the way I see it is if a girl wants to illicit attention and garner being sexually desired like a whore (yes porn stars are whores who exchange sex for money but with a camera there)... then you treat her like a whore and nothing more. Its what she wants from other Men and as such you give her what she wants.... it'd be selfish not to.

WHOA WHOA WHOA man....

don't cloud the issue with facts!

**NDame616** · 10-07-2009, 06:08 AM

Originally Posted by Agentdark45

Clear your PM's!

According to you:

Men watching porn, in a relationship = a woman posting ass shots on a male dominated site on the internet, in a relationship.

Now if we break this down, what can be inferred from this statement is that you get your sexual kicks from men complimenting / you knowing men are jerking over your pics.

Now, your approach is an ACTIVE way of fullfilling your sexual / attention seeking desires. I.e you are exposing yourself ACTIVELY to get sexual pleasure / a feelgood factor.

A man watching porn is a PASSIVE way of fullfilling his sexual desires. He is not exposing himself in any way shape or form. His method of pleasure is derived purely from mental stimulation, of HIMSELF.

The critical difference between the two approaches? Your approach, sexually arouses OTHERS.

A man jerking it in his basement influences / affects no one else. You exposing your ass to 320940 males on the internet is in a completely different league. Your sexual arousal is directly dependant on the sexual arousal of LOTS of men fauning over you. How you can not see the difference between these two methods of self arousal is shocking.

Your method is no different to going out in the real world and actively flirting with numerous males (whom aren't your boyfriend). Why? Because the end result is the same. i.e sexual arousal from ass shots on the net = sexual arousal from IRL flirting. Because your sexual arousal in both cases is dependant on others.

If you think flirting (and by that I mean peaking sexual interest) with strangers in a relationship is acceptable, I feel sorry for your boyfriend.

Secondly, what is the limit to your arousal methods outside of your relationship? Why stop at clothed ass shots? If the underlying reasons and outcomes are the same, the method of arousal shouldn't matter aye sheduma??

If you are going to reply to this post, do not quote me out of context. It is written as a whole. You must counter ALL of my arguments in a LOGICAL and deducive manner. Do not answer my questions with new questions.

Cliffs:

Sheduma = attention whore (but won't admit it)

Whoever uses that ass shot as something to jerk to, fails at the internet.

**The.Truth** · 10-07-2009, 06:10 AM

Sheduma is an aging whore who wants to be desired, so the only thing she has to offer is that fat ass of hers. It's a typical female trait.

**Loswaldo** · 10-07-2009, 06:10 AM

She is a woman, of course her logic is dissapoint.

**Uncontested** · 10-07-2009, 06:12 AM

in b4 *******ry white knights defending yet another dumb whore.

**Agentdark45** · 10-07-2009, 06:23 AM

Originally Posted by Uncontested

in b4 *******ry white knights defending yet another dumb whore.

Last thread started off like this, surprised she or whiteknights haven't shown up as yet.

**Masknight** · 10-07-2009, 06:28 AM

amcurioustoseewhatshesayscausethatassishotbutifshe doesitforattentionthensheisflirting.jpg

wait wut

**RandomMisc** · 10-07-2009, 06:31 AM

Fail logic is fail.

And yes, she obviously is an attention whore... so stop giving her what she craves!

**EctoMan2000** · 10-07-2009, 06:37 AM

If you really object to her behavior then the best course for action would be to ignore it entirely. I'm sure she got off on the amount of people debating her actions as much as she did people seeing said photo. If the so called 'black knights' ignored this sh*t that thread would have been the same 10 or so people fawning over her and that would have been the end of it.

If Sheduma reads this, honestly, do whatever the fuk you want. I don't know you

**captainhorseboy** · 10-07-2009, 06:39 AM

peak != pique

**magog704** · 10-07-2009, 06:42 AM

Originally Posted by captainhorseboy

peak != pique

peak is an acceptable spelling of pique these days, not sure if you were srs or not.

**YuMadThough** · 10-07-2009, 06:46 AM

I didnt read but i agree with the OP mainly because he has a penis and 99% of the time the person with the penis is right more so than the person with the vagina.

