How are people not disgusted with the E.Jean Carol bullchit against Trump?

[Abzu]

I didn't say it's proof. I said it leads to a preponderance of evidence. Yes, I think people who admit to committing specific sex crimes are more likely to have committed that specific sex crime.

You must hang out with some real degenerate pieces of shiit if you think it's normal to swap stories of committing sexual assault, son.



Well, hope in hand and shiit in the other and tell me which one fills up faster. The jury got to hear his admission of sex crimes on tape.

If I'm an attorney then I'm arguing that "grab em by the pussy" completes the burden of proof all on its own in the eyes of the average juror but If I'm a juror then Trump telling another man he "grabs women by the pussy and they let me do it" would not move me to believe he is guilty of raping Carrol lol.

Yes, I'm arguing that "grab 'em by the pussy" is both prejudicial and irrelevant to this case, if Trump mentioned a specific person/pussy and that person/pussy happened to be named Jean Carol then it would be relevant.

It is not direct evidence but it could make a juror presume guilt before hearing the case.



Trump didn't admit to any sex crimes, if he did, who did he specifically admit to assaulting?

Trump could say he rapes all the time on a wire tap then admit it to police but they can't arrest him without corroborating evidence.

The only way that "grab 'em by the pussy" should have been included in the trial would be if Trump or his lawyers mentioned it themselves.

[rampagefc77]

Trump did mention it himself. It was recorded lmao.

Imagine if any comment you ever made in private among friends, even as a joke, could be used later. Context be damned.

Hell, there are so many things I said years ago that would make me cringe today.

[z4v4]

Trump could say he rapes all the time on a wire tap then admit it to police but they can't arrest him without corroborating evidence.

You keep conflating criminal with civil. For criminal convictions, the standard is "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" and the standard in civil cases is a "preponderance of evidence." Admitting that you commit crimes that you're being accused of by a specific person in a civil suit is a piece of a preponderance of evidence.

But as for your statement, the police don't need corroborating evidence to make an arrest. They only need probable cause. You know, this is why bond exists because people are innocent until proven guilty. Corroborating evidence would be necessary for a conviction.

Don't you worry, son - your boy will have his day in court to prove his innocence.

Imagine if any comment you ever made in private among friends, even as a joke, could be used later. Context be damned.

Hell, there are so many things I said years ago that would make me cringe today.

What comments have you made in private to friends that are admissions of illegal activities committed against a person?

[Abzu]

For criminal convictions, the standard is "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" and the standard in civil cases is a "preponderance of evidence."

Correct.

You keep conflating criminal with civil.

I am not but you are lol.

Admitting that you commit crimes that you're being accused of by a specific person in a civil suit is a piece of a preponderance of evidence.

The point of the portion of my post that you quoted was to outline how statements are not facts and must be corroborated by other evidence before it can be believed thus "grab em by the pussy" does nothing to advance Jean Carrol's rape allegations whether you are talking proof beyond reasonable doubt or 51%.

That is irrelevant though as to allow the "grab em by the pussy" offense would be prejudicial.

When Trump said it he did not reference Carrol so it's not even direct evidence.

[Abzu]

Trump did mention it himself. It was recorded lmao.

While on the stand fool lol.

[z4v4]

Correct.



I am not but you are lol.

Right - you just don't have any examples where I do it, son.

The point of the portion of my post that you quoted was to outline how statements are not facts and must be corroborated by other evidence before it can be believed thus "grab em by the pussy" does nothing to advance Jean Carrol's rape allegations whether you are talking proof beyond reasonable doubt or 51%.

Who said his quote would make it to 51%? I said it's a "piece." A piece means other pieces must be introduced to make it to 51%. You know, like him saying that she's ugly and he never met her and then mistaking a picture of him and her together for his wife at the time, lmao.

[Abzu]

Who said his quote would make it to 51%? I said it's a "piece."

I don't know, did someone say you said that, who?

A piece means other pieces must be introduced to make it to 51%. You know, like him saying that she's ugly and he never met her and then mistaking a picture of him and her together for his wife at the time, lmao.

