Kari Lake files lawsuit in bid to overturn Arizona election

[XterraRob]

Pretty impressive what they’ve been able to compile in a matter of weeks. Investigations of this sort, to fully unravel what has taken place, could take years. And that’s the goal, you need to jump through so many hoops to get the info that it becomes way too far past the date of the election to do anything about it.

I want them to emphasize the voter roll manipulation. This needs to be a major issue in AZ and everywhere. And validate the changes made around election day and after.

Are they real people? Did these people actually vote?

[hardcock]

He lied about a Supreme Court Justice’s record in another thread. I called him out multiple times. He ignored all of them.

Don't argue with Stizzel. His puny brain cannot process facts and logic. He can only respond to conspiracy theories. You see, he was groomed from a young age and is mentally stunted at that age. Now he grooms.

[hardcock]

You going to deny the implications of this comment? I always find it amusing that someone with low IQ underestimates the IQ of those around them. It’s quite a delusion.

Again, show some proof of wrongdoing. Just saying there was fraud without real proof doesn't get the job done. I guess the failure of Donald Trump didn't teach you that.

[TsarChasm]

I was alive, yes. Hillary never claimed to win, she never alleged massive voter fraud or that the American people had been robbed of their chosen leader, she did not file frivolous lawsuits, nor did she have a perverted mouthpiece (rudy g) going on about bamboo ballots and other BS.

You must not remember 4 years of Russian Collusion conspiracy theory that every media network was complicit in. Instead of lawsuits it was frivolous impeachment attempts and witch hunts. Instead of Rudy G it was the entire corporate media enterprise. They literally still to this day think that Russia hacked our election.

[Kraken]

Again, show some proof of wrongdoing. Just saying there was fraud without real proof doesn't get the job done. I guess the failure of Donald Trump didn't teach you that.

The suit is about disenfranchisement.

1. Dems have the highest turn out of mail in ballots. Maricopa county spent vasts amount of time correcting and changing mail in ballots. This is why the counting took so long.

2. Republicans have the highest turn out of in person voting. A large % of machines went down as in-person voters came in to vote, being told by election officials to either go someplace else or to submit ballots in to unauthorized boxes that had no chain of custody.

3. The poll was to see how many people may have been affected by these issues.

4. The discrepancies indicate it was enough to overturn the results. This is the math issue that was brought up previously; when election fraud reaches a critical point, the math can prove it. This is the ONLY way to theoretically prove fraud when it’s hidden. It’s so much that the math doesn’t compute.

[XterraRob]

You must not remember 4 years of Russian Collusion conspiracy theory that every media network was complicit in. Instead of lawsuits it was frivolous impeachment attempts and witch hunts. Instead of Rudy G it was the entire corporate media enterprise. They literally still to this day think that Russia hacked our election.

You'll waste your time with that Liberal child molester. He's just fishing for attention and someone to be argumentative with.

[z4v4]

The lawsuit is public. You can look it up. It’s not a “poll”. Stop being dishonest and avoiding the facts.

I've skimmed it. It starts off with a Rasmussen poll asserting that 72% of likely US voters agree with Kari Lake that the election was botched. What Kari Lake thinks and what polls of "likely US voters" think is not evidence.

A single ballot envelope signature from 2020 is not evidence of anything in 2022. So, if you think there is demonstrable evidence, point out where in the document. Each page is marked and each line is numbered. Show us the good stuff, son, and give us page and line numbers.

[Phil9]

Could you read point 1 out loud to the class, cocksucker: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.go...ddocument/4151

"On November 30, 2022 Rasmussen reports published a.....a what.....a....POLL....of likely U.S. voters....

Go f*ck yourself.

The Kraken has finally been unleashed and it's a bald incel with chitty tattoos. How underwhelming...

The suit is about disenfranchisement.

1. Dems have the highest turn out of mail in ballots. Maricopa county spent vasts amount of time correcting and changing mail in ballots. This is why the counting took so long.

Clearly there's cheating if one side has more mail in ballots than the other side. I mean, how dare an election not have an equal amount of votes? Outrageous!

I've skimmed it. It starts off with a Rasmussen poll asserting that 72% of likely US voters agree with Kari Lake that the election was botched. What Kari Lake thinks and what polls of "likely US voters" think is not evidence.

A single ballot envelope signature from 2020 is not evidence of anything in 2022. So, if you think there is demonstrable evidence, point out where in the document. Each page is marked and each line is numbered. Show us the good stuff, son, and give us page and line numbers.

They are denying Kari Lake supplied a Rasmussen poll as evidence when it's the very first thing cited in the summary lol.

[Stizzel]

Please show where I said there is no evidence. Please link to that post. I'm fairly certain I merely asked you what evidence that you were referring to, cocksucker.

Section 1 alleges that public trust in the outcome has been destroyed by the incompetence of the people running the election, and cites a poll supporting that claim. Just stop embarrassing yourself sillie, you're out of your league

[Phil9]

Section 1 alleges that public trust in the outcome has been destroyed by the incompetence of the people running the election, and cites a poll supporting that claim. Just stop embarrassing yourself sillie, you're out of your league

Fat James Carville with the copium.

[z4v4]

Section 1 alleges that public trust in the outcome has been destroyed by the incompetence of the people running the election, and cites a poll supporting that claim. Just stop embarrassing yourself sillie, you're out of your league

Alleges... yeah, son, allegations are solid to bring forth in a lawsuit. LMAO.

[Kraken]

Alleges... yeah, son, allegations are solid to bring forth in a lawsuit. LMAO.

They are all allegations until proven in a court of law. lmao! What an idiot.

[Stizzel]

Alleges... yeah, son, allegations are solid to bring forth in a lawsuit. LMAO.

