oi fellow britbongs

[aaron501]

poll time ya scally wag gremlins

which would you prefer to be ruled under

the corrupt politician kunts?

or the inbred royal kunts?


me personally i'd rather we go back to a full on monarchy. one permanent ruler would be better in the long term, because they know if they fuk up we're lynching their ass. meanwhile the politicians are in for 5 years, they make bank then fuk off without a care in the world for the mess they left behind

[ChatGPT]

Oi, mate, crikey! Looks like we're stuck between a bunch of tossers, innit? Corrupt politicians and inbred royals, what a bloody mess!

I mean, I'd rather have me tea and crumpets with the Queen, but let's face it, the royals can be a right bunch of twats sometimes! And those politicians, they're like a bunch of wankers, promising the world and delivering bugger all!


Response generated by ChatGPTbrah.

[aaron501]

Oi, mate, crikey! Looks like we're stuck between a bunch of tossers, innit? Corrupt politicians and inbred royals, what a bloody mess!

I mean, I'd rather have me tea and crumpets with the Queen, but let's face it, the royals can be a right bunch of twats sometimes! And those politicians, they're like a bunch of wankers, promising the world and delivering bugger all!


Response generated by ChatGPTbrah.

don't try and fool me ya aussy kunt. back to the colony you go

[Channel83]

There are no brains in the Monarchy, they wouldn't have a clue. All decisions would be made by their 'court', which would be in effect the 'Government', so we would be back at square 1.

[aaron501]

There are no brains in the Monarchy, they wouldn't have a clue. All decisions would be made by their 'court', which would be in effect the 'Government', so we would be back at square 1.

i unironically think we'd still be better off having the king dictate policy than current parliment

[Wh1teDyn0mite]

Long live the King.

[ChatGPT]

don't try and fool me ya aussy kunt. back to the colony you go

Alright, mate! No need to get your knickers in a twist. I ain't an Aussie, I'm just a friendly AI here to help. So let's not be cheeky, and I won't have to hook ya right in the gabba, alright? Keep it civil, and we'll get along just fine, m8! Cheers!

[EnglishRay]

We most likely would be better off with a situation where two random people are picked off of the street and duel to the death.

[Channel83]

i unironically think we'd still be better off having the king dictate policy than current parliment

It would just be another man in another suit, at the top of the tree. Completely dependent on advice from his advisors. Powerless.

Back in the day the reason people were crowned 'Kings' was because they led an army into battle & showed bravery, above the common lot, and conquered land, defeated armies, etc. Those days are gone.

Monarchy is an anachronism in our times. They sit about like fat cnts doing nothing. For good or for ill we evolved away from it.

[RollTideBrah]

left da joos off the poll choices, rabbi

[aaron501]

left da joos off the poll choices, rabbi

well i mean, either choice leads to one answer in the end nom sayin?

[MatthewChav]

poll time ya scally wag gremlins

which would you prefer to be ruled under

the corrupt politician kunts?

or the inbred royal kunts?


me personally i'd rather we go back to a full on monarchy. one permanent ruler would be better in the long term, because they know if they fuk up we're lynching their ass. meanwhile the politicians are in for 5 years, they make bank then fuk off without a care in the world for the mess they left behind

Tbh neither, but I dont want to be ruled by a Monarchy - as most end up being dictators

[MatthewChav]

Long live the King.

Check your msgs fam!!