What would it take someone to get their jump up to 40"? Discuss Please.
|
Thread: Becoming a 40" Jumper...
-
07-02-2006, 12:35 AM #1
-
07-02-2006, 03:47 AM #2
-
07-02-2006, 06:16 AM #3
honestly.. if your not born with it you can NOT accomplish that. Im not here to shut you down or anything but its sooo hard to do if you do not have fast twitch muscle fiber genetics. Unless your born with a raw 32" vertical, its gonna be raelly hard to bring it up anymore then 8 inches to the 40 range
-
07-02-2006, 07:48 AM #4
-
-
07-02-2006, 08:04 AM #5
Yeah, I say...**** genetics. If you want that 40" vertical, WORK YOUR @SS OFF. Through heavy lifting and a good plyometric program (in combination with good diet and rest) you can definitely do it. If that is a goal or dream of yours don't let these people tell you differently. Come back with that 40" vertical on video and make these guys eat their genetics. You can do it man, get yourself in some strength shoes (yes, they work) and start jumping for the rim on the basketball hoop. I have personally taken my vert. from 23 to 33 inches through training and there is no one that will stop me from jumping higher. re
EDIT, I just read your weight. I have NEVER heard of anyone over 250 with a vertical at or over 38". You might think about cutting to an athletic bodyfat percentage (5-12%).Last edited by GrantZilla; 07-02-2006 at 08:08 AM.
"When you 'hit the wall' - hit it so hard as to leave no wall."
--GrantZilla
-
07-02-2006, 06:10 PM #6
-
07-02-2006, 06:15 PM #7
-
07-02-2006, 06:24 PM #8
-
-
07-02-2006, 06:47 PM #9
-
07-02-2006, 06:55 PM #10
Jevon Kearse'snickname is th freak. And you have to be a freak of nature to be a good DE. They are gentically superior and they ahve been training for far longer than you. They can hire the best money can buy to train them. It erally is gentics and hardwork. I know a guy who only played 3 years of high school football. When he first started he was at the mid 20's. Now a junior in college has around a 44 inch VJ.
-
07-02-2006, 07:06 PM #11
-
07-02-2006, 07:32 PM #12
not true , ask kelly Bagget, he was born with a ****ty 21 inch vert , and at one point brought it up too 40 or 42 or something like that but deff in the 40's. Even through injuries and setbacks he got there. If you have a goal dont let these haters who tell themselves its impossible to bring up your vert more than 8 inches to save themselves hard work.
-
-
07-03-2006, 04:09 AM #13
jump
Originally Posted by Capy
-
07-03-2006, 04:57 AM #14
-
07-03-2006, 06:04 AM #15
Speaking of Kelly Bagget, I was just reading an interview earlier today. He has some very interesting points and states something that every athlete needs to understand...you have to improve strength in order to become more explosive, to go faster, jump higher, swing faster, throw farther, etc. Strength is the foundation that has to be built in order to gain improvement in other aspects.
His actual quote is, "Strength is the backbone upon which all the other qualities of strength reside (explosive strength, reactive strength, strength endurance etc.)"
All athletes need to realize this and spend time improving strength!
Here is the link to the interview.
http://www.wannabebig.com/printartic...?articleid=228
-
07-03-2006, 06:36 AM #16
-
-
07-03-2006, 07:20 AM #17
-
07-03-2006, 07:42 AM #18
-
07-03-2006, 08:09 AM #19Originally Posted by Capy
I am with the party of people that think you need good genetics to jump 40". A legit 40" STANDING vertical, that is. Not everybody can become as powerful as the O-lifters. Off a run I can get almost 35", but my standing vertical is probably around 28". A legit 40" vertical is RARE.
-
07-03-2006, 08:17 AM #20
-
-
07-03-2006, 09:27 AM #21
-
07-03-2006, 09:35 AM #22
Don't listen to the haters. That's all they are. Mark Henry who was at one time the worlds strongest man not exactly sure of his stats but around 350 pounds dunked a basketball. You will have to work and believe you can do it and picture it in your mind but it is possible. You just have to set your goal and take effective action and not let anything interfere with it.
"To be successful you have to be selfish, or else you never achieve. And once you get to your highest level, then you have to be unselfish. Stay reachable. Stay in touch. Don't isolate."
-Michael Jordan
-
07-03-2006, 10:40 AM #23Originally Posted by Capy
Get your max ATG squat up to 3x bodyweight. After that, any more squatting strength will probably hinder you, not help you.