You did say Trump's statement completes 49% of the 51%.

[z4v4]

You did say Trump's statement completes 49% of the 51%.

I said for me.

[Abzu]

I said for me.

I understand that, for me it doesn't even complete 1% but for ~81,000,000 "americans" it completes 100%, that would make it prejudicial.

[z4v4]

I understand that, for me it doesn't even complete 1% but for ~81,000,000 "americans" it completes 100%, that would make it prejudicial.

In context of the trial, that is. Lol @ thinking that him being a politician makes a difference.

It is not prejudicial. Guy is accused of sexual assault. Guy admits in confidence that he sexually assaults women on the reg. But yeah, somehow the rakeback grinder knows judicial process better than federal judges do.

[BeachPro11]

In context of the trial, that is. Lol @ thinking that him being a politician makes a difference.

It is not prejudicial. Guy is accused of sexual assault. Guy admits in confidence that he sexually assaults women on the reg. But yeah, somehow the rakeback grinder knows judicial process better than federal judges do.

This is the issue I have with this argument. Do you know how many men, throughout human history, have said something similar to other men, when around other men? Men when talking to other men about women and sex can get very vulgar. A lot due to ego and a lot due to testosterone and a lot due to bravado.

That doesn't mean they would or do resort to violently raping a woman. Which is an escalation x 10000000. If that was the case then 95% of all males are rapists, and that simply is not the case. Trump is a man with a big ego. He says a lot of things, some publicly and in this case privately, that are just said because it is one male trying to act big around another male. He is even more egotistical and ego centric than most men.

In other words...he was just cawk swinging.

So how you take that as he absolutely raped that woman? Is just politics. If it was Biden who said that? You could have cared less.

[BeachPro11]

In context of the trial, that is. Lol @ thinking that him being a politician makes a difference.

It is not prejudicial. Guy is accused of sexual assault. Guy admits in confidence that he sexually assaults women on the reg. But yeah, somehow the rakeback grinder knows judicial process better than federal judges do.

Also, with your line of reasoning? You might as well use the Chewbaca Defense.

"It doesn't make sense".

[z4v4]

This is the issue I have with this argument. Do you know how many men, throughout human history, have said something similar to other men, when around other men?

No, I don't. How many? And by similar, we're talking about a criminal act against another person - sexual, in particular.

Men when talking to other men about women and sex can get very vulgar. A lot due to ego and a lot due to testosterone and a lot due to bravado.

Sure, but I've never heard any admit or discuss committing a sexual crime.

There is a big difference between:

"Dude, that chick's got some titTAYs... I'd like to stick my brat between those moo moos, ahahahaha."

and

"Dude, that chick's got some titTAYs... I'm going to stick my brat between those moo moos and if she doesn't like it, she's getting the fist, ahahahaha."

If you don't see a difference between those two, then it's because you hang around poverty criminals that do shiit like shoot angles when betting on sports.

That doesn't mean they would or do resort to violently raping a woman. Which is an escalation x 10000000. If that was the case then 95% of all males are rapists, and that simply is not the case. Trump is a man with a big ego. He says a lot of things, some publicly and in this case privately, that are just said because it is one male trying to act big around another male. He is even more egotistical and ego centric than most men.

In other words...he was just cawk swinging.

The hilarity is you're speaking to men and trying to tell them what men do. That's one of the dumber things I've seen you do.

Guys will be lewd, but I've never heard anyone say they commit sexual assault. Big difference between:

"Dude, I've had my hands on so many pussies like that. When you're rich and famous, the pussy comes flying at you from all directions."

and

"Dude, sometimes I can't control myself... I just kiss them and even grab them by the pussy. When you're rich and famous, they let you get away with it."

One is cawk swinging and the other is an admission of criminal sexual acts against others.

Again, if you don't see a difference between those two, then it's because you hang around poverty criminals and you are the company you keep.

So how you take that as he absolutely raped that woman? Is just politics. If it was Biden who said that? You could have cared less.

