I had a DEXA scan today and my body fat is 16.5%
I posted last month about my Bod Pod test that said my body fat was 21.5% which I thought was too high. Since then I lost 4 lbs though but I don't think this accounts to the high % reported by the Bod Pod.
Ironically, according to the skinfold caliper I'm 11.7%
|
-
02-04-2008, 04:02 PM #1
I had a DEXA scan today to measure by body fat %
-
02-04-2008, 04:10 PM #2
-
02-04-2008, 04:16 PM #3
-
02-04-2008, 04:25 PM #4
-
-
02-04-2008, 04:26 PM #5
-
02-04-2008, 05:14 PM #6
-
02-04-2008, 05:35 PM #7
-
02-04-2008, 05:47 PM #8
-
-
02-04-2008, 10:41 PM #9
It was $100
The Bod Pod doesn't take into account my bone density. My body mass was reported exactly the same on the Bod Pod and DEXA so I guess the Bod Pod over estimated my body fat.
What surprised me is that, according to DEXA, my right arm is leaner than my left one but my right leg is fatter than the left one. Go figure. My trunk has the higherst body fat (17%), I guess it's in my belly and chest.
-
02-04-2008, 10:47 PM #10
I think it's important to know your body fat % professionally. My buddies (who don't work out) think I'm nuts because I really want to know my exact body fat %. They think I should just lose the weight blindly. I told them "would you run a marathon without knowing how much distance you got left to reach the end?" That's the same thing with losing weight... the end point for me is reaching 10% body fat. The good news is that, according to DEXA, I have much less fat pounds to lose than what the Bod Pod said. After I reach 10% I'll concentrate on building lean muscle slowly but surely.
-
03-06-2008, 12:02 PM #11
Just got a DEXA scan done here for a cocoa/protein study I am taking part in at Penn State. Since I am in the study it is free which is awesome. They show you a picture of your bones, muscle, and fat, its pretty neat. It gives you the result of both arms, trunk, both legs, and head. My total body fat was 18.1%, which I can thank to my legs being the fattest part of my body. My accu measure skinfold caliper I use gave me a 14% reading consistently.
-
03-06-2008, 12:12 PM #12
-
-
03-06-2008, 01:48 PM #13
-
03-06-2008, 01:50 PM #14
-
03-06-2008, 02:31 PM #15
-
03-06-2008, 08:41 PM #16
-
-
03-10-2008, 01:30 AM #17
-
03-31-2009, 06:17 AM #18
I'm writing to follow up on last year's post. I had another DEXA scan today. Since the last test I lost 11 lbs but according to the DEXA scan my body fat has only decreased by 0.7%. It's now 15.8%.
Apparently I lost about 6 lbs of lean mass. I'm really disappointed with the results because I thought my body fat is now about 12%. I lost 22 lbs overall since I started dieting/cardio more than a year ago.
Most of the remaining fat is in my trunk. I kind of knew that because I still have fat in my chest and a little love handles.
Below is a comparison of my result. I don't know how accurate it is because the scan was done on a different machine this time because I recently moved to another area. Anyway, please let me know what you guys think:
Last edited by Jeremy2007; 03-31-2009 at 06:22 AM.
-
04-01-2009, 11:08 AM #19
-
04-01-2009, 11:10 AM #20
-
-
04-01-2009, 11:30 AM #21
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 203
- Rep Power: 226
Lots of Universities have them in the exercise science lab. You can probably contact the exercise science dept. at any university to find out about studies that they are doing. You'll get the DEXA scan for free for participating. You might also get some free supplements or energy drinks, depending on what they are studying.
Everyone has a six pack. Most people just keep theirs covered.
-
04-02-2009, 12:08 PM #22
-
04-02-2009, 12:42 PM #23
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 10,607
- Rep Power: 4500
I think your buddies have the right idea. If you're fat and think you need to lose fat then lose fat. The exact percentage of fat is irrelevant if you don't like the way you look and want to decrease body fat. If you want to change something then change it. Pretty cool though that you had an accurate test done though. I myself wouldn't pay that money to get it done, I'm fat so I'll just keep losing fat until I think I'm lean enough.
"Everyone thinks they're on their way to single digit body fat as soon as they see a blurry four-pack in the right lighting.Your final body weight at 5-6% will be a lot less than what you think.Talk to me again when you get in contest shape." I'd be willing to say that 95% of people on this forum accomplish nothing in years, don't be one of those people. It's sad,they seem to have the knowledge many don't but can't utilize it.
-
04-02-2009, 12:48 PM #24
-
-
04-02-2009, 01:04 PM #25
-
04-02-2009, 01:11 PM #26
-
04-02-2009, 01:35 PM #27
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 10,607
- Rep Power: 4500
"Everyone thinks they're on their way to single digit body fat as soon as they see a blurry four-pack in the right lighting.Your final body weight at 5-6% will be a lot less than what you think.Talk to me again when you get in contest shape." I'd be willing to say that 95% of people on this forum accomplish nothing in years, don't be one of those people. It's sad,they seem to have the knowledge many don't but can't utilize it.
-
04-06-2009, 04:41 AM #28
Hey guys,
Just managed to find this thread by accident.
I had a DEXA scan just a couple of days ago, $60 AUD so about $40 USD.
My reading was 14.8% body fat, which was higher than I thought it would be, as my previous result was 17.5% and I thought I dropped quite a bit of fat.
Anyway, here are some pics to let you know what 15% body fat really looks like (15% are the after pics on the right).
Some people really underestimate their fat levels.
Getting below 8% would be extremely difficult.
-
-
04-06-2009, 05:25 AM #29
-
04-06-2009, 06:59 AM #30
Bookmarks