|
-
06-11-2008, 01:50 PM #1591
-
06-11-2008, 01:54 PM #1592
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 4,824
- Rep Power: 4690
He'll probably train with the ghost of Mr Jones
http://hit-training-nutrition.mypunb....php?id=350757
-
-
06-11-2008, 02:08 PM #1593
-
06-11-2008, 02:25 PM #1594
-
06-11-2008, 03:37 PM #1595
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Location: Sewell, New Jersey, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 893
- Rep Power: 1914
my progress has been very good since straying from the hit theories. as stated before-- mass isn't what i'm after, explosive power is.
last week (friday) i snapped the rear cog on my bike while practicing my last straights. this doesn't happen unless you are laying down some serious horses. only problem is that when parts let go like that, you get sent flying. glad i had my helmet on, wish i had my gloves on!!!LOL
has anyone tried signing up at gerry's site just for fun?
-
06-11-2008, 04:05 PM #1596
-
-
06-12-2008, 03:38 AM #1597
-
06-12-2008, 03:45 AM #1598
I have no interest in Gerald's "Believe-It-Or-Not" Hope you are reading this Gerry, and you know what I mean..jellybean..from the Philippine
Dave..glad to see your training is working. I am nearing the end of my training cycle, and already in new PR territory. I will share next week when finished up.
-
06-12-2008, 12:03 PM #1599
-
06-12-2008, 01:03 PM #1600
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 19,925
- Rep Power: 10376
To Gerry, from the ghost of Arthur Jones:
Before it is even capable of anything approaching a maximum effort, a muscle must be properly "warmed-up"
by the performance of several repetitions of a movement that is much lighter than its existing level of strength is
capable of handling. If not, the muscle will "fail" at a point far below its actual strength level ? but such effort,
even if carried to the point of muscular failure, will not provide much in the way of growth stimulation; because
it is not heavy enough to force the muscles to work inside their existing levels of strength reserve.
So the first repetition should be performed as rapidly as possible in perfect form; and if any doubt regarding
form exists, then the first repetition should be done at a pace somewhat slower than that which would be
possible under the circumstances
Using normally applied methods, it is literally impossible to accurately measure strength and the figures
produced by most currently practiced methods of testing strength have little or no significance. Strength is the
ability to produce power ? and while it is extremely difficult to measure strength directly, we can measure
power; and having done so, a reasonable estimate of strength can be made. "How much can he press?" is a
meaningless question ? unless we also consider "how far does he press?" and "how fast does he press?" Both of
which points ? distance and speed ? are generally ignored in strength tests.
During a recent workout, one of our test subjects was accurately tested while generating slightly over three
horsepower; disregarding the power required for raising a good part of his own bodyweight, he raised 275
pounds a distance of over two feet in less than one third of a second.
Most of our trainees never perform more than two sets of any one exercise ?and none of our trainees ever
perform more that three sets of an exercise ?and some of our trainees use only one set of each exercise.
People are individuals, and possible variations in the individual response to training are literally infinite ? so a
program that is exactly right for one man will seldom if ever be perfect for another man; but while the total
number of possible variations is certainly great, the "range of possible variations" is quite small ? and the limits
of that range are clearly known. Because of the great number of possible variations in response to training, it is
impossible to outline a program that will be "right" for everybody; but if the primary points to be covered in
later chapters are clearly understood, then almost any reasonably intelligent trainee will have the knowledge
required for outlining a program to suit his particular purposes.
The Arthur Jones Collection
http://arthurjonesexercise.com/index.html
1-3 sets, lifted as fast as possible, not always to failure, working each muscle group 2-3 times per week.
Gerry if your reading this, this is from the man that created HIT and taught Mentzer how to do it.
-
-
06-12-2008, 03:09 PM #1601
-
06-12-2008, 03:19 PM #1602
-
06-13-2008, 01:28 PM #1603
-
06-13-2008, 01:31 PM #1604
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 19,925
- Rep Power: 10376
"So the first repetition should be performed as rapidly as possible in perfect form; and if any doubt regarding
form exists, then the first repetition should be done at a pace somewhat slower than that which would be
possible under the circumstances" Arthur Jones
Should I listen to Arthur Jones or you. WOW tough choice.