Then, start cycling in plyos. Eventually, you're gonna want to move into doing depth jumps, but not at first. Play lots of basketball and just practice jumping for awhile. After that stops helping you, do plyos such as bounding, broad jumps, etc. Also, do short sprints.
As for weightlifting, increasing on the O-lifts is a MUST. Find yourself a GOOD coach to teach you the lifts. Take months to master them. It will be worth it. Get your snatch and clean and jerk up to within 100 pounds of the world record of your weightclass. Also, I recommend that you do push jerks, not split jerks.
As for other weightlifting things, glute ham raises will help you. However, the two exercises I'd recommend the most are jump squats and peterson step ups. Jud Logan greatly advocates the peterson step ups, and there are numerous studies showing the benefits of jump squats.
When you progress up to doing depth drops up to 10' (some O-lifters back in the day did 20'), then you'll be more than ready to do depth jumps. That should help you as well.
Never be afraid to test your strength deficit and see what you should work on.
Also, a VERY knowledgable strength coach told me that he believes with all else being equal, he can increase somebody's vertical just by improving their balance and stability. Besides that, having good flexibility will help you greatly as well, so research PNF and active isolated stretching.
Of course, you also want a low bodyfat percentage.
And that's all the advice you can possibly need. No book or program you buy will help you any more than what I just told you, most likely. A lot of people talk about Kelly Bagget. I've never read his stuff, so I won't comment on it. However, just cause he figured out what works for him doesn't mean it'll work for everybody else. Remember that; just cause it works for him doesn't mean it'll work for you. Much, MUCH better idea to educate yourself. It isn't that hard.
-
07-03-2006, 01:31 PM #24Originally Posted by Heisman2
Genentically I have a 30" vertical or so. I have mananged to get 36" through hard work. The next 4 inches will be exponentially as hard as the last (as I have found)Height: 6'1"
Weight: 175lbs
BF%: 6%
Vertical: 36"
40 Yard: 4.46 FAT
B.S. Chemistry
B.S. Microbiology
If I could choose one thing to talk about regarding strength training, it's that LESS = MORE.
Discipline, Motivation and Common Sense
-
-
07-03-2006, 01:32 PM #25Originally Posted by Heisman2
A 3x's squat would probably be just as hard or harder to attain then the 40" vertical for most people. Most would probably be served just as well by having a 2x's bodyweight squat, or even slightly below that, at least in my opinion.
Peterson step ups get my two thumbs up, I've talked about them on here before with luke warm response, they are great for strengthening the VMO, which will help the knee track properly. I do them consistently and they have helped me greatly. Bagget talks about squatting below parallel to further activate the VMO.
I don't think that 10' depth drops is necessary, I haven't read any research on it, but would love to if you have some. As far as depth jumps, they should be incorporated after a cycle of lead up plyos (like you mentioned above), and according to Bompa the optimal height is between 30" and 43".
Olympic lifts will obviously help greatly, but I doubt that getting your 1RM for them within 100 lbs of the world record is an absolute. That would be another unbelievabley difficult task, that would take years and years of training.
Regarding testing your strength deficit, you hit the nail on the head when it comes to jumping, the jump lasts around .2 seconds (according to Bagget), so you obviously need to create a lot of force really fast. In his book (I just purchased the ebook today to see what it was all about, I don't have a real desire to improve my vertical) he discusses how to determine whether you need to improve in general strength, or reactive strength through plyos. Of course the plyos (and speed-strength) will be the key to improving explosive strength.
Like I stated above, you gave a bunch of good advice, but it isn't all the advice you could need, it is an outline as to how hard increasing to a 40" vertical would be, and you list some important information and exercises, but it is just a start.
I haven't read a lot of stuff on improving vertical, but had read some of Bagget's articles and he takes an approach that is based on solid principles, not all that gimmicky crap, so I do have respect for his work. It obviously worked for him, but as he explains it was based on years of research and following certain principles, so in that respect it should work for most everybody at least in varying degrees. He also has a variety of tests for each athlete to take which will lead them to his/her most effective program. I'm kind of sounding like a salesman here, I'm not by any means (I doubt I will ever even do the program), but I would suggest reading some of his articles.
Although I don't exactly agree with the context in your above response, I applaud you completely for stating "Much, much better idea to educate yourself." If only everyone would do that, once I put it on myself to go out and find excellent resources in regard to strength/sports training, my knowledge has increased 10 fold easily. And you are right, it isn't that hard, but finding the right resources sometimes is!
-
07-03-2006, 03:00 PM #26
Great post bro. Let me just say that in case anything I say comes out sounding negative towards you at all, since I have a tendency to do that, and I don't have any actual problem with anything you posted.
Originally Posted by Zac Robinson
A 3x's squat would probably be just as hard or harder to attain then the 40" vertical for most people. Most would probably be served just as well by having a 2x's bodyweight squat, or even slightly below that, at least in my opinion.
Peterson step ups get my two thumbs up, I've talked about them on here before with luke warm response, they are great for strengthening the VMO, which will help the knee track properly. I do them consistently and they have helped me greatly. Bagget talks about squatting below parallel to further activate the VMO.
I don't think that 10' depth drops is necessary, I haven't read any research on it, but would love to if you have some. As far as depth jumps, they should be incorporated after a cycle of lead up plyos (like you mentioned above), and according to Bompa the optimal height is between 30" and 43".
As for the optimal height, I've read that you want to do them so that your rebound jump is as high as your normal standing vertical, and I've read stuff that agrees your 30"-43" range.
Also, on an aside, I need to purchase Bompa's book.
Olympic lifts will obviously help greatly, but I doubt that getting your 1RM for them within 100 lbs of the world record is an absolute. That would be another unbelievabley difficult task, that would take years and years of training.
Regarding testing your strength deficit, you hit the nail on the head when it comes to jumping, the jump lasts around .2 seconds (according to Bagget), so you obviously need to create a lot of force really fast. In his book (I just purchased the ebook today to see what it was all about, I don't have a real desire to improve my vertical) he discusses how to determine whether you need to improve in general strength, or reactive strength through plyos. Of course the plyos (and speed-strength) will be the key to improving explosive strength.
Like I stated above, you gave a bunch of good advice, but it isn't all the advice you could need, it is an outline as to how hard increasing to a 40" vertical would be, and you list some important information and exercises, but it is just a start.
I haven't read a lot of stuff on improving vertical, but had read some of Bagget's articles and he takes an approach that is based on solid principles, not all that gimmicky crap, so I do have respect for his work. It obviously worked for him, but as he explains it was based on years of research and following certain principles, so in that respect it should work for most everybody at least in varying degrees. He also has a variety of tests for each athlete to take which will lead them to his/her most effective program. I'm kind of sounding like a salesman here, I'm not by any means (I doubt I will ever even do the program), but I would suggest reading some of his articles.
Although I don't exactly agree with the context in your above response, I applaud you completely for stating "Much, much better idea to educate yourself." If only everyone would do that, once I put it on myself to go out and find excellent resources in regard to strength/sports training, my knowledge has increased 10 fold easily. And you are right, it isn't that hard, but finding the right resources sometimes is!
-
07-03-2006, 08:00 PM #27
"Speaking of Kelly Bagget, I was just reading an interview earlier today. He has some very interesting points and states something that every athlete needs to understand...you have to improve strength in order to become more explosive, to go faster, jump higher, swing faster, throw farther, etc. Strength is the foundation that has to be built in order to gain improvement in other aspects.
His actual quote is, "Strength is the backbone upon which all the other qualities of strength reside (explosive strength, reactive strength, strength endurance etc.)"
All athletes need to realize this and spend time improving strength!
Here is the link to the interview.
http://www.wannabebig.com/printartic...?articleid=228"
Okay, so if you have to be strong to jump high, explain why Michael Jordan, Kobe, etc aren't huge.
Look at MJ's legs in this pic. He wasn't exactly swole but he had ridiculous hangtime back then:
http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/sport...e/s_jordan.jpg
Not necessarily directed at you, but that goes back to my point that genetics determine your body's potential and how far you can go. For example, the human body cannot run 100m in under 9 seconds. It doesn't matter how badly you "want it" it just can't be done.
I know I can't have a vert over 50 inches even though I want one. In 8th grade it was 28 and I've slowly worked my way up to 33', and I probably have 40+ potential, but 50+ is not happening.
Bottom line is, everybody's potential is different, and your potential is determined by certain components you are born with.
-
07-03-2006, 08:29 PM #28
-
-
07-03-2006, 09:23 PM #29
Heisman2, thanks a lot... awesome post... it seems you have to push people to get information out of them so im sorry if i got you mad at all... but thanks a lot for the post now we have this as a refference as we see the countless Vertical Jumping posts...
Positive posts please, or don't bother posting.
(it's pretty simple people, be respectful.)
-
07-03-2006, 11:38 PM #30Originally Posted by ajn
Bookmarks