justa quick question everyone says canned tune is very healty high in protein so wen i eat this is it ok to mix it wit like miricale whip and make a tuna sandwhich or should i just eat it right out of the can??
|
Thread: canned tuna??
-
03-18-2006, 09:42 AM #1
-
03-18-2006, 09:44 AM #2
-
03-18-2006, 09:45 AM #3
-
03-18-2006, 09:49 AM #4
-
-
03-18-2006, 09:51 AM #5
-
03-18-2006, 09:52 AM #6
-
03-18-2006, 09:53 AM #7
-
03-18-2006, 09:59 AM #8
-
-
03-18-2006, 10:03 AM #9
-
03-18-2006, 10:06 AM #10
only 3 cans??? i prob bout 4-5 and i usually put like light mayo relish pepper and lettuce on wheat bread so i figured that was pretty good. what about makin 2 sandwhiches out of one can is 4 pieces of bread bad??? also how is meat from deli like ham and roast beef are they good sources of anything?
-
03-18-2006, 10:10 AM #11Originally Posted by davewins
Dude, if you don't like tuna because you feel its harmful, then that's fine. But don't start promoting the ban of tuna. It's one of the leanest sources of protein out there and if it'll help me with my goals, i'm eating it.Last edited by \S/; 03-18-2006 at 10:12 AM.
-
03-18-2006, 10:19 AM #12Originally Posted by boyscouT
-
-
03-18-2006, 10:24 AM #13
-
03-18-2006, 10:32 AM #14
-
03-18-2006, 10:32 AM #15
-
03-18-2006, 10:50 AM #16
-
-
03-18-2006, 12:57 PM #17
-
03-18-2006, 03:03 PM #18Originally Posted by boyscouT
Tuna Industry Confirms FDA Findings on Safety of Canned Tuna
Outlines Inaccuracies and Omissions in Media Reports
Washington, DC; January 27, 2006 -- The U. S. Tuna Foundation today called the continuing series of reports in the Chicago Tribune irresponsible journalism designed to alarm the public about a healthy and popular food when all government studies in the U.S. and abroad confirm that canned tuna is a safe and nutritious food product.
Responding to the sixth article in an ongoing series by the Chicago Tribune, the U.S. Tuna Foundation (USTF) challenged how the newspaper interpreted the findings of new testing data from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about mercury levels in commercially sold fish. Although the testing data clearly show that the mercury levels in canned tuna products are well within the safe limits established by the FDA, the Tribune article attempts to extrapolate a different conclusion by selectively using only a small data sample.
According to FDA’s latest testing data for mercury levels in commercially sold fish and shellfish, the average amount of mercury in light canned tuna remains at 0.12 parts per million (ppm), which is eight times lower than the very conservative 1.00-ppm limit for commercial fish set by FDA. As a result, FDA has determined that canned light tuna is a low mercury fish that is safe for all Americans.
“It’s time to end the madness about mercury levels in canned tuna,” said Dave Burney, USTF’s Executive Director. “No one is at risk from the minute amounts of mercury in canned tuna. This is the conclusion of the FDA and the public health community.”
The U.S. Tuna Foundation also emphasized that no government study has ever found unsafe levels of mercury in anyone who ate canned tuna. This includes two large studies conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and a recent study by the National Institute for Minamata Disease in Japan, where people eat an average of 145.7 pounds of fish a year, compared to only 16.6 pounds for the average American. According to this study, 72 percent of all Japanese women have significantly higher concentrations of mercury in their systems than U.S. women but without any evidence of health effects for themselves or their children.
As additional evidence, USTF pointed to the findings of a major study by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, which confirms that the health benefits of consuming seafood far outweigh any risk due to trace amounts of mercury in fish. Published in the November 2005 issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, the new study concludes that for women of childbearing age, cognitive benefits can be achieved with virtually no negative impact on the developing child if women of childbearing age eat two servings a week of fish that are low in mercury. The Harvard researchers further reveal that if Americans reduce their fish consumption out of confusion about mercury, there will be serious public health consequences, notably higher death rates from heart disease and stroke.
More information about canned tuna and its health benefits is available at the USTF Web site, www.tunafacts.com.
Established in 1976, the US Tuna Foundation (USTF) is the national organization representing the canned tuna processors and the fishermen who supply them and addresses issues ranging from fishing access arrangements to federal and state regulations and domestic marketing.
-
03-18-2006, 03:07 PM #19Originally Posted by davewins
I hate you and everyone who thinks like you.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...1&postcount=21
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...2&postcount=22
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...1&postcount=27
Q. Is anyone at risk from consuming too much mercury from canned tuna?
A. Absolutely not. Nobody eating canned tuna in the U.S. has ever consumed the amount of mercury that comes close to what scientists call the “no observed adverse effect level” -- or the level linked to adverse health effects. This is also true in countries like Japan, where consumers eat significantly more tuna and other kinds of ocean fish.
Q. I have heard reports that more than 600,000 babies could be at risk if their mothers eat fish when they were pregnant. Is this true?
A. Absolutely not. Activists who want to change environmental policy have cited this statistic as a way of scaring the public and especially pregnant women. But this estimate is not based on any science. Instead, the activists have distorted a government study designed for another purpose to come up with estimates that make good headlines but have no basis in fact.
Here is the real fact: every scientific study has found is that no one in the U.S. has anywhere near the amount of mercury in their system known to cause a health problem. This is supported by two large studies conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which found all of the women and children studied were significantly below any known adverse effect level (confirming no one is at risk).
http://www.tunafacts.com/mercury/qanda.cfmMy Goals:
For to make the heavy weights light and the baggy clothes tight.