If it were Biden, I'd be saying the exact same thing. Stop being an idiot, if you can help it, son.

[TCmaxxing]

Why isn’t Tara Reade getting any money from Biden at least until he appeals?

[Bushmaster]

If it were Biden, I'd be saying the exact same thing. Stop being an idiot, if you can help it, son.

No you wouldn't, Carl.

Your cult leader is literally on video feeling up a little girl, and his very own daughter said he took showers with her.

And every single one of you liberal ***ggots fight like your worthless lives depend on it to defend him.

[Polaris]

No you wouldn't, Carl.

Your cult leader is literally on video feeling up a little girl, and his very own daughter said he took showers with her.

And every single one of you liberal ***ggots fight like your worthless lives depend on it to defend him.

[img]https://i.imgur.com/9hXgWBs.gif[/ig]

There's a preponderance of evidence to suggest that Biden is a filthy perv, yet...*crickets* OR libs RABIDLY rushing to his defense. (including one retard even calling that gif "porn" while also insisting nothing inappropriate is going on).

[Bushmaster]

There's a preponderance of evidence to suggest that Biden is a filthy perv, yet...*crickets* OR libs RABIDLY rushing to his defense. (including one retard even calling that gif "porn" while also insisting nothing inappropriate is going on).

And then there's the counter-accusations. "Only an actual ped0 would see a simple photo op as something sexual!"

But here we're supposed to believe Carl Spackler's bullshiit about how he'd call Biden out if he did the same thing. Give. Me. A. Fuking. Break.

[z4v4]

There's a preponderance of evidence to suggest that Biden is a filthy perv, yet...*crickets* OR libs RABIDLY rushing to his defense. (including one retard even calling that gif "porn" while insisting nothing inappropriate is going on).

Is this deflection, son?

I have already stated that Biden is a sexual assaulter just like Trump and Clinton are. Lot of old wealthy men from that era are. This particular case is about Trump.

[Bushmaster]

Is this deflection, son?

I have already stated that Biden is a sexual assaulter just like Trump and Clinton are. Lot of old wealthy men from that era are. This particular case is about Trump.

Whole bunch of discussions and posts about Biden, Carl.

With your fellow libs all on the strong defense play too. And particular reason why you won't take it to them, son?

Surely it wouldn't be a matter of partisanship and/or intestinal fortitude... would it, son?

[z4v4]

Whole bunch of discussions and posts about Biden, Carl.

With your fellow libs all on the strong defense play too. And particular reason why you won't take it to them, son?

Surely it wouldn't be a matter of partisanship and/or intestinal fortitude... would it, son?

I have spoken out about Biden on his accuser threads. But nice try, retard.

[Bushmaster]

I have spoken out about Biden on his accuser threads. But nice try, retard.

Bullshiit.

That is a LIE, and you know it too.

Post them up and prove me wrong, pussy.

[z4v4]

Bullshiit.

That is a LIE, and you know it too.

Post them up and prove me wrong, pussy.

If you think it's a lie, find the Tara Reade threads. If you're too lazy, have your top, jizz77, do it for you, son. As usual, fukkin retards only remember the posts that suit their political agenda.

[goody1]

I have spoken out about Biden on his accuser threads. But nice try, retard.

Bull****

[BeachPro11]

No, I don't. How many? And by similar, we're talking about a criminal act against another person - sexual, in particular.

I don't know how many. A very very large % that is for sure. I do know....for example and I am just using one example (male sports locker rooms) that having been in locker rooms literally 10s of 1000s of times....that males tend to make a lot of very ego centric and exaggerated statements about females that IRL are not even close to reality. And that excludes things said at the bar, the club, the baseball game, and everything in between.

Sure, but I've never heard any admit or discuss committing a sexual crime.

There is a big difference between:

"Dude, that chick's got some titTAYs... I'd like to stick my brat between those moo moos, ahahahaha."

and

"Dude, that chick's got some titTAYs... I'm going to stick my brat between those moo moos and if she doesn't like it, she's getting the fist, ahahahaha."

