How are people not disgusted with the E.Jean Carol bullchit against Trump?

[FelixTheCat1919]

Zero evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part except some sloot's word that he raped her in a department store changing room 30 years ago, the court finds Trump liable for sexual abuse.

Then he says he didn't do it and calls her a nutjob, bam, $83.5 million more for defemation! Now we're up to like 100 million or some chit. But apparently, her claiming Trump raped her 30 years back with 0 evidence was not defaming him.

On what planet does any of this make sense to anyone who isn't simply wanting to see Trump fall no matter what?

[JUSA]

On what planet does any of this make sense to anyone who isn't simply wanting to see Trump fall no matter what?

They don't care. Biden could hang Trump in the streets and they'd cheer, just as crazed emotional mobs have throughout history.

These people demand Trump is a rapist now, they believe it in their soul and if you ask them to explain the evidence, they will get angry at you. It's TDS, plain and simple. I'm not particularly fond of Trump, I think he made a lot of hot air promises and appointed far too many obvious neocon chits around him, praised men like Graham/Romney, and such, but I don't have TDS or obsess about him or toss morality out when it comes to Trump like they do.

[Polaris]

[BullittEV]

The left believes down to their core that what they are doing is justified. Tearing up the justice system is lesser of an evil to them then it is to take down Trump.

Theres no other explanation for the deranged behavior. (Maybe if Trump murdered their family or something, but clearly thats not the issue)

[Duckliver]

The left believes down to their core that what they are doing is justified. Tearing up the justice system is lesser of an evil to them then it is to take down Trump.

Theres no other explanation for the deranged behavior. (Maybe if Trump murdered their family or something, but clearly thats not the issue)

“25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for feelings and actions that in reality have a nonmoral origin. We use the term "oversocialized" to describe such people. [2]

26. Oversocialization can lead to low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society's expectations. If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society's expectations than are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think "unclean" thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many oversocialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the more serious cruelties that human being inflict on one another.

27. We argue that a very important and influential segment of the modern left is oversocialized and that their oversocialization is of great importance in determining the direction of modern leftism. Leftists of the oversocialized type tend to be intellectuals or members of the upper-middle class. Notice that university intellectuals [3] constitute the most highly socialized segment of our society and also the most leftwing segment.

28. The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today's leftists are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles.”


If only Ted could see the masses getting oversocialized via social media

[NitrogenWidget]

The left believes down to their core that what they are doing is justified. Tearing up the justice system is lesser of an evil to them then it is to take down Trump.

Theres no other explanation for the deranged behavior. (Maybe if Trump murdered their family or something, but clearly thats not the issue)

until, it happens to one of their heroes, themselves, or their children.
then that dumb bits is clearly full of chit looking for a payday.

[aal04]

The left believes down to their core that what they are doing is justified.

This.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions

[AlfBundy]

The left believes down to their core that what they are doing is justified. Tearing up the justice system is lesser of an evil to them then it is to take down Trump.

Theres no other explanation for the deranged behavior. (Maybe if Trump murdered their family or something, but clearly thats not the issue)

You are the left you fukkin queer

[FelixTheCat1919]

until, it happens to one of their heroes, themselves, or their children.
then that dumb bits is clearly full of chit looking for a payday.

Yep, then it's (D)ifferent, every time...

[TCmaxxing]

How is there not a reverse trial similar to Fani Willis for all these Trump court cases? Imagine all the lies, collusion and corruption discovered while Cohen, Stormy, Bragg, Letitia, and Jack Smith is interrogated on stand.

[turk75]

All you need to do is just look at any/all of the posts from the commie cuckolds here (z4, ministerofchildlust, phil9, nyfaqqot, sillie, opgenius, etc).. They're all bat sh*t insane.. Trump can go on live TV and say he loves breathing fresh air and 99% of these window lickers would probably suffocate themselves b/c orange man bad.

[Bushmaster]

"Some people think rape as sexy! Think of the fantasies!" She said...

"Rape is sexy!" ....said no actual rape VICTIM ever.

But then of course misc libs like Carl Spackler and Ass Rot desperately tried to play the semantics game and say "SHE didn't say rape is sexy - just.. you know, some people."

Plus...

- She didn't even know what year it supposedly happened.

- Her "attack" played out verbatim on an episode of Law & Order in 2012

E. Jean Carroll wasn't surprised 'Law & Order: SVU' aired Bergdorf Goodman rape scene 7 years before she made Trump allegations

E. Jean Carroll alleges Donald Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s.

"Law & Order: SVU" featured a rape scene at the same store in 2012.

In an email shown in court Monday, she dismissed the parallels as a coincidence.

- And she was a MASSIVE fan of The Apprentice. You know, the show that had her "attacker."



Bitch is nuts.

But absolutely none of that matters to libs. Batshiit or no, she said it, ergo it's true.

[z4v4]

ITT, Trumpers learn the difference between "a preponderance of evidence" in civil courts vs "beyond a reasonable doubt" in criminal courts.

