I have a really credible anonymous source drop me a hint on Jungle Warfare. He told me his friend is in the FDA and that Jungle Warfare contained a test-like ingredient. It seemed a little hard to explain, but so were the results.
I've had several runs of Jungle Warfare throughout. Jumped on the hype soon as it came out, and the results were WOW. Energy all day, pumps, strength. Seeing as how I went past 100mg ATD, this was a little hard to explain.
My second run was the Evo Stack, which was also very good. But I actually was using a bottle of Jungle Warfare from my own supply. I kick started the Jungle Warfare a few days before the package came in, and just went through that bottle.
When I did my Hyperdrol and Jungle Warfare stack, with the new JW, the gains weren't as good as I expected. Then I did one more cycle of Jungle Warfare recently, and it was more then disappointing.
Around the time I was into my HD1/JW, Hyperdrol X2 was out, and **** stopped leasing StimulantX/Hyperdrol to Anabolic Xtreme, as well as changing the Jungle Warfare AI and later changing the Venom Hyperdrive formula. It was in the same time period that I was told about the "test-like compound" in Jungle Warfare.
Throughout this whole little trial, what this guy told me appears to be true or at least well reasoned. Patrick Arnold also tested the bottles and claimed to have some 'androgenic/anabolic' ingredient, the Dutch magazine spoke about Dianabol being in there, and nobody was able to successfully clone Hyperdrol X1 or Jungle Warfare effectively.
Now that the Jungle Warfare is 'debunked', the next focus should be Venom Hyperdrive 3.0. As we all remember, Stimulant X Cocolean edition was a extremely unsuccessful attempt at reverse-engineering Stimulant-X. CL Red Acid tried to come close by using the same coffee bean for caffeine in the same dose but did not succeed. And now.. the new Stimulant-X2, while giving a good boost, has no essence of Stimulant-X2.
This also makes me question Hyperdrol X2 and future batches of Jungle Warfare. Clearly, they are all cleaner, so can we really count on them to be effective? The hype of HDX2 and Mass FX was pretty strong, but Patrick Arnold, and many users said Mass FX does nothing. So there you go - all these products were only good because they were bad.
I don't know how credible any of these sources are, but from my personal experience and common sense, it seems to be true to me.
EDIT: Jw isnt a prosteroid, it possibly contains them off the label. Not so sure about the new ones though.
|
Thread: JUNGLE WARFARE & What Went Wrong
-
07-09-2007, 02:47 PM #1
JUNGLE WARFARE & What Went Wrong
Last edited by smh31; 07-10-2007 at 10:04 AM.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-
07-09-2007, 03:05 PM #2
-
07-09-2007, 03:09 PM #3
-
07-09-2007, 03:09 PM #4
-
-
07-09-2007, 03:11 PM #5
-
07-09-2007, 03:22 PM #6
I was right and you was wrong,the one to the left is the new one so this new drama thread ends here i belive..
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpo...&postcount=204
-
07-09-2007, 03:33 PM #7
-
07-09-2007, 03:34 PM #8
-
-
07-09-2007, 03:39 PM #9
-
07-09-2007, 03:40 PM #10
-
07-09-2007, 03:42 PM #11
[QUOTE=B P Spin;58461671]Interesting.
If HDX2 is not as "bad" as HD1, then why didn't you notice better results
while using it, despite the new batch of JW?[/QUOTE
well if it is PS, ur not suppose to run the same compund in a row. Results never will be the same as the first runLast edited by Eyayo; 07-09-2007 at 08:20 PM.
-
07-09-2007, 03:43 PM #12
-
-
07-09-2007, 03:47 PM #13
I've read this before from others.
I'm curious, though, if this is the case with all products similar to JW.
How many people have used a product (JW, Ebol, X-Factor, SD, etc.)
and got the same great results during the subsequent uses.
I know all those products are very different; just listing a few examples, that's all.
-
07-09-2007, 03:47 PM #14
-
07-09-2007, 07:07 PM #15
-
07-09-2007, 07:09 PM #16
-
-
07-09-2007, 07:12 PM #17
-
07-09-2007, 07:20 PM #18
-
07-09-2007, 07:21 PM #19
-
07-09-2007, 07:28 PM #20
-
-
07-09-2007, 07:34 PM #21
-
07-09-2007, 07:37 PM #22
-
07-09-2007, 07:40 PM #23
-
07-09-2007, 08:00 PM #24
-
-
07-09-2007, 09:07 PM #25
"MANY" users have said MassFX did nothing for them? MassFX was bad? I'll tell you what, compile us a list please and back up that statement. Because I'll compile a list of my own if you'd like me to of countless users of MassFX who got awesome results. Check out Timdull2's log to start
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...1032251&page=4
There is no one supplement that works for everyone. I'm sure there are some who didn't see the massive strength and size gains that the overwhelming majority of users have achieved. I've been a non-responder to certain products that have worked wonderfully for many others. But that doesn't mean a product doesn't work. Any time a company rep or even owner speaks negatively about another company's product, you have to take it with a grain of salt and consider that financial profit may be a motivating factor behind such statements. This includes PA.
-
07-09-2007, 09:20 PM #26
-
07-09-2007, 09:50 PM #27
-
07-09-2007, 09:58 PM #28
-
-
07-09-2007, 10:00 PM #29
-
07-09-2007, 10:05 PM #30
Bookmarks