which one is better
|
|
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
07-09-2002, 10:28 AM #1biuriful
- Join Date: Apr 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 3,469
- Rep Power: 4732
creatine effervesant vrs. monohydrate
-
07-09-2002, 10:35 AM #2doctorben@cyber-rights.ne
- Join Date: May 2002
- Posts: 2,615
- Rep Power: 1634
monohydrate
[email]doctorben@cyber-rights.net[/email]
-
07-09-2002, 10:43 AM #3Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2002
- Posts: 1,372
- Rep Power: 598
Originally posted by BigBenn
monohydrate"it would be wicked to be an animal, you would'nt even have to worry about making plans."
-kevin commerford
-
07-09-2002, 10:48 AM #4Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2002
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
- Posts: 5,491
- Rep Power: 0
no question.Originally posted by BigBenn
monohydrate
-
-
07-09-2002, 11:12 AM #5Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2002
- Location: Bumfu(k, KY
- Posts: 1,600
- Rep Power: 8756
yepOriginally posted by Luke530
no question.Always in on join date threads crew
Pусский Бра Kpy crew
-
07-09-2002, 12:18 PM #6Registered User
- Join Date: May 2002
- Location: Leningrad
- Posts: 4,414
- Rep Power: 1857
no doubt
straight upKill me. You must. For I will not stop.
-
07-09-2002, 12:19 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2001
- Posts: 444
- Rep Power: 278
Same thing if you ask me, just one's more expensive for those whose stomach is irritated by monohydrate. I've tried both and had similar results.
-
07-09-2002, 12:24 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date: May 2002
- Location: Leningrad
- Posts: 4,414
- Rep Power: 1857
bullshi*, u aint afraid of no man
Kill me. You must. For I will not stop.
Bookmarks