Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?

[Bodhy]

I don't know why this paedo-panic has taken off, but it's a symptom of people refusing to think in anything other than black and white and using extreme language. A way to dismiss someone with an opposing opinion via extremist thinking: Everyone who criticizes women is sexist, anyone with a different opinion is gaslighting, anyone with opposite politics is racist, phobic, fascist etc. Unattractive man =paedo, any woman who disapproves= Karen.


I think the origins come from the Epstein case, where only Epstein himself was held accountable and this fosters feelings of futility and helplessness. The paedo-panic seems to be an exclusive right-wing phenomenon who lack a moral ground now they've descended into fascism. So they cling to paedophile boogeymen to feel morally superior because it's really all they have left.


Also a convenient way to hatemonger about same sex relationships and push LGBT hate, too. To further their political agenda they invent crazy narratives to scare people.

They did this in the 80s with the gay and AIDS panic and the Satanic panic of course. But doesn't the incessant squealing and labelling everyone a paedophile just leave you with Boy who cried wolf, where actual victims get ignored and people with padeophilic tendencies won't seek help before they actually offend?

Do the right-wing just accuse everyone of being paedophiles because it's an extremely difficult thing to nuance and an easy to demonize the outgroup whilst validating the in group?


In b4 "OP is a paedo".

[Fang2]

It's the trannies reading to children that's worrying.

[OPGenesis]

Back to your daily programming.


Negged.

[EireGunner]

get on your meds autistic sad boy srs

[Polaris]

It's funny how the same side that loves to mindlessly screech "racist!", "NAZI!", "Fascist!", etc. etc. suddenly turns around and clutches pearls - when the same behavior is done back to them (especially when many of them are indeed rabidly defending and/or deflect from some extremely sketchy chit).

[jtaylor2010]

I guess it would be similar if public schools had been putting satanic bibles in the library, if satanic priests had organized story time with children and demanded to be allowed around them, if organizations had insisted that the term “satanic” be replaced with “alternative god attracted person”, if there was a huge push to teach satanism to children and then laws that made it illegal for teachers or counselors to inform the parents that their kids were practicing satanism, if authorities had found a huge island in the ocean where the elite went to practice satanism and tons of witnesses saying they had been involved in and/or witnessed the activities, and if we knew tons of victims were being trafficked across the border to come into our country to practice satanism. And then when a president puts measures in place to prevent it from happening at the border, the next one comes in and immediately removes the measure to allow the practice to once again thrive.



So yeah, now that I think about it they’re pretty much exactly the same thing.

[Polaris]

I guess it would be similar if public schools had been putting satanic bibles in the library, if satanic priests had organized story time with children and demanded to be allowed around them, if organizations had insisted that the term “satanic” be replaced with “alternative god attracted person”, if there was a huge push to teach satanism to children and then laws that made it illegal for teachers or counselors to inform the parents that their kids were practicing satanism, if authorities had found a huge island in the ocean where the elite went to practice satanism and tons of witnesses saying they had been involved in and/or witnessed the activities, and if we knew tons of victims were being trafficked across the border to come into our country to practice satanism. And then when a president puts measures in place to prevent it from happening at the border, the next one comes in and immediately removes the measure to allow the practice to once again thrive.



So yeah, now that I think about it they’re pretty much exactly the same thing.

Solid point.

[messomi]

Solid point.

farcical

[Dave22reborn]

So, according to OP, homos spreading AIDS in the 80s wasn't a big deal?

[ezmac31]

I guess it would be similar if public schools had been putting satanic bibles in the library, if satanic priests had organized story time with children and demanded to be allowed around them, if organizations had insisted that the term “satanic” be replaced with “alternative god attracted person”, if there was a huge push to teach satanism to children and then laws that made it illegal for teachers or counselors to inform the parents that their kids were practicing satanism, if authorities had found a huge island in the ocean where the elite went to practice satanism and tons of witnesses saying they had been involved in and/or witnessed the activities, and if we knew tons of victims were being trafficked across the border to come into our country to practice satanism. And then when a president puts measures in place to prevent it from happening at the border, the next one comes in and immediately removes the measure to allow the practice to once again thrive.



So yeah, now that I think about it they’re pretty much exactly the same thing.