[Bushmaster]

But then of course misc libs like Carl Spackler and Ass Rot desperately tried to play the semantics game and say "SHE didn't say rape is sexy - just.. you know, some people." :

ITT, Trumpers learn the difference between "a preponderance of evidence" in civil courts vs "beyond a reasonable doubt" in criminal courts.

See what I mean?

[Polaris]

"Some people think rape as sexy! Think of the fantasies!" She said...

"Rape is sexy!" ....said no actual rape VICTIM ever.

But then of course misc libs like Carl Spackler and Ass Rot desperately tried to play the semantics game and say "SHE didn't say rape is sexy - just.. you know, some people."

Plus...

- She didn't even know what year it supposedly happened.

- Her "attack" played out verbatim on an episode of Law & Order in 2012



- And she was a MASSIVE fan of The Apprentice. You know, the show that had her "attacker."



Bitch is nuts.

But absolutely none of that matters to libs. Batshiit or no, she said it, ergo it's true.

This doesn't really sound like a credible/legitimate "preponderance of evidence", son.

In fact...it kind of seems like made up Bull Shyt.

[Bushmaster]

This doesn't really sound like a credible/legitimate "preponderance of evidence", son.

In fact...it kind of seems like made up Bull Shyt.

"You're fascinating to talk to."

[z4v4]

See what I mean?

Listen, son... I'm explaining what the difference is between guilt in civil and criminal cases. If you didn't figure it out, the difference is significant. A preponderance of evidence simply means 51%.

Shiit... just listening to Trump saying he just rolls up on chicks and grabs them by the pussy and can't help himself... well, he just lost like 49% right there. She proved the other 2% by him picking out E Jean as his wife, Marla, in a photo after saying she's not his type (as if that's a good rape defense, lmao).

Here's the thing: all he had to do is say, "I have never met that woman and don't know what she's talking about" in response to her book, and that would have been the end of it - no case - just like the other 27 women that have accused Trump and haven't been able to sue.

[Bushmaster]

Listen, son... I'm explaining what the difference is between guilt in civil and criminal cases.

Hey, whoa!! Carl Spackler, what's this I hear about you raping some chick behind the greens maintenance shed in 1995?? WTF, son?

#BelieveWomen

#WhyWouldSheLie

[Maestro]

Zero evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part except some sloot's word that he raped her in a department store changing room 30 years ago, the court finds Trump liable for sexual abuse.

Then he says he didn't do it and calls her a nutjob, bam, $83.5 million more for defemation! Now we're up to like 100 million or some chit. But apparently, her claiming Trump raped her 30 years back with 0 evidence was not defaming him.

On what planet does any of this make sense to anyone who isn't simply wanting to see Trump fall no matter what?

Isn't it the job of his lawyers to make this case?

[HateLiberals]

Look up who else she's sued, it's literally her career.

[Polaris]

Look up who else she's sued, it's literally her career.

There's a preponderance of evidence suggesting that she is an egregious liar.

[SaltyDog920]

because dRumpphh

The entire country should be outraged at how fascist our government has become, but since the government is targeting their opponent, they're happy with it.

[Bushmaster]

Look up who else she's sued, it's literally her career.

"In a new book excerpt published in New York magazine, writer E. Jean Carroll has made sexual assault claims against President Trump and Leslie Moonves, the former chairman and CEO of CBS Corporation..."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-...ne-2019-06-21/

[z4v4]

There's a preponderance of evidence suggesting that she is an egregious liar.

That is true, too. Too bad Trump stiffs and doesn't listen to his lawyers and hasn't been able to hire a decent attorney in many years.

[BunkerBoy]

The left believes down to their core that what they are doing is justified. Tearing up the justice system is lesser of an evil to them then it is to take down Trump.

Theres no other explanation for the deranged behavior. (Maybe if Trump murdered their family or something, but clearly thats not the issue)

By "the left", do you mean a jury of Trumps peers?

[Bushmaster]

That is true, too. Too bad Trump stiffs and doesn't listen to his lawyers and hasn't been able to hire a decent attorney in many years.

Hope you've got some good lawyers Carl. Because all that elite crusher money you keep telling us about, son....

Hey, whoa!! Carl Spackler, what's this I hear about you raping some chick behind the greens maintenance shed in 1995?? WTF, son?

#BelieveWomen

#WhyWouldSheLie

[wickedman]

Enjoyed her interview on MSNBC after she won too lol, seemed really shook by the whole thing!

[z4v4]

because dRumpphh

The entire country should be outraged at how fascist our government has become, but since the government is targeting their opponent, they're happy with it.

It was a civil suit brought by a civilian against a civilian.

[z4v4]

Hope you've got some good lawyers Carl. Because all that elite crusher money you keep telling us about, son....

Why do you post retarded stuff, son? Oh yeah, it's because you're retarded.

If someone accused me of rape in 1995, what would the trial be over?

[BullittEV]

You are the left you fukkin queer

Lol, what?

Why do faqqots always just sperge some chit that makes no sense because they have a personal issue? I swear leftists all think the same like if they can rage out and be really loud that theyre argument is stronger.. full autist mindset.