Kari Lake files lawsuit in bid to overturn Arizona election

[Procta]

https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/...98641507946496

What do you think will occur?

truth, uncovering a bad election process that would lead to correction

not expecting anything to be over turned

[metroins]

https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/...98641507946496

truth, uncovering a bad election process that would lead to correction

not expecting anything to be over turned

[Img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fj47ywVVsAA2y42?format=jpg&name=medium[/immg]

I think they'll get a fair hearing. So far the judge is going by the book and making everything public instead of hiding from it

Looks like he's an elected judge.

I haven't read the suit, but I don't think it's the judges job to uncover any election process at this stage. I think he's supposed to dismiss the suit and she files a separate suit about election process that doesn't include anything results related.

But maybe that is what she has already done, like I said I didn't read it.

[Stizzel]

Looks like he's an elected judge.

I haven't read the suit, but I don't think it's the judges job to uncover any election process at this stage. I think he's supposed to dismiss the suit and she files a separate suit about election process that doesn't include anything results related.

But maybe that is what she has already done, like I said I didn't read it.

I think the most likely outcome if he rules in favor of kari is a re-do election that isnt run by katie hobbs and the maricopa county board

[Phil9]

Sillie pls

^Thought Cyber Ninjas would install Trump as El Presidente. Lulz

I think the most likely outcome if he rules in favor of kari is a re-do election that isnt run by katie hobbs and the maricopa county board

This bald retard is what mental disease looks like.

[hardcock]

Sillie pls

I love how you're too busy grooming children to actually address the points people make. you just call names, accuse people of being someone else, etc. You are, without a doubt, the worst poster here, as well as a flaming homosexual.

[hardcock]

^Thought Cyber Ninjas would install Trump as El Presidente. Lulz








This bald retard is what mental disease looks like.

Why can I not rep you again? Damn.

[Kraken]

The evidence is pretty overwhelming. If this gets thrown out, we will know this is political/cold warfare and these rogue counties must be dealt with for the future of our REPUBLIC.

[rampagefc77]

The evidence is pretty overwhelming. If this gets thrown out, we will know this is political/cold warfare and these rogue counties must be dealt with for the future of our REPUBLIC.

Pretty impressive what they’ve been able to compile in a matter of weeks. Investigations of this sort, to fully unravel what has taken place, could take years. And that’s the goal, you need to jump through so many hoops to get the info that it becomes way too far past the date of the election to do anything about it.

[Stizzel]

^Thought Cyber Ninjas would install Trump as El Presidente. Lulz

Thats because you keep it 68 24/7

[hardcock]

The evidence is pretty overwhelming. If this gets thrown out, we will know this is political/cold warfare and these rogue counties must be dealt with for the future of our REPUBLIC.

You mean the same kind of evidence presented in the Big Lie? It's funny, just like Trump, this b*tch was claiming fraud months before getting curb-stomped. She filed a frivolous lawsuit in April to try to get only paper ballots used. Like that would've stopped her from getting embarrassed at the polls.

[Kraken]

You mean the same kind of evidence presented in the Big Lie? It's funny, just like Trump, this b*tch was claiming fraud months before getting curb-stomped. She filed a frivolous lawsuit in April to try to get only paper ballots used. Like that would've stopped her from getting embarrassed at the polls.

What evidence cited in the suit do you think is irrelevant or fake?

[hardcock]

What evidence do you think is irrelevant or fake?

You're the one who said there is overwhelming evidence. I asked for examples of said evidence. To which you respond with a question. I guess you're talking out of your fat ass again.

Her evidence is a poll taken. That's her "evidence." LOL. What a joke. They filed a motion to inspect the ballots. How do they know illegal ballots were cast if they haven't inspected them yet? LOL. What a loser. A sore loser.

[Kraken]

You're the one who said there is overwhelming evidence. I asked for examples of said evidence. To which you respond with a question. I guess you're talking out of your fat ass again.

Her evidence is a poll taken. That's her "evidence." LOL. What a joke. They filed a motion to inspect the ballots. How do they know illegal ballots were cast if they haven't inspected them yet? LOL. What a loser. A sore loser.

The lawsuit is public. You can look it up. It’s not a “poll”. Stop being dishonest and avoiding the facts.

[miscinbro]

The lawsuit is public. You can look it up. It’s not a “poll”. Stop being dishonest and avoiding the facts.

Says the liar.

[hardcock]

The lawsuit is public. You can look it up. It’s not a “poll”. Stop being dishonest and avoiding the facts.

Yes. I read it. You're telling me a f*cking poll is evidence that someone cast an illegal ballot? Come on, man. You're better than that. Anyhow, you're the one that said there is evidence, so, the burden of proof is on you, cocksucker.

[Stizzel]

Says the liar.

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.go...ddocument/4151

Seems like he's telling the truth

[Kraken]

Yes. I read it. You're telling me a f*cking poll is evidence that someone cast an illegal ballot? Come on, man. You're better than that. Anyhow, you're the one that said there is evidence, so, the burden of proof is on you, cocksucker.

I’m not the one who filed the lawsuit. YOU’RE the one that misrepresented the evidence. YOU made an argument there was no evidence. You’re low IQ if you think that burden is on me.

[hardcock]

The lawsuit is public. You can look it up. It’s not a “poll”. Stop being dishonest and avoiding the facts.

Could you read point 1 out loud to the class, cocksucker: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.go...ddocument/4151

"On November 30, 2022 Rasmussen reports published a.....a what.....a....POLL....of likely U.S. voters....