I find it hard to comprehend as to why you think Trump lies about almost everything, (and you say this all of the time), and yet this one time, where he is being secretly recorded while he is talking like a egocentric man to other men he is trying to impress, he is all of a sudden telling the truth.

And that truth makes him a rapist. Do you understand the difference between a man saying "I want to F her" or "she really wants it" to actually psychically raping a woman against her will? This is like a night and day thing. 2 completely different worlds.

You can't have it both ways. And yet you seem very willing to make that giant leap to convict a former POTUS of rape with zero real proof whatsoever.

[Bushmaster]

If you think it's a lie, find the Tara Reade threads. If you're too lazy, have your top, jizz77, do it for you, son. As usual, fukkin retards only remember the posts that suit their political agenda.

I already know it's bullshiit you gutless pussy. And I will continue to believe it's bullshiit until you prove otherwise. Because...

A. You would never criticize your cult leader - unless it's a part of your phony "Both sides equally" act.

And...

B. Even if you wanted to, you're terrified of making your fellow libs mad at you.

Balls not even once, son.

[Bushmaster]

If you think it's a lie, find the Tara Reade threads. If you're too lazy, have your top, jizz77, do it for you, son. As usual, fukkin retards only remember the posts that suit their political agenda.

Ok Carl, ask and ye shall receive, son.

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade

There's four of them going back four years. And Carl Spackler not even once.

Where you at, son?

[NitrogenWidget]

I already know it's bullshiit you gutless pussy. And I will continue to believe it's bullshiit until you prove otherwise. Because...

A. You would never criticize your cult leader - unless it's a part of your phony "Both sides equally" act.

And...

B. Even if you wanted to, you're terrified of making your fellow libs mad at you.

Balls not even once, son.

this.
bearing boy has no balls.
He and all the other libs know if any of them step even an inch out of line the whole pack will attack them.
that's how cults operate.

[Polaris]

Ok Carl, ask and ye shall receive, son.

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade

There's four of them going back four years. And Carl Spackler not even once.

Where you at, son?

Are you suggesting that he doesn't have a nickel's worth?

[Bushmaster]

Are you suggesting that he doesn't have a nickel's worth?

Ayup.

Carl would have to take out a $.05 loan from one of his elite crusher biz partners to cover this one.

[z4v4]

Bull****

I have always contended that Tara is telling the truth.

I don't know how many. A very very large % that is for sure. I do know....for example and I am just using one example (male sports locker rooms) that having been in locker rooms literally 10s of 1000s of times....that males tend to make a lot of very ego centric and exaggerated statements about females that IRL are not even close to reality. And that excludes things said at the bar, the club, the baseball game, and everything in between.

So you're saying that you've heard people talk about committing rape in locker rooms? I haven't ever heard that, son.

I find it hard to comprehend as to why you think Trump lies about almost everything, (and you say this all of the time), and yet this one time, where he is being secretly recorded while he is talking like a egocentric man to other men he is trying to impress, he is all of a sudden telling the truth.

And that truth makes him a rapist. Do you understand the difference between a man saying "I want to F her" or "she really wants it" to actually psychically raping a woman against her will? This is like a night and day thing. 2 completely different worlds.

You can't have it both ways. And yet you seem very willing to make that giant leap to convict a former POTUS of rape with zero real proof whatsoever.

This is just bizarre. So now you're admitting that what he said is a confession of a crime, but it's okay because he was lying about it because he thought sexual assault would look cool to his buds. Just lmao. Like I said, you hang around degenerate pieces of filth, son.

Ok Carl, ask and ye shall receive, son.

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...ght=Tara+Reade

There's four of them going back four years. And Carl Spackler not even once.

Where you at, son?

I'm not going through all those. If I didn't say anything there, then it was in one of the Trump threads where you guys were defending his numerous sexual assault accusations or the Kav thread, etc.

I have always contended that Tara was telling the truth because all those people are like that.