Rekt

[PhiloSquid]

imagine taking time out of your day to defend these people OP

[gwg77]

I guess it would be similar if public schools had been putting satanic bibles in the library, if satanic priests had organized story time with children and demanded to be allowed around them, if organizations had insisted that the term “satanic” be replaced with “alternative god attracted person”, if there was a huge push to teach satanism to children and then laws that made it illegal for teachers or counselors to inform the parents that their kids were practicing satanism, if authorities had found a huge island in the ocean where the elite went to practice satanism and tons of witnesses saying they had been involved in and/or witnessed the activities, and if we knew tons of victims were being trafficked across the border to come into our country to practice satanism. And then when a president puts measures in place to prevent it from happening at the border, the next one comes in and immediately removes the measure to allow the practice to once again thrive.



So yeah, now that I think about it they’re pretty much exactly the same thing.

Assburgers got REKT

[DDSF1]

Fraudhy is a sh*t smearing tranny fuker, of course he will defend child fukers.

[~Hades~]

Whoa big shock that op defends ped0s

[jtaylor2010]

Whoa big shock that op defends ped0s

The only people who defend or attempt to downplay the harm of children are those who either have playdoh tendencies themselves, are so evil that they are not interested themselves but want that type of activity to occur, or are so brainwashed they will just support it because it’s the narrative from “their side” so they’re willing to do the required mental gymnastics to make it ok in their worldview. Or some combination of those.


I wonder which categories Opie falls into?????

[Jayzuz]

Someone needs to check this fat kunt’s hard drive.

[Bodhy]

No surprise at all that a bunch of paranoid right-wingers roll up and deliberately twist my words to suggest I condone paedophilia.

Repulsive behavior.

[Bodhy]

The only people who defend or attempt to downplay the harm of children are those who either have playdoh tendencies themselves, are so evil that they are not interested themselves but want that type of activity to occur, or are so brainwashed they will just support it because it’s the narrative from “their side” so they’re willing to do the required mental gymnastics to make it ok in their worldview. Or some combination of those.


I wonder which categories Opie falls into?????

You can spin that little hamster wheel in your head all you want, but there is absolutely nothing I have said which condones or downplays paedophilia at all. What a disgusting mentality you have.

If anything, I said the opposite, in that your lame attempts to find an outlet for your hatred ends up as Boy who cried wolf, so you actually worsen the problem by drowning real victims amongst an ocean of boogeymen and prevent actual paedos from getting help before they offend.


The entire point of the OP is that all your manufactured panics aren't actually helping children. Besides, why aren't you flapping your hands at the Catholic Church?

[jtaylor2010]

Id also like to add, that this is a perfect example of how conservatives and others with a strong foundation are more willing to stand for what’s right, regardless of the current social climate. Imagine if the right tried to defend or downplay the scandals in the boyscouts. Or if they tried to defend/downplay the horrible things done within Catholic organizations. No, they didn’t do that…they shouted loudly about how evil and unacceptable it was and demanded change and for people to be held accountable. But when you’re a weak person who will just go along with whatever narrative is assigned to you by your team, you get people thinking that sexualizing minors is ok, or that giving them hormones/puberty blockers is ok. Or whatever else from the laundry list of ClownWorld absurdities is ok.

[Bushmaster]

You can spin that little hamster wheel in your head all you want, but there is absolutely nothing I have said which condones or downplays paedophilia at all. What a disgusting mentality you have.

If anything, I said the opposite, in that your lame attempts to find an outlet for your hatred ends up as Boy who cried wolf, so you actually worsen the problem by drowning real victims amongst an ocean of boogeymen and prevent actual paedos from getting help before they offend.


The entire point of the OP is that all your manufactured panics aren't actually helping children. Besides, why aren't you flapping your hands at the Catholic Church?

And there it is lol... Predictable AF and only a matter of time.

[Dave22reborn]

OP definitely has no problem with drag queen hr for kids, even though so many of these drag queens are turning out be Peeeeedos.

[jtaylor2010]

You can spin that little hamster wheel in your head all you want, but there is absolutely nothing I have said which condones or downplays paedophilia at all. What a disgusting mentality you have.

If anything, I said the opposite, in that your lame attempts to find an outlet for your hatred ends up as Boy who cried wolf, so you actually worsen the problem by drowning real victims amongst an ocean of boogeymen and prevent actual paedos from getting help before they offend.


The entire point of the OP is that all your manufactured panics aren't actually helping children. Besides, why aren't you flapping your hands at the Catholic Church?