Go f*ck yourself.

[Kraken]

Could you read point 1 out loud to the class, cocksucker: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.go...ddocument/4151

"On November 30, 2022 Rasmussen reports published a.....a what.....a....POLL....of likely U.S. voters....

Go f*ck yourself.

Did you just cherry pick that entire file? How many points did you exclude to make your argument?

[hardcock]

I’m not the one who filed the lawsuit. YOU’RE the one that misrepresented the evidence. YOU made an argument there was no evidence. You’re low IQ if you think that burden is on me.

Please show where I said there is no evidence. Please link to that post. I'm fairly certain I merely asked you what evidence that you were referring to, cocksucker.

[hardcock]

Did you just cherry pick that entire file? How many points did you exclude to make your argument?

No, groomer, you're the one that said that a poll is not being introduced as evidence. Not only is one being used, it's the first thing they mention. Just proving you wrong, groomer.

[miscinbro]

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.go...ddocument/4151

Seems like he's telling the truth

He lied about a Supreme Court Justice’s record in another thread. I called him out multiple times. He ignored all of them.

[Kraken]

Please show where I said there is no evidence. Please link to that post. I'm fairly certain I merely asked you what evidence that you were referring to, cocksucker.

Her evidence is a poll taken. That's her "evidence." LOL. What a joke.

You going to deny the implications of this comment? I always find it amusing that someone with low IQ underestimates the IQ of those around them. It’s quite a delusion.

[hardcock]

He lied about a Supreme Court Justice’s record in another thread. I called him out multiple times. He ignored all of them.

Don't argue with Stizzel. His puny brain cannot process facts and logic. He can only respond to conspiracy theories. You see, he was groomed from a young age and is mentally stunted at that age. Now he grooms.

[hardcock]

You going to deny the implications of this comment? I always find it amusing that someone with low IQ underestimates the IQ of those around them. It’s quite a delusion.

Again, show some proof of wrongdoing. Just saying there was fraud without real proof doesn't get the job done. I guess the failure of Donald Trump didn't teach you that.

[TsarChasm]

I was alive, yes. Hillary never claimed to win, she never alleged massive voter fraud or that the American people had been robbed of their chosen leader, she did not file frivolous lawsuits, nor did she have a perverted mouthpiece (rudy g) going on about bamboo ballots and other BS.

You must not remember 4 years of Russian Collusion conspiracy theory that every media network was complicit in. Instead of lawsuits it was frivolous impeachment attempts and witch hunts. Instead of Rudy G it was the entire corporate media enterprise. They literally still to this day think that Russia hacked our election.

[Kraken]

Again, show some proof of wrongdoing. Just saying there was fraud without real proof doesn't get the job done. I guess the failure of Donald Trump didn't teach you that.

The suit is about disenfranchisement.

1. Dems have the highest turn out of mail in ballots. Maricopa county spent vasts amount of time correcting and changing mail in ballots. This is why the counting took so long.

2. Republicans have the highest turn out of in person voting. A large % of machines went down as in-person voters came in to vote, being told by election officials to either go someplace else or to submit ballots in to unauthorized boxes that had no chain of custody.

3. The poll was to see how many people may have been affected by these issues.

4. The discrepancies indicate it was enough to overturn the results. This is the math issue that was brought up previously; when election fraud reaches a critical point, the math can prove it. This is the ONLY way to theoretically prove fraud when it’s hidden. It’s so much that the math doesn’t compute.

[z4v4]

The lawsuit is public. You can look it up. It’s not a “poll”. Stop being dishonest and avoiding the facts.

I've skimmed it. It starts off with a Rasmussen poll asserting that 72% of likely US voters agree with Kari Lake that the election was botched. What Kari Lake thinks and what polls of "likely US voters" think is not evidence.

A single ballot envelope signature from 2020 is not evidence of anything in 2022. So, if you think there is demonstrable evidence, point out where in the document. Each page is marked and each line is numbered. Show us the good stuff, son, and give us page and line numbers.

[Phil9]

Could you read point 1 out loud to the class, cocksucker: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.go...ddocument/4151

"On November 30, 2022 Rasmussen reports published a.....a what.....a....POLL....of likely U.S. voters....

Go f*ck yourself.

The Kraken has finally been unleashed and it's a bald incel with chitty tattoos. How underwhelming...

The suit is about disenfranchisement.

1. Dems have the highest turn out of mail in ballots. Maricopa county spent vasts amount of time correcting and changing mail in ballots. This is why the counting took so long.

Clearly there's cheating if one side has more mail in ballots than the other side. I mean, how dare an election not have an equal amount of votes? Outrageous!

I've skimmed it. It starts off with a Rasmussen poll asserting that 72% of likely US voters agree with Kari Lake that the election was botched. What Kari Lake thinks and what polls of "likely US voters" think is not evidence.

A single ballot envelope signature from 2020 is not evidence of anything in 2022. So, if you think there is demonstrable evidence, point out where in the document. Each page is marked and each line is numbered. Show us the good stuff, son, and give us page and line numbers.

They are denying Kari Lake supplied a Rasmussen poll as evidence when it's the very first thing cited in the summary lol.

[Stizzel]

Please show where I said there is no evidence. Please link to that post. I'm fairly certain I merely asked you what evidence that you were referring to, cocksucker.

Section 1 alleges that public trust in the outcome has been destroyed by the incompetence of the people running the election, and cites a poll supporting that claim. Just stop embarrassing yourself sillie, you're out of your league