I heard about this product from a web page. It supposedly makes your bicep exercises much more efficent. I was wondering if anyone has ever used it. Does it work?
|
Thread: Bicep Isolator?
-
11-19-2002, 06:03 PM #1
-
11-19-2002, 06:10 PM #2
-
11-19-2002, 06:17 PM #3
-
11-20-2002, 12:37 AM #4
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: Malben, Orstraylya, Burkina Faso
- Age: 39
- Posts: 2,022
- Rep Power: 3221
r u talking about an arm blaster?
((((()-----------((((()
http://www.********.com/skinnyaaroncurtis
Calorie Surplus + Progressive Overload x Years Training = Continuous Gains. UMAD GH15?
"My BeNcH pReSs BrInGs All ThE GirLs To ThE yArD, n ThEy'Re LiKe, YoUr PeCs ArE LaRgE, dAmN rIgHt My PeCs ArE LaRgE, u CaN tOuCh ThEm, bUt IlL hAvE tO cHaRgE."
-
-
11-20-2002, 01:40 PM #5
TRY THIS! Trust me, it's a great bicep isolation excersise, and it really works. I actually use it in place of isolation curls.
When you are curling, stick your elbows in your abs, not just locked by your side, but actually with your elbows right in front of you on top of your abs about 5" - 6" apart. They're great, and they really keep you from cheating.
Just trust me, and try them.
-
11-20-2002, 04:26 PM #6
I friggin hate the arm blasters. its uncomfortable and i didnt fell any real difference. Standard stand curls did more for me. Try brother curls with a friend. go from 9 down to 1 and then back up in sets. Ex first set 9 they switch to friend and the when they finish that set go to 8 and so on and so on.
"Shut the F... Up and Train."
"When it comes to bodybuilding, hardcore is more. It's a mentality, a way of life" -AnimalPak.com
When I step foot to my locker and change my shoes for training, it's like turning on a switch. I become a creature, not a human. I look to tear apart anyone and everyone in my way to hugeness and I don't care how I do it. I can feel my heart start jumping and my body saying "Beat me into the ground like a red-headed step child, I want punishment.
I want to be a freak, a FREAK I TELL YOU!"
FuLL_BoRe is not just a name its the way i train.
-
11-20-2002, 04:28 PM #7
-
11-20-2002, 05:24 PM #8
-
-
11-21-2002, 04:42 PM #9
-
11-21-2002, 05:09 PM #10
-
11-21-2002, 06:08 PM #11
-
11-21-2002, 06:46 PM #12
Aetolos when you have your elbows against your abs you are actually cutting the range of motion of the exercize and providing a surface to help you apply force against. This gives you more leverage so you can lift more. Putting your elbows against your abs is a natrual tendency so that isn't bad necessarily.
-
-
11-22-2002, 01:08 AM #13
-
11-22-2002, 02:12 PM #14
-
11-22-2002, 06:31 PM #15Originally posted by firstmark
Aetolos when you have your elbows against your abs you are actually cutting the range of motion of the exercize and providing a surface to help you apply force against. This gives you more leverage so you can lift more. Putting your elbows against your abs is a natrual tendency so that isn't bad necessarily.Last edited by Aetolos; 11-22-2002 at 06:35 PM.
-
11-23-2002, 06:42 AM #16
-
-
11-23-2002, 06:51 AM #17
Putting your elbows in your abs CAN'T be good for your joints, even just holding them without weight is uncomfortable. Anyway, you _could_ still rock with your elbow in your abs. Best thing to do is just not ****ing cheat, if your that concerned... then don't! simple. There are many techniques which don't break your arms, lock your elbows into the wall, preacher curl and do slow perfect reps...
-
11-23-2002, 07:18 AM #18Originally posted by xTorsyon
Putting your elbows in your abs CAN'T be good for your joints, even just holding them without weight is uncomfortable. Anyway, you _could_ still rock with your elbow in your abs. Best thing to do is just not ****ing cheat, if your that concerned... then don't! simple. There are many techniques which don't break your arms, lock your elbows into the wall, preacher curl and do slow perfect reps...
-
11-23-2002, 12:06 PM #19Originally posted by xTorsyon
Putting your elbows in your abs CAN'T be good for your joints...
I will even go as far to say these are better than preacher curls. They will give you a wider range of motion. With preacher curls, once you have your elbows perpendicular with the ground, you just took all of the stress off of your bicep. And you do not get that with these. Maybe you don't understand exaclty what I am talking about, so if you don't, I will try to get a pic in. Just keep in mind I don't have a digital camera, so it may not be very soon.
-
11-23-2002, 12:50 PM #20
The range of motion is reduced in a similar fashion to how curling with a barbell has a lesser range of motion than with dumbells.
The bar itself is stopped at the legs and you can go no farther down while with a dumbell you can curl slightly further back.
With your elbows against your abs you are also reducing the range of motion in a similar fashion anything that takes the arms from being by your side and instead brings them to more of an angled approach as putting your elbows against your abs does will slightly reduce range of motion. With your arm against your ab you can have more of a bend in your forearm in relation to your upper arm this makes a curl easier than a curl from an absolute dead hang is. If you think this is not so try curling with perfect form without your arm jammed into your abs and see if you can do as much.
-
-
11-23-2002, 12:51 PM #21
-
11-23-2002, 12:55 PM #22
Aetolos as long as you use consistant form and a reasonable range of motion you can progress rather you have your arms against your abs or not on curls. This really is a minor point but you can lift slightly more weight the way you are doing it.
I would not say arms against your abs is bad for your joints.
I used to do them more this way.
-
11-23-2002, 01:28 PM #23
-
11-23-2002, 01:32 PM #24
-
-
11-23-2002, 03:12 PM #25
-
11-23-2002, 03:56 PM #26
-
11-24-2002, 03:18 PM #27Originally posted by firstmark
Aetolos I bet lots of people doing dumbell curls do it the way you do without even noticing. The body naturally wants to find the most efficient way of doing things.
And just to respond to your "The body naturally wants to find the most efficient way of doing things." reply, my body just didn't naturally fall into this position while I was curling one day. I doubt anyone else's would either.
-
11-24-2002, 05:28 PM #28
I said lots not all or most. And I am sure more than one person does curls your way without realizing it till they look in a mirror or think about it. I used to do them more your way when I went too heavy. And I have seen others do this too so it is done by people and not just one person or two in the world.
You also see the same type of phenomenon in those who carry heavy long ladders about. They kind of rest the ladder on their obliques rather than holding it farther from their body.
I bet if you asked a sample of people to hold a large dumbell or duffel bag in a curl position as long as they could that several people out of your sample would start to lean the weight against their abs to give them a more efficient angle for holding the weight and they would also lean back for leverage without even knowing because it is a more efficient way to hold the weight.
-
-
11-24-2002, 07:21 PM #29Originally posted by firstmark
I said lots not all or most. And I am sure more than one person does curls your way without realizing it till they look in a mirror or think about it. I used to do them more your way when I went too heavy. And I have seen others do this too so it is done by people and not just one person or two in the world.
You also see the same type of phenomenon in those who carry heavy long ladders about. They kind of rest the ladder on their obliques rather than holding it farther from their body.
I bet if you asked a sample of people to hold a large dumbell or duffel bag in a curl position as long as they could that several people out of your sample would start to lean the weight against their abs to give them a more efficient angle for holding the weight and they would also lean back for leverage without even knowing because it is a more efficient way to hold the weight.Last edited by Aetolos; 11-24-2002 at 07:24 PM.
-
11-24-2002, 07:41 PM #30
Bookmarks