https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montr...ence-1.6975423
A Montreal neo-Nazi who was found guilty of wilfully promoting hatred against Jewish people has been sentenced 15 months in jail and three years of probation — one of the harshest sentences given for the crime in Canada, according to Quebec court Judge Manlio Del Negro.
Gabriel Sohier-Chaput, 36, authored hundreds of articles and some podcasts in the far-right publication The Daily Stormer under the pseudonym "Charles Zeiger." He was found guilty in the Court of Quebec on Jan. 23.- 15 months in prisonIn July, the Crown and defence had jointly recommended Sohier-Chaput be sentenced to three months in jail with two years of probation — a recommendation Quebec court Judge Manlio Del Negro said "trivialized" the severity of the crime.
- 3 years probation
- Re-education camp
For writing articles...
Thank god for the 1st Amendment
|
-
09-23-2023, 09:42 PM #1
Nazi sentenced to 15 months in Canadian prison for writing anti-semitic articles
Last edited by AlfBundy; 09-23-2023 at 09:50 PM.
Founding member of the Official johnnydeep1 Fan Club
Negs on sight: The Gyno Crew (Derplington, georgeenoob, MinisterOfLust)
-
09-23-2023, 09:51 PM #2
-
09-23-2023, 09:53 PM #3
-
09-23-2023, 09:56 PM #4
-
-
09-23-2023, 10:04 PM #5
-
09-23-2023, 10:07 PM #6
-
09-23-2023, 10:12 PM #7
-
09-23-2023, 10:19 PM #8
-
-
09-23-2023, 11:07 PM #9
-
09-24-2023, 12:10 AM #10
-
09-24-2023, 12:13 AM #11
-
09-24-2023, 12:18 AM #12
-
-
09-24-2023, 07:07 AM #13
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Ohio, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 7,781
- Rep Power: 176718
Meanwhile Canada itself has donated over 170+ Million to the actual nazis in Ukraine... Also strange how Christopher Pohlhaus a leader of the neo nazis morons here in the states fully supports Biden/demoKKKrats and their continued support in donating billions to the sh*t heads over in Ukraine.
....weird"Rise and rise again until lambs become lions"
USAF 2006 - Present
If you see me in the garage practicing my nunchucks with my crocs on just keep driving.. I'm in the zone and don't want you getting pregnant.
-
09-24-2023, 07:15 AM #14
-
09-24-2023, 07:19 AM #15
I don't think you would like it that much; it's catered to more high IQ individuals.
I'd like to make a different kind of argument here, because I really don't like to rely on scientific arguments to defend concepts that really should be common sense. Debating obscure scientific facts when talking about something as simple as fundamental as racial differences is counter productive, in the same sense that it would be silly to confront someone who claims humans can breathe water by quoting biology textbooks. If he thinks he can breathe underwater, then he just needs to try and see how that works out. In the same way, if you think there are no racial differences, try and live your life under that assumption and see how that turns out for you.
Of course, this is a non-issue, because everyone acts as if races existed, especially liberals. We all treat whites differently from blacks, treat arabs differently than Chinese. We have different expectations from those people, consciously or not, so you can't honestly claim that there's no racial differences. It's just common sense. The real argument that liberals use is that differences are based on learned behavior rather than inherent traits. Basically, all human babies are born equal, and they develop differently based on their environment. This is of course also a ridiculous concept.
We can all see that children inherit traits from their parents. Some people are born tall, some short, some are born frail, others big, some with big noses, others small, some with good eyesight, others poor, and so on. The same is true with animals, who all are different from each other, even in the same race (subspecies). And we know very well that the personalities (mental characteristics) of animals are also transmitted by blood, since we use this phenomenon to breed domesticated animals. If animals didn't inherit mental traits, we would never have transformed the fierce Auroch into the gentle cow, or the wild wolf into the loyal dog. And in a more extreme fashion, we couldn't have breed specific races of dogs that have extreme mental traits like the golden retriever know for his great patience and gentleness, or the pit bull known for his unpredictable aggressive temper.
It would be ridiculous to claim that all animals on earth function in one way (mental and physical traits transmitted by blood) and humans for some reason function in a different way (all humans equal, differences only explained by upbringing).
Then the next argument is "sure, there are human differences, and they are transmitted by blood, but you can't divide humanity by race, every human is unique". This is also silly. Obviously, if differences are inherited by blood, then group which are geographically separated will form distinct family groups and will tend to pass on different traits. This will lead to differentiation between different groups. This can actually happen quite quickly - we know by experience that we can breed new races of dogs and other animals in 50 years or so, and the recent and well known example of the Siberian foxes showed that a new domesticated species can be created in less than 100 years of selective breeding. Human groups have been separated for many thousands of years. So basic logic an common sense dictates that they would develop into different breeds.
So all that being said, claiming that races don't exist is basically like claiming that the inside of the earth is inhabited by a race of violent pig-men. Just saying "hey guys, 99% of our genes are the same, so races don't exist lol" is not a valid excuse for rejecting the notion of human races. It's a ridiculous notion, so the burden of proof is not on us to prove that races exist, it's on the marxists to prove that common sense, our life experience, all basic biology and history is wrong somehow.#11bangbang
Banging twinks since 2016
-
09-24-2023, 07:22 AM #16
He made the mistake of exposing the chosen ones:
The anglo model has been the jewish model since 1066 when the normans got jews to start rewriting anglosaxon law. Most modern commercial law, as well as english common law, is a product of jewish pressure on the english. What's called commercial law today is a distilled form of moral cancer applied to human interactions on a grand scale.
Before this corruption, most commerce simply couldn't be reduced to numbers (ie. money). For example, it would have been impossible to put a monetary value on a plot of land, because land was tied up into ancient traditions. The peasant family tending it couldn't simply be removed from there, as they had acquired the right to be there, even though they didn't "own" the land. The lord who was responsible for the land couldn't sell it, as it was tied to feudal obligations (ie. he had to fight under the banner of a king or duke when necessary). In other words, important things were tied into webs of duties, rights and obligations that transcended generations, and any change in those things were grave and complex events that involved agreements between several lords and permissions from kings, dukes, baron, etc.
In such systems, jews have limited ability to fleece either people or nobles (land, castles and other valuables couldn't be seized if someone defaults on a debt, making moneylending a very risky business). Thus jews have worked to convert all land and property duties into monetary duties, making commerce a business of paper and numbers, not of blood and honor. This vicious system enables a lot of the **** we see today. It has to go.#11bangbang
Banging twinks since 2016
-
-
09-24-2023, 07:39 AM #17
-
09-24-2023, 07:50 AM #18
-
09-24-2023, 07:52 AM #19
-
09-24-2023, 08:04 AM #20
-
-
09-24-2023, 08:06 AM #21
-
09-24-2023, 08:32 AM #22
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 50,652
- Rep Power: 601142
I'd like to make a different kind of argument here, because I really don't like to rely on scientific arguments to defend concepts that really should be common sense. Debating obscure scientific facts when talking about something as simple as fundamental as racial differences is counter productive, in the same sense that it would be silly to confront someone who claims humans can breathe water by quoting biology textbooks. If he thinks he can breathe underwater, then he just needs to try and see how that works out. In the same way, if you think there are no racial differences, try and live your life under that assumption and see how that turns out for you.
Of course, this is a non-issue, because everyone acts as if races existed, especially liberals. We all treat whites differently from blacks, treat arabs differently than Chinese. We have different expectations from those people, consciously or not, so you can't honestly claim that there's no racial differences. It's just common sense. The real argument that liberals use is that differences are based on learned behavior rather than inherent traits. Basically, all human babies are born equal, and they develop differently based on their environment. This is of course also a ridiculous concept.
We can all see that children inherit traits from their parents. Some people are born tall, some short, some are born frail, others big, some with big noses, others small, some with good eyesight, others poor, and so on. The same is true with animals, who all are different from each other, even in the same race (subspecies). And we know very well that the personalities (mental characteristics) of animals are also transmitted by blood, since we use this phenomenon to breed domesticated animals. If animals didn't inherit mental traits, we would never have transformed the fierce Auroch into the gentle cow, or the wild wolf into the loyal dog. And in a more extreme fashion, we couldn't have breed specific races of dogs that have extreme mental traits like the golden retriever know for his great patience and gentleness, or the pit bull known for his unpredictable aggressive temper.
It would be ridiculous to claim that all animals on earth function in one way (mental and physical traits transmitted by blood) and humans for some reason function in a different way (all humans equal, differences only explained by upbringing).
Then the next argument is "sure, there are human differences, and they are transmitted by blood, but you can't divide humanity by race, every human is unique". This is also silly. Obviously, if differences are inherited by blood, then group which are geographically separated will form distinct family groups and will tend to pass on different traits. This will lead to differentiation between different groups. This can actually happen quite quickly - we know by experience that we can breed new races of dogs and other animals in 50 years or so, and the recent and well known example of the Siberian foxes showed that a new domesticated species can be created in less than 100 years of selective breeding. Human groups have been separated for many thousands of years. So basic logic an common sense dictates that they would develop into different breeds.
So all that being said, claiming that races don't exist is basically like claiming that the inside of the earth is inhabited by a race of violent pig-men. Just saying "hey guys, 99% of our genes are the same, so races don't exist lol" is not a valid excuse for rejecting the notion of human races. It's a ridiculous notion, so the burden of proof is not on us to prove that races exist, it's on the marxists to prove that common sense, our life experience, all basic biology and history is wrong somehow.
Where he went wrong was bringing in animal breeds. Drawing comparisons between dogs, cows and humans is asinine as human complexity is far too advanced. I'm also not sure who he is arguing against saying that race doesn't exist. Few people make that argument, most simply say that race is not a instrument in which to discriminate. Pretty basic.Black with a Small Hat
Rabbi Penishead
Nigerian
Jogging and Mogging
-
09-24-2023, 08:34 AM #23
-
09-24-2023, 09:08 AM #24
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 14,642
- Rep Power: 130120
par for the course i guess.
In a just world it would be the jews who are getting thrown in jail for practicing a supremacist religion with their talmud, being jewish should be reportable to the FBI. It's an ethno-religion formed around hatred of Christians and non-Jews. Everything they say about White Supremacists is what they themselves are doing - there literally are no White supremacists with any power. However the media, all of our leaders, are either jewish or jewish approved, that is the one common anthem in the west.
Everyone needs to understand that these people that that have amassed all of this power and all happen to be jewish think that that you non-jews are cattle who's only purpose here is to be robbed, raped, lied to, and killed. Because this is their planet and their "god" will arrive when the world is ran from Israel with all other goyim nations brought to heel and bowing down to them as God's Chosen. However if you ever read the Bible Jesus says that these are not God's chosen, infact they are the synagogue of satan.
This is why the jews are so paranoid, or why you always see them say whites are the problem, because when Whites have power the jews get expelled, almost without exception throughout history. and rightfully so.
its a Jewish Mafia, they cry out in pain if you call them out on it.
-
-
09-24-2023, 09:14 AM #25
-
09-24-2023, 09:40 AM #26
Human complexity is far too advanced? dogs, cows, and humans all have unique DNA that make them what they are, just like every other living thing on this planet. Within those three species the unique DNA breakdown even further which allows each species to be grouped into subspecies. So no he didn't go wrong on any of it, but you did. Human complexity doesn't change the fact we still follow the same formula that governs existence for every living thing on earth.
If race exists like you say, it exists first as a genetic difference between humans that sections them off into unique groups. This means that those unique groups will look and act differently than each other which would 100% make it an instrument in which to discriminate. Discriminate means to be able to identify differences between things. Are you saying that there are no differences between human races?
If we can't discriminate against different subspecies of humans then why do we do it for every other living thing on the planet?#11bangbang
Banging twinks since 2016
-
09-24-2023, 09:58 AM #27
-
09-24-2023, 10:33 AM #28
-
-
09-24-2023, 12:28 PM #29
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 14,642
- Rep Power: 130120
-
09-24-2023, 02:19 PM #30
A Trudeau cultist Quebecker judge hands out 15 months in the slammer for mean words. After all, wrong think will lead to the Holocaust all over again. Trudeau's cult party of liberal lackeys slander everyone who opposes dear leader as Nazis all day err day.
But Trudeau and Zelenskyyy get the entire parliament to give a standing ovation to a Waffen-SS Nazi veteran
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/sta...57289360867740
Just from some quick google-fu, the only time the Criminal Code provision against "hate speech" resulted in anything other than a fine was also in Quebec, 6 months in prison. All other cases I found were fines.
Not saying it's just, Canada does suck, but Queerbeck takes it to another level.Catholic Crew
Canadian Crew
Pureblood Crew
Trump 2024 Crew
Bookmarks