I was doing some thinking, and saw some videos of verticals. So I was thinking sure we do ATG squats and regular squats to improve the necessary strength for a vertical jump. However how about if me do the same movement involved in the vertical and have you squat heavy on the same movement?
Quarter squats as we know can be done with A LOT more heavier weight than half/parallel or full/ATG squats, and that is the similar movement in a vertical.
So how about as a SUPPLEMENTARY exercise, we do heavy quarter squats (3-4 reps) and do it with a explosive come up. We have supplements in our diet which in this analogy is the regular squats/deads/cleans and quarter squats as supplements for our "diet" to develop one's vertical when lifting.
Thoughts?
|
-
01-29-2008, 07:53 AM #1
Quarter Squats to Improve Vertical?
-
01-29-2008, 08:25 AM #2
I'm not sure. I'm currently working my vertical, but it seems wrong to just improve one side of the equation and not the whole.
What I mean is what if I get into a situation in a game where I really come off a deep jump and all of a sudden I come up limping or i didn't get near the explosion I wanted due to the fact my ROM was extremely limited during my squats?
Thats my reasoning behind it.
-
01-29-2008, 08:28 AM #3
-
01-29-2008, 08:34 AM #4
Maybe it's a case of diminishing returns and lack of specificity of motion? What I mean is that your proposal sounds like a golfer using a weighted club, or a baseball player throwing a shotput instead of a baseball, or some such thing. Perhaps to a small degree such training might be useful, but when pushed too far, the resulting motion is no longer mechanically similar enough to the original to be directly beneficial. Different muscles come into play, the speed of execution is reduced drastically, etc. So maybe quarter squats could help, but only up to the weight where they could still be done explosively (which may actually be what you're suggesting). Unfortunately egos, etc, have a tendency to get in the way and cause people to piles on the plates since they *can*.
Some Olympic lifters do "jerk drives", which is basically the dip and drive of a jerk, trying to get the bar off the shoulders, but not jump under and receive it. The problem is that it's VERY tough to receive the weight again once it's left the shoulders, since it's an overloaded exercise and thus quite heavy. I wonder if explosive quarter squats would be similar, in that the weight is likely to leave the shoulders and come crashing back down...
-
-
01-29-2008, 08:36 AM #5
-
01-29-2008, 08:41 AM #6
-
01-29-2008, 08:42 AM #7
-
01-29-2008, 08:42 AM #8
I know Joe DeFranco does use "50 rep rhythm quarter squats"
http://www.defrancostraining.com/art...rty-tricks.htm
Scroll down to dirty trick #4
I know Kelly Baggett also says it could be used as a supplementary exercise ONCE YOU HAVE REACHED APPROPRIATE STRENGTH LEVELS.
But the way Defranco describes it, it seems more to peak for a Vertical Jump TEST. That's the key here, he uses it to improve his athletes' score on a test.
Does it actually transfer to the playing field? Maybe yes, maybe no. With that said, training economy is a key point here. If the main exercises, do get the job done, then there is no need to waste time with quarter squats.
However if it does transfer to the playing field, then definitely use it.
Makes sense?Loneliness knows me by name
-
-
01-29-2008, 11:34 AM #9
-
01-29-2008, 11:44 AM #10
-
01-29-2008, 11:51 AM #11
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 136
- Rep Power: 243
Farzamk, if you do actually go through with this study I would love to see your findings. I like the idea and think it has some validity. The motion of a countermovement jump (a True VJ), where the hands are on the hips or on a bar (like you are doing a squat) is almost identical to a quarter squat. I would think they would have a place in a program as a great supplemental exercise as one got closer to the end of a mesocycle. Is that what you were thinking also?
ChrisChris Gooden, M.A., CSCS, USAW, NSCA-CPT
-
01-29-2008, 11:56 AM #12
-
-
01-29-2008, 12:02 PM #13
-
01-29-2008, 12:03 PM #14
-
01-29-2008, 12:05 PM #15
-
01-29-2008, 12:11 PM #16
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 4,171
- Rep Power: 525
No too much. I do know that a high box squat will put most of the work on your quad muscles. I know that with a parallel and below box, different stances will target certain areas more. I think that if you are trying to use this for a carryover to the vert, you would need a shoulder width or narrower stance.
CPT-ISSA
Trainedbykevin.com
-
-
01-29-2008, 12:58 PM #17
-
01-29-2008, 02:11 PM #18
Straight out of the VJB:
Along these same lines many people will ask, ?Since during a vertical jump one only descends into a ? squat position, then why should they do loaded squats with a full range of motion going past parallel?? Again, realize the purpose of strength training is to improve the general strength of the muscles involved. The fact is that a full deep squat is better at strengthening all the muscles involved in the vertical jump, despite the fact that one is capable of using much more weight in a ? squat. A full squat fully activates the muscles of the quadriceps and also strongly engages the hamstrings, glutes, and even
calves. Not only does this build strength, but it also keeps the lower body in
developmental balance and helps prevent knee injuries and muscle strains. A ? squat doesn?t strengthen the muscles of the posterior chain nearly as well and also puts a lot of stress on the tendons of the knee. However, there is a time when the ? squat can be effective. That is after a base of strength has been developed. The ? squat can then be used for short periods for further enhance strength development. If I could throw out one piece of advice to every young athlete in the world it would be,
?Do squats and do them full and deep!?
-
01-29-2008, 02:20 PM #19
-
01-29-2008, 02:21 PM #20
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Kansas, United States
- Posts: 2,862
- Rep Power: 2057
I believe the NSCA published the results of a study a couple of years back that showed minimal improvement from partial-rep squats as opposed to full squats. If one were to incorporate them I could see them being useful a more a power-building tool versus a strength-building tool in a similar way to how one can use "power-shrugs" in the place of power-cleans to achieve the same result with less of a learning-curve.
Last edited by Jhawk Fitness; 01-29-2008 at 02:23 PM.
Director of Sports Performance
NSCA-RSCC & CSCS , NASM-CES
Nike SPARQ Trainer
Vist www.TopSpeedTraining.com, also find us on social media:
http://www.facebook.com/TopSpeedSportsPerformance
Twitter & Instagram = @TopSpeedLLC
-
-
01-29-2008, 02:21 PM #21
-
01-29-2008, 02:23 PM #22
-
01-29-2008, 02:25 PM #23
-
01-29-2008, 02:25 PM #24
-
-
01-29-2008, 02:28 PM #25
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Kansas, United States
- Posts: 2,862
- Rep Power: 2057
-
01-29-2008, 02:29 PM #26
-
01-29-2008, 02:29 PM #27
-
01-29-2008, 02:31 PM #28
-
-
01-29-2008, 02:36 PM #29
-
01-29-2008, 02:41 PM #30
Bookmarks