To recap 2-Diphenylmethylpyrrolidine is the identification of the drug found in SX under the proprietary blend of 4-aminoslim as per the chemistry work of beej and PA
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-Diphe...hylpyrrolidine)
I wanted to create one thread where one could find all the available safety info of that compound free of all drama (even if I understand very little is available). We are still waiting of official word of AX while they are doing test on their side too.
This is what I expect in this thread
1) Serious data (if there's any available)
2) Translation into layman term
3) Other genuine safety question.
Just to clarify:
As of best knowledge for now .. not there's no amphetamine or meth in SX.
-------
I might start with a quote from Ptto and a link to the serious thread at blueligth
http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/showthrea...67#post7529667Originally Posted by Otto
I'll add more information as I find them
|
-
09-28-2009, 04:43 PM #1
Let's discuss safety of 2-Diphenylmethylpyrrolidine (Possible drug found in SX )
-
09-28-2009, 04:52 PM #2
Possible cardiovascular toxixity
http://jmt.pennpress.org/strands/jmt...03_167_169.pdf
(all the post is a quote, none are from me but the selection of paragraph to quote, this is for D2PM and not 2-DPMP (again they differ by one OH), If i quoted to much feel free to adjust)
Case Report: A male patient with no risk factors for ischemic heart disease, presented to our emergency department with agitation and chest pain characteristic of ischemia following the ingestion of two units of ?Head Candy.? He improved with oral diazepam over a period of 12 hours and there was no biochemical evidence of myocardial damage. Serum analysis demonstrated the presence
of diphenylprolinol (diphenyl-2-pyrrolidinemethanol [D2PM]) and glaucine at concentrations of 0.17 mg/L and 0.10 mg/L, respectively. No other recreational drugs were detected in an extensive toxicological screen of blood and urine samples.
Discussion: This is the first reported case of confirmed toxicity associated with recreational use of diphenylprolinol in combination with glaucine. In our view, this case provides further support for the need for a systematic approach to toxicological screening of patients with recreational drug toxicity to identify emerging drugs and provide evidence for legislative authorities to assist in revising the legal status of recreational drugs.
CASE REPORT (long)
A 21-year-old male nonsmoker with no significant past medical
history arrived following ingestion of 3 tablets of ?Head Candy?
purchased in a local street shop. After ingestion, he felt mildly
euphoric for several hours, but as the effects were wearing off he
had two ?sniffs? of ?poppers? (usually n-butyl nitrite, isobutyl
nitrite or a mixture of the two). Approximately 1 hour later he
became dizzy and developed right-sided chest pain and associated
right-arm heaviness, consistent with ischemic chest pain, which
lasted for 1 hour. He went to the emergency department (ED)
approximately 2 hours after the chest discomfort resolved. He
was not on any regular medications, there was no family history
of note, and although he was a regular user of ?herbal highs?,
there was no previous use of *******
On review by the Clinical Toxicology team the
following morning, he was asymptomatic
A patent application for D2PM reported that both the R()
and S() isomers of D2PM have been shown to have activity at
the ******* binding site on the dopamine transporter protein
[10]. This patent application suggests that these molecules may
be useful in treating ******* addiction, since although they bind
to this ******* binding site with comparable Kibinding to *******,
the Kiuptake is significantly higher, suggesting that they have little
biological activity.Last edited by Pho3NiX; 09-28-2009 at 05:09 PM.
-
09-28-2009, 04:59 PM #3
http://www.tciamerica.com/catalog/it...clang=en&cip=1
Well TCI America sell 2-DPMP as a proline analog
Prolines and its analogs
D3185 (2R,5R)-2,5-Diphenylpyrrolidine
D3186 (2S,5S)-2,5-Diphenylpyrrolidine
D3803 (R)-(+)-2-(Diphenylmethyl)pyrrolidine
D2365 (R)-(+)-alpha,alpha-Diphenyl-2-pyrrolidinemethanol
[...]
110$ / gram ....
-
09-28-2009, 05:11 PM #4
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Location: County Donegal, Ireland
- Posts: 8,160
- Rep Power: 51203
Keep in mind, one of the metabolites (if not the ONLY metabolite) of 2-diphenylmethylpyrrolidine is its hydroxylated metabolite diphenylprolinol. One of the key features of peripheral adrenergic (alpha and beta) activity is a hydroxyl in the beta-position, which explains the apparent cardiotoxicity.
twitter: @bullexinferis
-
-
09-28-2009, 05:21 PM #5
good stuff.
If you read the other thread on this substance you will find more data from rc drug forums including a 'study' made by dutch smartshop. Result: substance was dropped because of too many adverse efects, especially cardiovascular effects.
On top of that, if this drug is a DAT NAT inhibitor, then it might be associated with some of the known psychotogenic effects, it might case cerebrovacular spasms, ultimately leading to cerebral strokes (thx to neuron who pointed this out), it might accelerate atherosclerosis, it might lead to skyrocketing cortisol levels, and it might impair memory and it might have neurotoxic effects. Did i mention that it might cause cardial arrhythmia and increase blood pressure.
