well i'm considering (only considering) putting some dumbell flyes in my chest routine. Reasoning being that after i've done my flat bench i'm already spent as far as pressing movements go and haven't increased weight on my incline bench in ages.
So i was thinking doing:
Flat bench
Incline flyes
Decline bench
then the following week doing maybe
Incline bench
Flat flyes
Decline bench
Now i realise most people think flyes are a crap exercise, but could you give me your reasoning why you think they are crap.
Also anyone that likes them and has made gains using them, please also let me know.
Cheers.
|
-
04-29-2004, 01:36 AM #1
dumbell flyes - why are they bad/good?
sponsored by Bulk Powders Australia
use code NAPARM in the 'redeem' box at checkout for a discount off your order
-
04-29-2004, 02:02 AM #2
did you used to do dips and now do decline for a change of pace?
imo you should take out the decline and add dips and incline bench. also switch to db's for either flat or incline bench if at all possible.
flyes are a great exercise to stretch out the muscle fascia and promote more growth. you won't see much strength gain on any other exercises though.
-
04-29-2004, 02:10 AM #3
-
04-29-2004, 03:03 AM #4
- Join Date: Jan 2004
- Location: driving my camaro :)
- Age: 40
- Posts: 123
- Rep Power: 236
Originally posted by ratmonkey
did you used to do dips and now do decline for a change of pace?
imo you should take out the decline and add dips and incline bench. also switch to db's for either flat or incline bench if at all possible.
flyes are a great exercise to stretch out the muscle fascia and promote more growth. you won't see much strength gain on any other exercises though.Age: 23
Weight: 205lbs
height: 6'
current max benchpress of 297lbs
current max deadlift of 396lbs
current max squat of 341lbs
been seriously training since mid 2003.
-
-
04-29-2004, 03:37 AM #5
-
04-29-2004, 03:56 AM #6Originally posted by RippedUp
Yes, DB flyes are overrated. Too much risk of injury for little stimulation.
Stick with dips and DB pressing (flat/incline).
I do flies every 6-8 weeks or so at the end of chest routine for variety a finisher and to stretch, but with light wieght high reps 16-20.
But as Ripped said they provide little stimulation and certainly wouldn't incorporate them in a routine full time
-
04-29-2004, 04:23 AM #7
-
04-29-2004, 04:31 AM #8
-
-
04-29-2004, 08:52 AM #9
flyes are over-rated. they're basically stretching with weights imho. stick w/ heavy pressings and dippings.
Originally posted by dparm99
i've never done dips, i work out at home and don't have a dip station, i guess i could use two chairs but... Anyway back to the question at hand...
-
04-29-2004, 10:16 AM #10
-
04-29-2004, 11:36 AM #11
Re: dumbell flyes - why are they bad/good?
Originally posted by dparm99
well i'm considering (only considering) putting some dumbell flyes in my chest routine. Reasoning being that after i've done my flat bench i'm already spent as far as pressing movements go and haven't increased weight on my incline bench in ages.
.....insert clever sig here.....
-
04-29-2004, 12:57 PM #12
I like flyes. Its just me, I know.
But, they make my chest feel nice after all the pressing. I don't know if it helps to stretch the pec out after all heavy weights, or what...but it makes the muscle feel good.
I currently do 3 working sets each of bench, incline, dips and then finish with 3 sets of flyes.
I can't imagine a better 'finishing' exercise.
Eric.
-
-
04-29-2004, 01:57 PM #13
-
04-29-2004, 01:58 PM #14
-
04-29-2004, 02:23 PM #15
-
04-29-2004, 02:52 PM #16
-
-
04-29-2004, 03:01 PM #17
IMO flyes are usually not worth doing. They are ok to throw in every once and awhile but they should never replace the cores of benching (incline and flat) and dips.
"Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac." -Henry Kissinger
"Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster . . . for when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Friedrich Nietzsche
-
04-29-2004, 03:44 PM #18
-
04-29-2004, 03:52 PM #19
The upper chest originates on the clavicle. That has to be a consideration. Standing cable flys aren't good because you waste too much energy with posture stabilization. And when people take a couple of steps forward, you lose resistance at full extension. My fly's have a variation for upper pecs, and it has to do with the angle of pull.
My hard-drive crashed. I ordered a new one, and when I get it up and reload all my video clips, I can capture frames and post pictures of everything I talk about. Descriptions are hard, pictures are worth a thousand words.www.revised-training.com
Training got better
-
04-29-2004, 04:41 PM #20
But they don't isolate the chest at all. Still just as much anterior and medial delt involved. Probably about 35 to 40% chest. It does remove the tricep, though.
so your saying db flys arent a chest isolation move? Then why are they described in every book as an isolatino chest movement? O thats right cuz they are more of a shoulder exercise100% ANIMAL
-
-
04-29-2004, 04:48 PM #21Originally posted by RichM
so your saying db flys arent a chest isolation move? Then why are they described in every book as an isolatino chest movement? O thats right cuz they are more of a shoulder exercise
You can prove this yourself. Do one with one arm with a super-light weight and feel the anterior delt while you do it. Is it soft like warm jello or strong like bull? Bull, baby. Ditto on the medial head. They're both helping. A lot.