Cringe

[Jayarbie]

https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/...98641507946496



truth, uncovering a bad election process that would lead to correction

not expecting anything to be over turned

If the outcome of this is changes to the election process that would make it harder to file these stupid frivolous sore loser lawsuits, then that's fine.

[XterraRob]

Section 1 alleges that public trust in the outcome has been destroyed by the incompetence of the people running the election, and cites a poll supporting that claim. Just stop embarrassing yourself sillie, you're out of your league

Public Trust is a good argument. Voting machine marketing discusses why their tolerances/threshholds for operations are so strict... because it's to help the public's trust.

And... across the country the Dominion machines are not operating to their own standards. It's hilarious how widespread the problem was in Maricopa for Nov 2022. No normal person would look at that and say there was nothing wrong with the machines.

[Phil9]

If the outcome of this is changes to the election process that would make it harder to file these stupid frivolous sore loser lawsuits, then that's fine.

Then what would people like Snizz have to do with their lives [Outside of cuck for Russia of course]? He might have to actually leave the basement.

[Kraken]

1. Making changes or corrections to mail in ballots is fraud/illegal.

2. Disenfranchisement is part of voter integrity and individuals have the legal right to call it in question.

3. Chain of custody must remain consistent and within the law.

A reasonable person would question if the results of the election are legit, considering the three circumstances here, directly affecting the two political parties completely differently. We have bad actors, helping the Democrats, while simultaneously being completely incompetent with Republicans.

Plainly put, this is not a fair election and can be objectively argued with metrics and different treatment.

[Stizzel]

Public Trust is a good argument. Voting machine marketing discusses why their tolerances/threshholds for operations are so strict... because it's to help the public's trust.

And... across the country the Dominion machines are not operating to their own standards. It's hilarious how widespread the problem was in Maricopa for Nov 2022. No normal person would look at that and say there was nothing wrong with the machines.

She has an affidavit from one of the techs the county hired to work on the machines stating the only way they could malfunction the way they did was to be intentionally sabotaged

[Phil9]

She has an affidavit from one of the techs the county hired to work on the machines stating the only way they could malfunction the way they did was to be intentionally sabotaged

Republicans sabotaged the machines and still lost?


Rough.

[ghostfacedup]

Republicans sabotaged the machines and still lost?


Rough.

This "dude" supports the party of Elizabeth Warren, LMAO.

[Phil9]

This "dude" supports the party of Elizabeth Warren, LMAO.

Shouldn't you be donating more money to Karen Lake's "Stop the Steal" initiative?

[hardcock]

You must not remember 4 years of Russian Collusion conspiracy theory that every media network was complicit in. Instead of lawsuits it was frivolous impeachment attempts and witch hunts. Instead of Rudy G it was the entire corporate media enterprise. They literally still to this day think that Russia hacked our election.

So answer my question, groomer, how many lawsuits did she file that got laughed out of court like Trump did?

[hardcock]

The suit is about disenfranchisement.

1. Dems have the highest turn out of mail in ballots. Maricopa county spent vasts amount of time correcting and changing mail in ballots. This is why the counting took so long.

2. Republicans have the highest turn out of in person voting. A large % of machines went down as in-person voters came in to vote, being told by election officials to either go someplace else or to submit ballots in to unauthorized boxes that had no chain of custody.

3. The poll was to see how many people may have been affected by these issues.

4. The discrepancies indicate it was enough to overturn the results. This is the math issue that was brought up previously; when election fraud reaches a critical point, the math can prove it. This is the ONLY way to theoretically prove fraud when it’s hidden. It’s so much that the math doesn’t compute.

Disenfranchisement is not a violation of law, groomer. Find some actual violations backed by proof, not your feels.

[hardcock]

You'll waste your time with that Liberal child molester. He's just fishing for attention and someone to be argumentative with.

contacting my attorney now to sue both you and BB.com for libel. Calling me a child molester is libel and you will pay for that. I mean, you would pay if you weren't sitting on your fat ass collecting welfare. The judgement in my favor will be purely symbolic.

[hardcock]

Section 1 alleges that public trust in the outcome has been destroyed by the incompetence of the people running the election, and cites a poll supporting that claim. Just stop embarrassing yourself sillie, you're out of your league

a poll is not evidence that proves wrongdoing, groomer. surely you know that.

[NYPat]

Disenfranchisement is not a violation of law, groomer. Find some actual violations backed by proof, not your feels.

Amazing, these retards just KNOW there was fraud. That's literally their argument. Fuking derp.

[hardcock]

Republicans sabotaged the machines and still lost?


Rough.

Yep. Usually when someone cheats, they win. These groomers can't even get that right.

[hardcock]

Amazing, these retards just KNOW there was fraud. That's literally their argument. ****ing derp.

Yep, me and a couple other MAGA-hat wearing feel like the election was stolen because we don't like the outcome. That's indisputable proof, man.

[Noliberals4]

Amazing, these retards just KNOW there was fraud. That's literally their argument. Fuking derp.

It's a very bizarre strategy to say the least.

Instead of running decent candidates that run on policy, their strategy seems to be to nominate nut jobs, lose very badly, and then hope to god they find some fraud in the aftermath.

Kari Lake only lost by like half a point. Imagine if she actually focused on policy and running a somewhat positive campaign instead of insulting everyone and complaining about 2020 every day.....

[Kraken]

Disenfranchisement is not a violation of law, groomer. Find some actual violations backed by proof, not your feels.

According to the left, and Democrats, it is a violation. That was the whole basis for them wanting to move to mail ballots. The entire left was arguing that blacks were disenfranchised, and that was a violation of the law. Using their same argument, it is a violation of the law that in-person voters were disenfranchised.

do you have double standards now?