-
-
06-13-2008, 01:43 PM #1605
-
06-13-2008, 01:45 PM #1606
-
06-13-2008, 05:31 PM #1607
-
06-13-2008, 08:43 PM #1608
Most. Pathetic. Physique. Ever.
Dude looks like he never lifted a weight in his life. I've seen Etiopians with better calf development.
If you're reading this Gerry, you lose, we win, your training methodology is the laughing stock of the community, and you're a perfect promoter for failed training methods...get it "failed?" Thought not.
-
-
06-13-2008, 09:59 PM #1609
-
06-14-2008, 01:25 AM #1610
-
06-14-2008, 02:58 AM #1611
-
06-14-2008, 02:58 AM #1612
In other news, Ger dog sent me this mighty tough PM, titled; "Watch over the next 12 months."
"Dick-weed,
You must be #$!@!Stupid.
I have stated clearly many times and most can figure it out...2 years of very decreased calories, and I gained a little muscle doing HIT.
Most LOSE muscle while cutting...Id bet your doing roids.. Not that you have much..
Just your training program sucks, like you...
So like I said watch......Look around......
LOL"
-
-
06-14-2008, 03:05 AM #1613
And if you're reading this Ger-***-Hit-Douche
I am natural.
I compete in events that are drug tested to prove that.
I am solid and 220, and you are making fun of my results, GTFO.
I hold more muscle in my left calf than you do in your whole body.
I got my results from proper training via volume.
HIT sucks.
You are proud of gaining, what 2 lbs of muscle on that piece of **** 40+ yr old, un-trained lifetime physique? ANY beginner could do that numskull. Fact is, you are a bully on like 3 internet forums, EVERYONE hates you, even HIT proponents, you have a piss poor attitude, a piss poor body, and a piss poor outlook on life....I know this may sound harsh, but I really hope natural selection hits you soon.... I hate you, fuking end yourself. Anyone that needs to make 10 different aliases to post on a bb forum is a fukn tool.
Oh, and HIT sucks.
P.S.-Mentzer was a fuking roided up, genetically gifted fool, that NEVER used HIT in his prime. Get a clue feggot.
-
06-14-2008, 04:02 AM #1614
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 4,824
- Rep Power: 4690
Justin
Dont even rise to it, we all know what he's like mate. We also ALL know that you are natural. ALL of us know this, all of us that matter.
If you used, you'd be a beast.
Chill mate and dont let those that want to live in messed up deluded little worlds bother youLast edited by britlifter; 06-14-2008 at 04:09 AM.
-
06-14-2008, 04:11 AM #1615
-
06-14-2008, 04:16 AM #1616
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 4,824
- Rep Power: 4690
Such is the limit of their mentality.
Layne Norton NATURAL Pro
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/photo/...ser=53&cat=500Last edited by britlifter; 06-14-2008 at 04:22 AM.
-
-
06-14-2008, 06:52 AM #1617
-
06-14-2008, 07:28 AM #1618
http://s278.photobucket.com/albums/k...JUNE012006.jpg
Dear Gerry will look like this after 12 months of training.
-
06-14-2008, 08:07 AM #1619
-
06-14-2008, 09:44 AM #1620
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 4,824
- Rep Power: 4690
The thing is. Gerald DID make a huge achievement in weight loss. He would probably had gotten FAR more credit for that IF he hadn't started is online presence with a HIT campaign that was dogmatic, unreasonable and insulting.
I think what happened is his weight loss achievement went to his head and he now fancies himself as a weight training authority.
There is absolutely no way anybody can claim a program as being best (even for them) without being on a muscle gain program for a few years while experimenting with different programs.
What Gerald has done is ASSUME that HIT is so great because he got lean on it in line with his dieting. He hasn't actually been on a "bulk" or experienced any REAL muscular gains. He has very little experience on what actually puts on mass.
Bookmarks