All these effects are absolutely possible, however, nobody can tell their frequency and severity, since there are Zero clinical studies, let alone post marketing seurveillance data on it.
-
09-28-2009, 05:32 PM #6
I'll add this google custom search
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&c...%3Ayo-c3aa2fy4
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&c...%3Ayo-c3aa2fy4
tons of usage report... smoked ingested etcLast edited by Pho3NiX; 09-28-2009 at 05:37 PM.
-
09-28-2009, 05:34 PM #7
-
09-28-2009, 05:42 PM #8
So in english ... when you digest 2-DPMP you can naturally form the other drug
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diphenylprolinol wich have shown cardiovascular toxicity
Can I ask how the hydroxyl in beta position explain the cardiotoxicity ?
It's not exactly a one-two punch for me...
Does it have anything to do with sympathomimetic features ?Last edited by Pho3NiX; 09-28-2009 at 05:47 PM.
-
-
09-28-2009, 05:45 PM #9
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: The Shadow World, Valhalla, Norway
- Posts: 15,530
- Rep Power: 20267
Since it strikes me that this particular element is most similar to the street drug "crank", I think that is where I would look if I were interested in making comparisons. There is a great deal of thought among users that usage of this drug is preferable to others, such as coke, because they believe crank (either crystal or liquid meth -- the term seems to be applied to them both about equally, though I'd look more to crystal, since the liquid is not particularly stable over time) is muscle-sparing in that it will trigger the body to burn fat for the vast amounts of energy, nervous and otherwise, that it consumes while under the influence of the drug.
All of the things Dr. P has mentioned have clinically been noted repeatedly in crank users and it additionally is highly destructive of nerve endings. It is also highly addictive, an aspect which I believe would need to be modulated in order to be useful as a dietary supplement. The one question I would have is the cortisol levels, unless they are ineffectual due to the body consuming more mass than the body's ability to attempt to modulate the caloric expenditure. Too much of it and the neurotoxic effects render dopamine and serotonin able to be transmitted but not received. This would also need to be modulated as would the typical tendency towards violence of those coming off of the drug.
This is asking a great deal of any supplement company to try to lessen or negate entirely the incredibly stunning side effects of this particular drug, but those who are interested in safety as well as long-term implications, I strongly advise you to educate yourself on the street drug which it may or may not be patterned after, but which it mostly strongly resembles chemically...at least in my view.Ongoing Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=106420991
Come here and open your mouth, S103/Syntrax, I gotta take a piss: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3569901
-
09-28-2009, 05:49 PM #10
-
09-28-2009, 05:58 PM #11
-
09-28-2009, 06:42 PM #12
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: New Zealand
- Age: 33
- Posts: 2,747
- Rep Power: 4535
-
-
09-28-2009, 06:57 PM #13
-
09-28-2009, 07:00 PM #14
Can you clarify on this ?
I tried searching for it but what i have found is that crank is a low grade meth wich is quite different from what we have here
Unless you have ADD/ADHD or any other trouble and self-medicamented yourself with SX you shoud be fine. There's been one report of amphetamine like withdrawal reaction on AM. Just to be on the safe side try to stop cold turkey and if anything go wrong take half a cap and go slowly.Last edited by Pho3NiX; 09-28-2009 at 07:04 PM.
-
09-28-2009, 07:08 PM #15
-
09-28-2009, 07:44 PM #16
-
-
09-28-2009, 08:13 PM #17
-
09-28-2009, 08:13 PM #18
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: The Shadow World, Valhalla, Norway
- Posts: 15,530
- Rep Power: 20267
Like all street drugs, it varies in quality, depending on the source. Crank/ice/methamphetamine has been around a long time, well over a century and people have been trying to use it, or its derivations (which this is arguably one of), since that time. It is also arguably the first "designer stimulant".
Like everyone, my guess is based on conjecture, but in poking around in the various research that has been assembled on this particular item, it is most reminiscent to me of crystal meth, which is reasonable, given the aforementioned reputation it carries for muscle-sparing, though I'm not convinced this is a well-founded or even accurate reputation for it to have. It might be closer overall to one of the ADHD drugs available out there, which themselves bear a certain resemblance to methamphetamine.
Keep in mind that this is my very unscientific appraisal and if you wish to dismiss it on that basis, I will not object.Ongoing Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=106420991
Come here and open your mouth, S103/Syntrax, I gotta take a piss: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3569901
-
09-28-2009, 10:00 PM #19
-
09-28-2009, 10:03 PM #20
due to the long and sustained action of this drug, and its proposed 'partial agonist' mode of action at DAT NAT, neither addiction nor severe withdrawal symptoms should be too much of an issue. Hence its proposed use for the treatment of ******* addiction.
However, in case that this what i just said is correct, propensity for addiction and withdrawal most likely will depend largely on the dose. This is based on the observation that high doses much closer resemble amphetamine like effects and might thus lead to similae adverse effects.
-
-
09-28-2009, 10:11 PM #21
Ya, I am sure your mind plays a large role in it. Many people started reporting hypochondriac like symptoms within hours of hearing of this possible mystery compound. Not saying that this is you or that there aren't legitimate symptoms for some, but it is definitely in human nature to start "feeling" things once our brain tells us that we should/could.
