Reply
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User eliasyerbez's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2023
    Age: 54
    Posts: 1
    Rep Power: 0
    eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100) eliasyerbez is not very well liked. (-100)
    eliasyerbez is offline

    Squat low bar vs high bar

    Hi guys.

    The low bar squat is better for the posterior chain (hamstrings and glutes)

    While the high bar squat is better for the anterior chain.

    Does anyone know if this statement is true or is it just a myth?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Banned MrTitan75's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2023
    Age: 54
    Posts: 3
    Rep Power: 0
    MrTitan75 is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    MrTitan75 is offline
    Originally Posted by sweatstrength View Post
    The low bar squat and the high bar squat are two of the most popular squat variations. They are both compound exercises that target multiple muscle groups in the lower body, including the quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes. However, there is some debate about which version is more effective for building strength and muscle mass.

    The main difference between the two is the placement of the barbell on the back. In the high bar squat, the barbell rests on the upper traps, just below the base of the neck. This position allows for a more upright torso angle, which puts more emphasis on the quadriceps and allows for greater depth in the squat.

    In contrast, the low bar squat involves placing the barbell lower on the back, across the rear delts and scapula. This position allows for a more forward lean, which places more emphasis on the posterior chain muscles, such as the hamstrings and glutes.

    So, is it true that the low bar squat is better for the posterior chain, while the high bar squat is better for the anterior chain? The answer is yes, but with some caveats.

    The low bar squat is indeed more effective for building strength in the posterior chain muscles. This is because the position of the barbell allows for a greater range of motion in the hips, which is necessary for engaging the hamstrings and glutes. The low bar squat also places less stress on the knees, making it a good option for lifters with knee issues.

    On the other hand, the high bar squat is better for developing the quadriceps. The more upright torso angle allows for a deeper squat, which puts more stress on the quads. Additionally, the high bar squat is easier to perform for most lifters, as it requires less mobility in the hips and ankles.

    That being said, it's important to note that both squat variations are effective for building overall lower body strength and muscle mass. The choice between low bar and high bar squats ultimately comes down to personal preference and individual goals.

    If you're looking to improve your performance in powerlifting or other strength sports, the low bar squat may be a better option. However, if you're primarily interested in building size and definition in your legs, the high bar squat may be more appropriate.

    It's worth mentioning that there are other squat variations, such as the front squat and the goblet squat, that can also be effective for building lower body strength and muscle mass. Incorporating a variety of squat variations into your training program can help you avoid overuse injuries and achieve a more well-rounded physique.

    In conclusion, the statement that the low bar squat is better for the posterior chain and the high bar squat is better for the anterior chain is generally true. However, both squat variations are effective for building overall lower body strength and muscle mass, and the choice between them should be based on individual goals and preferences.
    i can totally agree with what you said here
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User Lymnenews5e2q's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2022
    Age: 54
    Posts: 51
    Rep Power: 0
    Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000) Lymnenews5e2q is a complete loser! (-2000)
    Lymnenews5e2q is offline
    The low bar squat is better for the posterior chain (hamstrings and glutes)

    While the high bar squat is better for the anterior chain.

    Does anyone know if this statement is true or is it just a myth?
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Banned AsianPepper's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2023
    Age: 54
    Posts: 16
    Rep Power: 0
    AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) AsianPepper has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    AsianPepper is offline
    put bar on penor and ezmoney
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts