Barbell Bent-over Row vs. Single-arm Dumbell Row on a Bench
Is there a difference between the two in muscle development?
Second, I noticed two differences when people perform bent over row exercises. Some do rows in a more upright position (about 45 degrees) and others do it so they are slightly above paralel to the floor (just enough to to maintain a back arch). What is the difference between these two positions?
|
-
06-11-2005, 06:20 PM #1
Barbell Bent-over Row vs. Single-arm Dumbell Row on a Bench
-
06-11-2005, 06:32 PM #2
-
06-11-2005, 06:46 PM #3Originally Posted by NewBeginning86
I've been doing "incline dumbbell rows" lately and they're a mix of the two. You lean on an incline bench set around 30-45 deg. and row with the dumbbells however you like, palms up, palms down, or hammer position. Not a bad exercise for something different or if you're running short on time and still want to isolate each side.
-
06-11-2005, 07:24 PM #4
-
-
06-11-2005, 07:26 PM #5
-
06-11-2005, 07:55 PM #6
-
06-11-2005, 07:57 PM #7
-
06-11-2005, 09:30 PM #8
Don't bent over rows also strenghthen low-back muscles? With one handed rows, you are supporting your self with your free hand on a bench, whereas with bent-over rows only your low back is supporting yourself.
From what I know, bent-over rows help with core strenght, whereas one-handed simply isolates lats.
Am I right, or am I completely off base here?
-
-
06-11-2005, 09:42 PM #9
-
06-12-2005, 06:59 AM #10Originally Posted by Nibblesworth
And some people with lower back problems who are mainly interested in working their upper back would be better off doing them with some kind of support (seated rows, T-bar machine, etc.)
But assuming everything is fine, there's no question it should be one of the main back exercises in a routine. It's my favorite back exercise along with close-grip chins.
-
06-12-2005, 07:06 AM #11
-
06-12-2005, 08:26 AM #12
Bookmarks