-
09-28-2009, 10:59 PM #22
-
09-28-2009, 11:11 PM #23
this works in the opposite direction as well. many people might have neglected apparent symptoms or suppressed to report them because all the good bros and the mob told them that everything is safe and that it does not cause any problems.
Actually, wasn't a certain individual (wink wink) quick to shoot on anybody who dared to say anything potentially negative? ("jealous competitors" or "drama queens" or "people who want to get known for saving teh world" (you remember kathy?))....
But back on topic. DAT-NAT inhibitors such as ******* (and diphenylprolinol?) have the ability to exacerbate or to trigger psychoses.
Here some recent anecdotal feedback on that:
http://anabolicminds.com/forum/suppl...ml#post2145737Last edited by DR_P; 09-28-2009 at 11:48 PM.
-
09-29-2009, 06:07 AM #24
-
-
09-29-2009, 06:24 AM #25
Often people don't connect the dots until after the fact when it all makes sense. Anyways, you fnf are still here defending AX for some reason. You can't speak for everyone else with a post like that saying it is all power of suggestion. I am after finding many older posts here and elsewhere showing people complain of the sides listed above in this thread as well as many more. Some even had threads on their experience and felt ill from using it and this was before it was discussed of what was in the product.
A comprehensive compilation of reported effects and symptoms:
- 12+ hours of appetite eradication
- extremely increased "mental energy"
- extremely increased drive to work
- insomina
- slight euphoria
- significant anxiogenic effects
- dry mouth
- dose-dependent teeth clinching / grinding
- hypervigilance
- tachycardia
I have also posted of my increased heart rate much above normal while running here before it was mentioned what was in SX. Using a highly accurate Garmin heart rate monitor, my heart rate was more than 10bpm higher while already at a high level of work... 170-175bpm being my usual avg for the intensity over 10km, it was up to 180-190bpm and I didn't have a good run at all... feeling overheated, etc...
If you want to talk about placebo or power of suggestion then I was expecting it to IMPROVE my time and help me in my run for energy, etc... like many energy products do, caffeine, ephedra, 1,3 Dimeth, etc.. Obviously this did not and there was little question whenever I ran or worked out and was hoping SX helped my performance... It was the reason I bought it actually. I don't see why anyone would want a supplement to give them energy that would decrease their performance. Many took SX under the understanding it was safe and expected it to help them in some form which is why they bought it, but have posted well before this past week of their negative side effects. There is little doubt from everything that has been said that SX can have negative effects beyond power of suggestion... these are real and many questions need to be addressed by AX. Likely there are many, many people out there using SX now who have no idea this could be dangerous and there doesn't seem to be anyone who cares.Last edited by Peter LeDrew; 09-29-2009 at 06:31 AM.
-
09-29-2009, 08:06 AM #26
-
09-29-2009, 04:31 PM #27
-
09-29-2009, 04:33 PM #28
-
-
09-29-2009, 04:43 PM #29
I want to know why you are so hell-bent on defending AX.
Here's where the situation is right now - NO ONE FCUKING KNOWS. But you can't tell me that AX pulling the plug on producing this is sending any kind of positive message about their assertions that SX is safe.
You're not an AX rep, yet you constantly defend the company like you are. You want us to give them the 'benefit of the doubt'??? They should give their customers a little more security than 'it's safe, you're all wrong'. They have done NOTHING to prove that this is safe.
As a matter of fact, Big Smith said 'a couple of days' MAX for their responses. Well, that time frame has come and gone. And guess what? NOTHING from the company.
Don't sit here and say that these people are being 'hypochondriacs'. How many times does someone develop a cough and say 'Oh, it's just a cold' when it's something much more severe?
You can't put the puzzle together until you have all the pieces. Maybe these people overlooked the way they felt. Maybe they thought it was just this, or just that. Who knows. All I know is that until AX gives anyone a reason to believe otherwise, people should stop insinuating that it's in people's heads. AX is responsible for putting these thoughts in people's heads by remaining silent on a VERY big deal.
/rant.Originally Posted by c00ki3m0nst3r - ...I just want straight answear they do the same thing damage your liver your penis your body your change to have babies who is more side effects and who has more danger ?
-
10-03-2009, 11:59 AM #30
i am trying to figure out what this product is about and everytime you are defending them. I took this product and now its pulled, what am I suppose to think? you say you say neutral but any claim that this product may have negative effects there you are. How involved are you with this company? I thought you were just a rep online then offline its a whole different life but it seems I am wrong. I am waiting for AX response but it doesn't seem its coming anytime soon. Your responses are definitely making me rage. At least these guys are coming up with answers that they are trying to back up. If this product could have toxic effects, I want to ****ing know.
Similar Threads
-
Let's Discuss Cut/Bulk
By TheManofSteel in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 12Last Post: 04-16-2011, 11:26 AM -
Another Promising Drug found by scientists to loose fat
By bhasi in forum Losing FatReplies: 3Last Post: 09-12-2006, 07:55 AM
Bookmarks