|
-
03-02-2024, 12:51 PM #1
-
03-02-2024, 12:55 PM #2
-
03-02-2024, 01:10 PM #3
yep.
you see the usual chit-libs regularly defending bills that don't even do what the dems claim they do.
brb "secure the border" bill. 10% of the bill actually goes towards the border the rest goes to other countries.
chit-libs defend it tooth and nail and pretend it was an actual bill needed to secure our border which is odd because they have made it clear they want our border wide open.
grok is a decent name for an AI though.
i wonder when it summarizes if it lists which earmark belongs to which politician.
-
03-02-2024, 10:44 PM #4
-
-
03-02-2024, 11:46 PM #5
-
03-03-2024, 12:02 AM #6
-
03-03-2024, 12:10 AM #7
It only does that when you tell it to make up something from scratch (ex; Write a 5 page paper on the Roman Empire), and even then, that was GPT 3.0. I think the premium 4.0 is much better.
If youre copy+pasting a bill (essentially giving it the source to pull from) it will only pull from that material.
-
03-03-2024, 12:16 AM #8
The concept targets a very specific audience. People into politics are usually older (boomers) and may not be tech savvy enough to know how to use grok. On the other hand, you have kids that may use grok everyday, but not give two chits about using it to summarize legislative bills that come from the House floor.
-
-
03-03-2024, 12:43 AM #9
-
03-03-2024, 01:13 AM #10
-
03-03-2024, 03:14 AM #11
-
03-03-2024, 03:24 AM #12
I dunno. AI is extremely useful for things like coding for obvious reasons, but I think it would still suck the big one when it comes to law. Because law is context-based reasoning. Have you read the debates between AI proponents and their detractors like John Searle, and Hubert Dreyfus etc, OP?
AI is notoriously bad at context-based reasoning. It's a serious and ongoing problem and not much in the way of a solution. Plus, AI in law has just invented citations to case law, made up names of parties, and fact patterns to support their made up assertions.
The key thing, is it doesn't understand.
I wouldn't count on it to do the job of case summary or statute analysis just yet, let alone functioning as a real lawyer.Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
-
-
03-03-2024, 03:38 AM #13
-
03-03-2024, 03:40 AM #14
-
03-03-2024, 04:25 AM #15
Lmao literally every bill has pork. Only people who never paid attention to politics before their orange cult leader conman came to town think these bills aren't normal.
So let me repeat.. the BIPARTISAN border bill IS a BORDER bill. Just because you don't like it (because daddy told you not to) doesn't mean it isn't.
-
03-03-2024, 07:52 AM #16
-
-
03-03-2024, 08:06 AM #17
The difference is the amount of pork going into it these days because people are numb and don’t care.
When thousand page spending bills get passed quicker then they could be humanly read, it’s a fukking problem and everyone should have questions.
The only time it becomes an issue is close to election season when a party tries for frame it as the other party is wasting money for votes. When they aren’t chasing votes they just all spend cash as freely as they want.
There needs to be a way to hold politicians responsible for the fiduciary duty they have to taxpayers.“Man’s image of the nature of man is not only a matter for objective inquiry; it is and has always been a prime instrument of social and political control. He who moulds that image does so with enormous consequences for the society in which he lives.”
-
03-03-2024, 08:23 AM #18
-
03-03-2024, 08:49 AM #19
-
03-03-2024, 09:04 AM #20
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 20,362
- Rep Power: 230432
In a thread about using AI for good to summarize long-winded, chitty bills and of course the leftists are hostile and screeching about Trump.
USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
-
-
03-03-2024, 06:51 PM #21
Bookmarks