You defend sexualization of children, whether it be through literature in libraries or drag queen story time….which yes, is aimed at sexualizing children(just lmfao at thinking those freaks just want to go read the Little Red Hen to some kids).

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/...eedAccess=true




Why do you defend the sexualization of children? Why do you chastise people who want to shine a light on how harmful it is? You think you’re attacking the right, but when you say that pointing out this problem is a uniquely right-wing thing, you are simply pointing out how terrible the left is now…because they will either defend it(screaming that it’s ok) ignore it(not show up in these threads and not speak out about it), deflect from it(hurr durr Catholic Church something something), or downplay it(it’s not a big deal conservatives are just being hyperbolic). You’ve done most if not all of those things.

[Polaris]

Groomer OP is seething.

It's absolutely farcical.

[Bodhy]

You defend sexualization of children, whether it be through literature in libraries or drag queen story time….which yes, is aimed at sexualizing children(just lmfao at thinking those freaks just want to go read the Little Red Hen to some kids).

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/...eedAccess=true




Why do you defend the sexualization of children? Why do you chastise people who want to shine a light on how harmful it is? You think you’re attacking the right, but when you say that pointing out this problem is a uniquely right-wing thing, you are simply pointing out how terrible the left is now…because they will either defend it(screaming that it’s ok) ignore it(not show up in these threads and not speak out about it), deflect from it(hurr durr Catholic Church something something), or downplay it(it’s not a big deal conservatives are just being hyperbolic). You’ve done most if not all of those things.

You can try and force a boogeyman out your ass like a sideways turd all you want, but I'm not advocating or defending paedophilia anywhere.

No one is denying it exists or that it is wrong. The problem is forging a link between paedophilia and the LGBT community so defending the latter becomes defending the former so you can demonize them without understanding their worldview.

[Bushmaster]

You can try and force a boogeyman out your ass like a sideways turd all you want, but I'm not advocating or defending paedophilia anywhere.

No one is denying it exists or that it is wrong. The problem is forging a link between paedophilia and the LGBT community so defending the latter becomes defending the former so you can demonize them without understanding their worldview.

When they go out of their way to be around children under the guise of "reading" to them, or "performing" for them, then why is connecting those fruits to ped0phelia a problem?

And negged on recharge you fuking ***ggot.

[EireGunner]

Stupid autistic retard

[Dave22reborn]

You can try and force a boogeyman out your ass like a sideways turd all you want, but I'm not advocating or defending paedophilia anywhere.

No one is denying it exists or that it is wrong. The problem is forging a link between paedophilia and the LGBT community so defending the latter becomes defending the former so you can demonize them without understanding their worldview.

It isn't straight people that are tyring to teach those in kindergarten about anal sex and blowjobs.

It isn't straight people that are dressing up little boys in dresses, and putting them on puberty blockers.

[FlipBrah]

You can try and force a boogeyman out your ass like a sideways turd all you want, but I'm not advocating or defending paedophilia anywhere.

No one is denying it exists or that it is wrong. The problem is forging a link between paedophilia and the LGBT community so defending the latter becomes defending the former so you can demonize them without understanding their worldview.

Lmao they’re the ones reinforcing the link when they say “death penalty for pdfiles targets the LGBT community”

[jtaylor2010]

You can try and force a boogeyman out your ass like a sideways turd all you want, but I'm not advocating or defending paedophilia anywhere.

No one is denying it exists or that it is wrong. The problem is forging a link between paedophilia and the LGBT community so defending the latter becomes defending the former so you can demonize them without understanding their worldview.

Lold and mindblown at how consistently hypocritical and cognitively dissonant you are. Just like with the lab leak theory, you are projecting all of your shortcomings onto the other side. You are creating a boogeyman of the entire right by exaggerating the criticisms and acting like we’re completely making this sh!t up. There is an obvious push to sexualize children, and an obvious push to normalize play dohs. Criticizing the direction so many in society are pushing doesn’t mean we’re hallucinating or going on witch hunts, it means we can plainly see what is happening on a societal level. And again, you’re the one turning the right into a boogeyman for simply pushing back against this. Hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance strikes again!

[BunkerBoy]

Its just standard Republican projection.
If you go look up numbers on liberal vs conservatives on being a paedo or any kind of sex crime, you find that its HEAVILY tilted towards right wingers.