Is more pec is involved on the pec fly than in the bench press? Yeah. But nowhere near isolation.
-
04-29-2004, 04:53 PM #22
-
04-29-2004, 04:53 PM #23Originally posted by RichM
so your saying db flys arent a chest isolation move? Then why are they described in every book as an isolatino chest movement? O thats right cuz they are more of a shoulder exercise
Think of it this way, when you read "experts" about how to get huge: Everyone wants the big chest, right? It's cool lookin', and it sells books. So how many books do you sell if you print something that explains that there really is no (unless Atrainer's miracle movement is right) pec iso move, and that all chest work is really just hammering the delts, tris, etc. How many books do you sell? You'd be run out of town. Tarred and feathered.
Sure, presses and flies hit the pec. No brainer. But that's not te full story.
Why do you think all those 7-minute, 6-minute, 6-second ab commercials sell equipment and advocate crunches. 'Cause they can SELL that crap. How many videos do you sell if "6-second Abs" is the 6 seconds in the kitchen when you make the right food choices? We know abs is all nutrition, but nobody would buy that. Same with most fitness books.
Okay, rant over.
Murphy Out.
-
04-29-2004, 05:05 PM #24Originally posted by zackmurphy
Easy, tiger. I don't know what books we're talking about, but DB pec flies aren't a pec isolation move.
You can prove this yourself. Do one with one arm with a super-light weight and feel the anterior delt while you do it. Is it soft like warm jello or strong like bull? Bull, baby. Ditto on the medial head. They're both helping. A lot.
Is more pec is involved on the pec fly than in the bench press? Yeah. But nowhere near isolation."When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail."
-Abraham Maslow
"Ass busting work + consistency + time = results.
Burn that into your head and quit looking for quick fixes and secrets. Because they don't exist."
-Lyle McDonald
"You can't overwhelm idiots with knowledge, but, sadly, the knowledgable can be overwhelmed by idiots."
-Charlie Francis
-
-
04-29-2004, 06:18 PM #25
-
04-29-2004, 06:24 PM #26Originally posted by RichM
Then how do you explain in Arnolds encyclopedia they are written as a chest isolation move?"When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail."
-Abraham Maslow
"Ass busting work + consistency + time = results.
Burn that into your head and quit looking for quick fixes and secrets. Because they don't exist."
-Lyle McDonald
"You can't overwhelm idiots with knowledge, but, sadly, the knowledgable can be overwhelmed by idiots."
-Charlie Francis
-
04-29-2004, 06:28 PM #27
-
04-29-2004, 06:36 PM #28Originally posted by zackmurphy
Easy, tiger. I don't know what books we're talking about, but DB pec flies aren't a pec isolation move.
You can prove this yourself. Do one with one arm with a super-light weight and feel the anterior delt while you do it. Is it soft like warm jello or strong like bull? Bull, baby. Ditto on the medial head. They're both helping. A lot.
Is more pec is involved on the pec fly than in the bench press? Yeah. But nowhere near isolation.
ok, going to try to clear some things up. Yes books do say that dumbbell flys are an isolation movement. Also another thing, Yes dumbbell flys use a lot of deltoids, but the bench press does as well. Do a dip and you're shoulder will feel hard too, same with a bench press. Delts will be used a lot in any pressing movement and will not feel mushy unless your fat, but that's not the point. With the chest there really are no exercises that can be strictly worded isolation because no matter what you'll find yourself using shoulders or triceps. Flys are considered isolation by many though because you take out the use of your triceps and it targets your chest and yes your delts.
If you want to get all technical, you can't isolate anything. Even doing preacher curls, your triceps are the antagonist. Are you working your tricep to death? nope, but it's there stabilizing, therefore being worked, and therefore your biceps aren't being the ONLY 100% thing being worked. This discussion is almost too stupid to be discussed and there was no point in it being brought up whether it's isolation or not. He just wanted to know if they are ok in his routine. If he likes them, he likes them. if he doesn't, then he doesn't. I would take the BASIC movements though first. Flat, incline, and dips.6' 245
50 chest, 19 arms, 18 calves, 29 quads, 57 shoulders.
you gotta eat big to get big
-
-
04-29-2004, 06:51 PM #29Originally posted by ATrainer
Oh, you new this was comming. The reason DB flys aren't very good is that you lose all the resistance at the top, right where you should be peaked. Pretty much the same with all other presses.6' 245
50 chest, 19 arms, 18 calves, 29 quads, 57 shoulders.
you gotta eat big to get big
-
04-29-2004, 07:05 PM #30
Bookmarks