Why did the Left coin the term "Minor Attracted Person" if there is no agenda?

[Bushmaster]

Answer the question.

I've been asking you for a couple of years why you defend an 80 year old man feeling up a little girl, and you have yet to answer that.

Most recently here..

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...hp?t=182000573

[Derplington]

You were active in the Epstein threads after his arrest, deflecting and downplaying his involvement in any type of organized child trafficking.
You've always participated in threads like this, despite the topic being so "gross" to you, providing defense to whatever is being accused.

Why is that?

As for MAPs, it isn't the Right that's championing this perverted social justice cause.

The term is attributed to activist, convicted child rapist, and co-founder of B4U-Act (p*do support group) Michael F. Melsheimer. The organization is tied to other SJW groups, and vocalized support for the Trans professor Dr. Allyn Walker, who was removed from it's position after trying to promote the term "Minor Attracted Person" as a more neutral way of addressing p*dophilia.

Lol bro are you retarded or just extremely gullible?

[NYPat]

I've been asking you for a couple of years why you defend an 80 year old man feeling up a little girl, and you have yet to answer that.

Answer the question or we're done here.

Do you actually think we support this crap?

[Polaris]

Answer the question or we're done here.

Do you actually think we support this crap?

Why are you incapable of saying "that is wrong"? Paedos who were in the "conservative" institutions like the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts were wrong. Any coverups perpetrated by said institutions...were wrong. Any Republican politician who has engaged is paedo behavior...was wrong. Any republicans or conservatives who advocate for paedo shyt like Drag Queen Story Hour or MAPS (if there are any) are wrong. See how easy that is?

You people refuse to admit (at least when it's "your side" doing it) that it's wrong. All you will do is deflect, screech, double down, etc. Seems like you don't see any issue with it, at the VERY least.

[Bushmaster]

Answer the question or we're done here.

Is that supposed to be some sort of threat?? Go on boy, GTFO.

Do you actually think we support this crap?

You blamed the gif creator for an 80yr old man feeling up a little girl.

Not. Sexual.

For fuks sake look at the wife sandwiched between him and the husband he's speaking to. (if you can, the idiot who edited the gif zoomed in to make it look bad)

Joe has always been a close talker and borderline inappropriate. He was called out for it when his campaign first began and he addressed it.

But don't let that stop you from enjoying whatever stupid circle jerk you guys have going on here beating up on Ben..

Oh and like someone else mentioned, be sure to ignore the fact that Trump BRAGGED about walking in on nude teenagers in his beauty pageant.. that's perfectly fine right Bushboy?

So yeah Pat, I think you support it.

[Polaris]

Well, I think that is a question you are supposed to answer.

Do you support grooming of children?

[SillieBazzillie]

No shiitbag, it's not normal. The point is YOU, Pat, and Benny fight as hard as you can to defend it.

Case in point.













It all stems from this discussion...

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...post1647699653

Your political "enemies" said ped0 books in school libraries were bad and you all disagreed. Didn't you.

Link where I fought against the books being removed please.

Phuking gross ****.

[Bushmaster]

Link where I fought against the books being removed please.

Phuking gross ****.

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...post1647699653

These are books in high schools FFS.

And there are tons of books throughout history that have **** chit like that psycho, religious Karen quoted.

You conservatives in favor of burning books now?

lmfao. 2 books in a high school library with references to **** stuff is now "in the schools"?

I'll wager there were books with similar material in your high schools library. You just didn't know about them because there weren't nutty conservatards outraged over every little thing.

SMH

Denial isn't going to help you.

[Seatard]

Why are you incapable of saying "that is wrong"? Paedos who were in the "conservative" institutions like the Catholic Church and Boy Scouts were wrong. Any coverups perpetrated by said institutions...were wrong. Any Republican politician who has engaged is paedo behavior...was wrong. Any republicans or conservatives who advocate for paedo shyt like Drag Queen Story Hour or MAPS (if there are any) are wrong. See how easy that is?

You people refuse to admit (at least when it's "your side" doing it) that it's wrong. All you will do is deflect, screech, double down, etc. Seems like you don't see any issue with it, at the VERY least.

Correct, it's wrong on every level. Using it for a game of political gotcha is wrong too.

Child abuse is a real problem, if a person wants to speak out about it then great.

But using child abuse simply as a tool to insult and attack strangers on an internet message board might be one of the most pathetic things someone can do.

[SillieBazzillie]

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...post1647699653





Denial isn't going to help you.

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Spitting facts saying there are likely inappropriate books all over is me defending them being there and not wanting them removed?

In that same thread you defended sucking baby diks. I mean you didn't specifically say you were against it so that means you're for it, right ****?

[SillieBazzillie]

Correct, it's wrong on every level. Using it for a game of political gotcha is wrong too.

Child abuse is a real problem, if a person wants to speak out about it then great.

But using child abuse simply as a tool to insult and attack strangers on an internet message board might be one of the most pathetic things someone can do.

And yet it's the go-to for the low IQ, cultist deplorables. We really need these cockroaches to crawl back into the chit from which they came.

Meanwhile, not a single cultist here has said ANYTHING about the **** cop conservative murderer that just happened.

I wonder why...

[Polaris]

But using child abuse simply as a tool to insult and attack strangers on an internet message board might be one of the most pathetic things someone can do.

I think the people defending it is quite pathetic.