**Westboarder** · 10-07-2009, 06:51 AM

Originally Posted by magog704

peak is an acceptable spelling of pique these days, not sure if you were srs or not.

peak 1 |p?k|
noun
the pointed top of a mountain : the snowy peaks rose against the blue of a cloudless sky.
? a mountain, esp. one with a pointed top : the rocky outcrops of peaks such as the Cassongrat offer a challenge to rock climbers.
? a projecting pointed part or shape : whisk 2 egg whites to stiff peaks.
? a point in a curve or on a graph, or a value of a physical quantity, higher than those around it : a slight increase in velocity provides a second peak on the general velocity curve.
? the point of highest activity, quality, or achievement : anyone who saw Jones at his peak looked upon genius.
? chiefly Brit. a stiff brim at the front of a cap.
? the narrow part of a ship's hold at the bow or stern.
? the upper, outer corner of a sail extended by a gaff.
verb [ intrans. ]
reach a highest point, either of a specified value or at a specified time : its popularity peaked in the 1940s | the rate of increase peaked at 34 percent last autumn.
adjective [ attrib. ]
greatest; maximum : he did not expect to be anywhere near peak fitness until Christmas.
? characterized by maximum activity or demand : at peak hours, traffic speeds are reduced considerably.
DERIVATIVES
peaky |?piki| adjective
peakiness |-k?nis| |?pikin1s| noun
ORIGIN mid 16th cent.: probably a back-formation from peaked, variant of dialect picked [pointed.]
peak 2 |pik| |pi?k|
verb [ intrans. ] archaic
decline in health and spirits; waste away.
ORIGIN early 17th cent. : of unknown origin. The phrase peak and pine derives its currency from Shakespeare.

vs.

pique |pēk|
noun
a feeling of irritation or resentment resulting from a slight, esp. to one's pride : he left in a fit of pique.
verb ( piques |pēks| |piks|, piqued |pēkt| |pikt|, piquing |ˈpēki ng | |pikɪŋ|)
1 [ trans. ] stimulate (interest or curiosity) : you have piqued my curiosity about the man.
2 ( be piqued) feel irritated or resentful : she was piqued by his curtness.
3 ( pique oneself) archaic pride oneself.
ORIGIN mid 16th cent. (denoting animosity between two or more people): from French piquer ?prick, irritate.?
piqu? |pēˈkā; pi-| |piˈkeɪ| |ˈpiːkeɪ|
noun
stiff fabric, typically cotton, woven in a strongly ribbed or raised pattern.
ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: from French, literally ?backstitched,? past participle of piquer.

Translation: Eh... NO. It's not

**5x10** · 10-07-2009, 06:56 AM

women and logic mix like water and oil

**RedSoxfan1978** · 10-07-2009, 06:57 AM

Originally Posted by Agentdark45

Clear your PM's!

According to you:

Men watching porn, in a relationship = a woman posting ass shots on a male dominated site on the internet, in a relationship.

Now if we break this down, what can be inferred from this statement is that you get your sexual kicks from men complimenting / you knowing men are jerking over your pics.

Now, your approach is an ACTIVE way of fullfilling your sexual / attention seeking desires. I.e you are exposing yourself ACTIVELY to get sexual pleasure / a feelgood factor.

A man watching porn is a PASSIVE way of fullfilling his sexual desires. He is not exposing himself in any way shape or form. His method of pleasure is derived purely from mental stimulation, of HIMSELF.

The critical difference between the two approaches? Your approach, sexually arouses OTHERS.

A man jerking it in his basement influences / affects no one else. You exposing your ass to 320940 males on the internet is in a completely different league. Your sexual arousal is directly dependant on the sexual arousal of LOTS of men fauning over you. How you can not see the difference between these two methods of self arousal is shocking.

Your method is no different to going out in the real world and actively flirting with numerous males (whom aren't your boyfriend). Why? Because the end result is the same. i.e sexual arousal from ass shots on the net = sexual arousal from IRL flirting. Because your sexual arousal in both cases is dependant on others.

If you think flirting (and by that I mean peaking sexual interest) with strangers in a relationship is acceptable, I feel sorry for your boyfriend.

Secondly, what is the limit to your arousal methods outside of your relationship? Why stop at clothed ass shots? If the underlying reasons and outcomes are the same, the method of arousal shouldn't matter aye sheduma??

If you are going to reply to this post, do not quote me out of context. It is written as a whole. You must counter ALL of my arguments in a LOGICAL and deducive manner. Do not answer my questions with new questions.

Cliffs:

Sheduma = attention whore (but won't admit it)

While you make valid and interesting points, in the end none if it will matter. Simply because women are ALWAYS right in their minds. They were born with an ax wound, and THAT gives them superiority over you and I, and the other few billion people with a penis on this planet.

You will never be countered with LOGIC from any women, everything they do is done on raw emotion. They can not be reasoned with, or bargained with. They dont feel pity, or remorse or fear. They are women, and they will not stop, EVER... That is a terrific film and that line very well applies to women. They dont think about things and feel the way men do.

Im mostly joking, but seriously do not expect to ever have a LOGICAL argument from a women. You might as well try to empty the ocean with a bucket.

**BobisMighty** · 10-07-2009, 06:58 AM

**jafomofo** · 10-07-2009, 06:59 AM

shes a standard issue post feminist. no surprise here.

Thread: Sheduma's logic is dissapoint.

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Sheduma's logic is dissapoint.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions