My buddy can do 16 plate leg press full rom but only 160 on leg extensions and curls…
I can only do 10 plats on leg press full rom but 245lb+45 hung off the pin for leg extensions and 240+25lb hung off pin on curls……why is he stronger than me on press but weaker on isolation? Full rom for him is 3-4 inches away from bottoming out press on owest setting…mine is kissing the rubber…idk if that helps
|
Thread: need strength help
-
06-05-2023, 04:19 PM #1
need strength help
-
06-05-2023, 05:35 PM #2
- Join Date: Jul 2006
- Location: Bangkok, Thailand
- Age: 34
- Posts: 7,213
- Rep Power: 7470
The Leg Press is probably the worst gauge of strength.
I'd say you should both do squats, same form either parallel or full-ROM, and see where your sticking points are or how and where your form breaks down. That would be a better way to tell your weak areas.https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=180003183&p=1635918623#post1635918623
New Shanghai Log!
"225, 315, 405 whatever. Yeah these benchmark digits come to mean a lot to us, the few warriors in this arena. They are, however, just numbers. I'm guilty of that sh*t too, waiting for somebody to powder my nuts cuz I did 20 reps of whatever the **** on the bench. Big f*king deal. It is all relative." G Diesel
-
06-06-2023, 07:39 AM #3
I don't count it as a true gauge of strength unless it has all three parts of an exercise's range of motion - concentric, eccentric, and isometric. Machines don't give you that, they're meant for special usage, like rehabilitation and isolation. I knew a guy once, could leg press around 1200 but up against a dumbbell front squat he was lucky if he could do a few reps with 20's. Free weight and bodyweight can be very humbling and a way better test of strength than comfy machines can.
Back to basics full body routine: https://pastebin.com/5BgKgrMv
Training journal: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=178059671&p=1598034261#post1598034261
-
06-06-2023, 08:31 AM #4
-
-
06-06-2023, 01:13 PM #5
Don't machines have a concentric, an eccentric and an isometric?
I would say the difference between machines and free weights = the ROM is fixed vs different directions
Come on!
Not saying I don't believe you, but this has to be 1 in a million.
Maybe he used a partial ROM on press and had some mobility issues on the squat.I like to learn from the mistakes of the people who take my advice.
-
06-07-2023, 03:44 PM #6
-
06-07-2023, 05:29 PM #7
- Join Date: Jul 2006
- Location: Bangkok, Thailand
- Age: 34
- Posts: 7,213
- Rep Power: 7470
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=180003183&p=1635918623#post1635918623
New Shanghai Log!
"225, 315, 405 whatever. Yeah these benchmark digits come to mean a lot to us, the few warriors in this arena. They are, however, just numbers. I'm guilty of that sh*t too, waiting for somebody to powder my nuts cuz I did 20 reps of whatever the **** on the bench. Big f*king deal. It is all relative." G Diesel
-
06-08-2023, 05:28 AM #8
-
-
06-08-2023, 07:46 AM #9
-
06-09-2023, 06:06 PM #10
Do a proper freeweight exercise as a litmus test if raw strength is your goal. There's an argument to be made for efficient localized hypertrophy in the case of lean bodybuilders who use machines but if raw strength is your goal, machines are not going to be your flagship lifts.
Bench: 335
Squat: 405
Deadlift: 505
"... But always, there remained, the discipline of steel!"
-
06-11-2023, 08:04 AM #11
Different strength curves. Between any two exercises really, but overall strength can be a factor (consistency more or less between exercises).
Intensity is hard and stability is hard. You can't really get rid of one or the other for convincing strength assessment. Intensity on the machines won't get very far in progression without proper stability. Squats can be unreliable indication too if the form is compromised in some way... but it's mostly coming down to particular curves on the LE as I was saying also.
-
06-11-2023, 09:52 PM #12
You have different strength curves even on only free weight exercises. BOR has a different strength curve than BP.
I don't understand why you cannot really get rid of the stability part because:
1. you need stability on machines. Especially on plate loaded ones, with low reps, you need stability.
2. There is a spectrum regarding stability. Machines are more stable than barbells, but barbells are LESS stable than bodyweight exercises and cable exercises. Also, dumbbells are even more unstable. A one arm one leg squat push press on a bosu ball is really unstable.
3. The way I see it, all of them {bb, db, cb, mh, bw} have {well, it depends on the person using them}:
a) concentric part
b) eccentric part
c) isometric part
d) intensity
e) stability - more or less, in this order: MH < BB < BW < CB < DB < unilateral exercises on unstable surfacesI like to learn from the mistakes of the people who take my advice.
Bookmarks