Everyone picks something bad about all the bodybuilders, but what can you say about flex wheeler?
The guy is just outstanding IMO, people will cry synthol but please they all use it (well most) and the point of bodybuilding is to LOOK GOOD, does valentino look good of course not, but flex looked AMAZING. No gut, tons of mass, perfect proportions.
What do you guys think? I know he had tough competition but damn I look at that guy and think "how was he not mr o?"
I'm not saying I'm right but what am I missing? Flex looks like the perfect ambassador for bodybuilding: huge, but still aesthetic.
|
-
12-27-2005, 02:03 PM #1
Ronnie has a gut, Jay has wide abs, Dexter is too small,etc.What was wrong with Flex?
-
12-27-2005, 02:09 PM #2
-
12-27-2005, 02:11 PM #3
-
12-27-2005, 02:51 PM #4
-
-
12-27-2005, 03:28 PM #5
Yeah. His physique started to look different at a certain point. Not sure when that specifically was, but it seemed like it was when he started with the synthol. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he have synthol injected in his shoulders? It seemed that way in some of his pictures. Other than that, I think he had one of the best if not the best physiques in bodybuilding. He should have at least won one Mr. O but he didn't which I think is just shady.
-
12-27-2005, 03:37 PM #6
-
12-27-2005, 03:44 PM #7
Flex's weakness later in his career was conditioning, especially in the hams and glutes. His first few years on the pro curcuit in the 220's were amazing as far as muscularity, condition, proportion, and symmetry were concerned, but as he added weight he couldn't consistently retain that shredded lower body.
-
12-27-2005, 04:09 PM #8
-
-
12-27-2005, 06:39 PM #9
I think the issue with Flex is that he was probably the right bodybuilder competing during at the wrong time in bodybuilding. Classic lines, symmetry and muscle vs. freakish overwhelming size.
If Darrem Charles can win a show nowadays, imagine how these "new rules" would benefit a guy like Flex during his peak."Liquify it, Blood Alliance....I ain't dying... I am Immortal"
-
12-27-2005, 08:34 PM #10
Flex's biggest flaw was Ronnie. You could look at Flex in absolute awe of his mass and detail. All of a sudden Big Brubba walks in and blocks out the sun. Ronnie at his best is still 40 pounds more muscular than Flex at his best. I still think Flex deserved at least ONE Olympia win. It's the politics and judges that blew it. Not Flex.
-
12-27-2005, 08:46 PM #11
the synthol use has to be mentioned, because it gave, particularly his rear delts and calves, an undesired look. good quad seperation, but viewed from the back, his glutes and hamstrings were lacking, and conditioning in these areas was a problem. this will become a factor when compared against ronnie, as these are one of rons very strong points. another area was back width. while he had an outstanding rear double bi, his rear lat spread was lacking when compared to other top peers, particularly ronnie. while the man had a sublime physique, i cant agree that he should have had at least one olympia win, because i cant name one year when i believe he actually deserved it. 99 was probably the closest, but IMHO ronnie was still clearly better that year. before that, he was never better than dorian.
-
12-27-2005, 08:51 PM #12
-
-
12-27-2005, 08:52 PM #13
....
This is why Flex never won the O
1996 Olympia-After saying he was gonna kickass at the olympia he shows up looking smooth and takes 5th place
1997-Bows out of the contest due to attack by Ninjas
2001-Retires due to religious beliefs
2003-Apparently his "beliefs" weren't that strong. He makes a comeback as a "natural" competitor and fails to make the top 5. Later admits he juiced for the contest.
Here's what Dorian has to say
"A very complex person, though we have always gotten along quite well. He was the one bodybuilder who could have given me problems. But Flex never had the drive, that do or die attitude and love for the training that's required to win the Mr. Olympia."
I'll agree with that. He always came across as a bit flakey. Anybody who'll claim they were attacked by ninjas so they can get out of a show probably doesn't have the drrive to win the big one.Last edited by solidsamurai; 12-27-2005 at 08:55 PM.
-
12-27-2005, 09:53 PM #14
-
12-27-2005, 10:15 PM #15
I'll just state again what I continue to say...
HE CHEATED.
Simply put.
On an even playing field with everyone else doing steroids... he went one step farther and used Synthol and had calf implants.
The judges knew this and I doubt they ever considered giving the top honor to a poor rpresentative of the sport. there was no way in hell he was de-throning Dorian, and not a snowballs chance in hell he was going to take out Ronnie, with all the "lil - extras".
He never deserved to win the Olympia as the "best in the world" because he simply wasn't the best.
Genetics can get you everywhere in this sport... cheating gets you nowhere.
It's a truly sad example when somebody has such and incredible physique... can't get it together when required, then cheats to try an make up for his shortcomings.
-
12-27-2005, 10:20 PM #16
-
-
12-28-2005, 12:28 AM #17
-
12-28-2005, 01:17 AM #18
-
12-28-2005, 01:20 AM #19
-
12-28-2005, 01:37 AM #20Originally Posted by SaNdMaN
-
-
12-28-2005, 01:58 AM #21
-
12-28-2005, 02:54 AM #22
-
12-28-2005, 05:03 AM #23Originally Posted by solidsamurai
One thing you can note about most of the olympia winners is there extreme love for training. Ronnie, Dorian, Arnold are three that really come to mind. they just loved to train
-
12-28-2005, 05:31 AM #24
-
-
12-28-2005, 05:32 AM #25Originally Posted by One Man Army
-
12-28-2005, 05:55 AM #26
-
12-28-2005, 06:35 AM #27
-
12-28-2005, 08:00 AM #28
-
-
12-28-2005, 08:26 AM #29Originally Posted by Hulk7280
as for flex having a better back, then, yes, he was very comparible in the rear double bis, but in the rear lat spread and in both general width and thickness, he was nowhere near ronnie.
-
12-28-2005, 09:19 AM #30
Flex is the man. There are those of us who think he is the best ever, and those who could care less about his placing at the Os and such. Then there are u guys who think he lacked conditioning (what are u smoking)? But i think the truth is that he just lacked overall size. If u saw both of them walking aroudn in public, u would notice ronnie 1st cause he is just damn massive, but in my opinion does not have the best physique.
Bookmarks