-
03-19-2006, 05:29 AM #20
Morbid why don't you do yourself a favor and grow up. If you disagree with me then that's fine. You hate me yet you don't know me. Just another tough guy online that doesn't have the balls to go up to someone and say what they need to say to their face. You're just another one of those guys. This is the internet dude. The internet. It shocks me when I see how immature some people are. Opinions are just like a$$holes, everybody's got one. Because my opinion is different then yours doesn't mean you have to "hate" me. You obviously are a very young individual if you "hate" someone over the internet over a differing opinion.
Judging by your sig I would have to put you in the 14-16 year old range.
-
-
03-19-2006, 05:52 AM #21
From the magazine "Health Smart Today" Daphne Zuniga's personal battle with mercury poisoning.
HS: What exactly is Mercury poisoning and what are the dangers of it??
DZ: First of all, I found out that one out of six people have toxic levels of mercury in their bodies in this country. They focus on women by saying one out of six women of childbearing age are toxic with mercury. They say that because mercury severely affects unborn children, the fetus. It is the neutrotoxin....basically a heavy metal that comes from coal power plants and the pollution in these plants, and it's a byproduct of that. It comes from other things too. If you can believe it, there are nine chlorine plants in the country and those nine have pretty much the same amound of mercury as 1,300 coal power plants. It goes out into the air as a heavy metal. It doesn't disintegrate; it falls down and ends up in our water bodies, like in the ocean, lakes and rivers. Fish eat it. When it gets into the water the algae in the water turns it into another kind of mercury, which is called methol mercury, which becomes even more toxic. The fish eat it and it stays in the fish and then we end up eating the fish. The fish that are the most toxic, because of their size and their age (they live the longest) are swordfish and albacore tuna. Those are the two fish that are on everybody's warning list because they have a lot of mercury. I didn't eat red meat or chicken, so I was eating fish for the last 20 years as my main source of protein. I was eating fish - from canned tuna to the deli, whole foods right in the case - three to four times a week. Ironically, people who are bodybuilders or who are in my industry and have to stay thin, eat a lot of protein and low carbs, like a salad with tuna or sushi for example. This stuff is loaded with mercury. When I found out that the numbers were so high, I got myself tested from my doctor who gave me a heavy metal test. Unfortunateley, it isn't a common test. It's becoming more so because people are learning that so many more people are toxic. Those tests for blood, they don't test for heavy metals regularly. I found out I was double the safe level of mercury in my body. So basically, that's what it is. You get it from the food chain; you get it from fish. You also get it from fillings.
The article goes on but I don't feel like typing out the rest. This is an actress (melrose place and beautiful people) that suffered with mercury poisoning over many years of eating tuna and I assume other fish. I guess a lot of you are too young to realize the way the world works. Money makes the world go round and company's and websites will lie to keep the product on the line. They want as many customers as they can and if there were websites that insisted on mercury poisoning "rumors" then these tuna companies would lose a LOT of money. So instead of hating me for having my rightful opinion on the matter do a little more research and don't believe everything you read. This is from somebody who actually had mercury poisoning. It's obviously a slow process, but if you do eat too much tuna for a long time you will get mercury poisoning.
-
03-19-2006, 04:41 PM #22
The article goes on but I don't feel like typing out the rest. This is an actress (melrose place and beautiful people) that suffered with mercury poisoning over many years of eating tuna and I assume other fish. I guess a lot of you are too young to realize the way the world works. Money makes the world go round and company's and websites will lie to keep the product on the line. They want as many customers as they can and if there were websites that insisted on mercury poisoning "rumors" then these tuna companies would lose a LOT of money. So instead of hating me for having my rightful opinion on the matter do a little more research and don't believe everything you read. This is from somebody who actually had mercury poisoning. It's obviously a slow process, but if you do eat too much tuna for a long time you will get mercury poisoning.
I posted an article from the FDA and the Safety of canned tuna. Everybody is intitled to an opinion wether they think its rightful or not. You just told the person to do more reaserch but in the same sentence told them not to beleive everything they read, what gives? Don't get me wrong, IMO the Tuna/Mercurey is no different then the Eggs/Colesterol or the milk/PWO meal also proven unfounded.
-
03-19-2006, 05:33 PM #23
-
03-19-2006, 05:52 PM #24
-
-
03-19-2006, 07:17 PM #25
-
03-20-2006, 04:10 AM #26Originally Posted by 2bbig
-
03-20-2006, 06:07 AM #27
-
03-20-2006, 07:17 AM #28Originally Posted by gecko2424
-
-
03-20-2006, 07:47 AM #29Originally Posted by B_Master_Flash
I think the US needs some serious education reforms...then maybe there wouldn't be so many ignorant people trying to spread their ignorance like some highly infectious disease...Age 22
Current 155lb w/ a hurting back :-(
5'11"
-
03-20-2006, 08:38 AM #30Originally Posted by davewins
I still eat tuna on a regular daily basis usually between 2 - 3 cans a day.
If you are still super paranoid about this, sub canned Salmon. Little more expensive, but same nutritional goodness, and taste alot better (less fishy), oh and of course about a third of mercury contents of tuna.ALL REPS RETURNED!
5'7" 20yr Male
Currently - 156 - 10.5% BF
Goal - 160 - 8% BF
The more you sweat, the less you bleed.
Bookmarks