[Bushmaster]

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Spitting facts saying there are likely inappropriate books all over is me defending them being there and not wanting them removed?

In that same thread you defended sucking baby diks. I mean you didn't specifically say you were against it so that means you're for it, right ****?

You either think the books belong in school libraries, or you don't.

Your political "enemies" said they don't and you argued and fought against them as hard as you could. Didn't you.

Meanwhile, not a single cultist here has said ANYTHING about the **** cop conservative murderer that just happened.

I wonder why...

Off topic deflection.

[Derplington]

I think the people defending it is quite pathetic.

Who is defending it?

[XterraRob]

Correct, it's wrong on every level. Using it for a game of political gotcha is wrong too.

Child abuse is a real problem, if a person wants to speak out about it then great.

But using child abuse simply as a tool to insult and attack strangers on an internet message board might be one of the most pathetic things someone can do.

Much worse than a political party actually engaging in child exploitation as a political platform?

Nothing to see here.

[SillieBazzillie]

You either think the books belong in school libraries, or you don't.

Your political "enemies" said they don't and you argued and fought against them as hard as you could. Didn't you.



Off topic deflection.

As I've stated MULTIPLE times I 100% think the books are inappropriate for school libraries. But it's also not a sign of grooming as you **** obsessed conservatives were claiming either. And I also said it's unlikely many people would run across the books to it's not a bid deal. Just pull them from the libraries and move on.

Now would you like to talk about why ANOTHER conservative **** killed people? Why didn't you guys learn from the church and boy scouts?

[~Hades~]

Libs love defending ped0s almost as much as they love being ped0s

[Bushmaster]

As I've stated MULTIPLE times I 100% think the books are inappropriate for school libraries. But it's also not a sign of grooming as you **** obsessed conservatives were claiming either. And I also said it's unlikely many people would run across the books to it's not a bid deal. Just pull them from the libraries and move on.

Now would you like to talk about why ANOTHER conservative **** killed people? Why didn't you guys learn from the church and boy scouts?

Then WTF were you arguing about?

Just admit it.. You saw your political "enemies" opposed to something so you automatically took the opposite side. Didn't even matter what it was, you just had to adjust your colostomy bag and dig in your heels. Didn't you.

Why didn't you guys learn from the church and boy scouts?

Learn WHAT Sillie? You keep bringing up the church and the boy scouts as some sort of "gotcha" even though not a single one of your "enemies" here has ever defended them.

[SillieBazzillie]

Then WTF were you arguing about?

Just admit it.. You saw your political "enemies" opposed to something so you automatically took the opposite side. Didn't even matter what it was, you just had to adjust your colostomy bag and dig in your heels. Didn't you.



Learn WHAT Sillie? You keep bringing up the church and the boy scouts as some sort of "gotcha" even though not a single one of your "enemies" here has ever defended them.

NEGATIVE boyo. You ****s were talking non-stop about GROOMING, not about the merits of the books at all. You ****s are obsessed with GROOMING because you are all conservatives and CONSERVATIVE organizations like the church and the boy scouts are the ones actually harming kids. Yet you NEVER ONCE start a thread about that. It's always some deflecting nonsense. "hur dur da bad book be in da libary so libs be grooming hur dur" NEVER ONCE DO YOU TALK ABOUT conservatives CONTINUED financial support for churches and boy scouts. Because you ACCEPT their grooming otherwise you conservatives would stop funding them.

Why are conservatives **** enablers?

[Jayarbie]

You too Jay.

Exactly. I've only ever heard this here, and (unsurprisingly) no one is "re-branding child molestation". In fact, they are doing the exact opposite and trying to prevent p3dophilia from progressing into child molestation. But, you overly emotional snowflakes intellectually incapable of understanding complex arguments (unsurprisingly) can't comprehend a clinical argument made by specialists in the area.

You personally are so stupid you can't even understand the single sentence you bolded from my quote which says the exact opposite of what you are accusing me of. LMAO. Wingnut troglodytes gonna troglodyte.

[Bushmaster]

NEGATIVE boyo. You ****s were talking non-stop about GROOMING, not about the merits of the books at all. You ****s are obsessed with GROOMING because you are all conservatives and CONSERVATIVE organizations like the church and the boy scouts are the ones actually harming kids. Yet you NEVER ONCE start a thread about that. It's always some deflecting nonsense. "hur dur da bad book be in da libary so libs be grooming hur dur" NEVER ONCE DO YOU TALK ABOUT conservatives CONTINUED financial support for churches and boy scouts. Because you ACCEPT their grooming otherwise you conservatives would stop funding them.

Why are conservatives **** enablers?

If you can find some recent examples of church or boy scout ped0s then post them up and we'll discuss. And we have all told you this Ad Nauseum too. None of us are going to defend a ped0 anywhere. That's the difference between you and us.

Yet you refuse to stop deflecting and STFU about it.

Cliffs: You need help motherfuker.

[Derplington]

Exactly. I've only ever heard this here, and (unsurprisingly) no one is "re-branding child molestation". In fact, they are doing the exact opposite and trying to prevent p3dophilia from progressing into child molestation. But, you overly emotional snowflakes intellectually incapable of understanding complex arguments (unsurprisingly) can't comprehend a clinical argument made by specialists in the area.

You personally are so stupid you can't even understand the single sentence you bolded from my quote which says the exact opposite of what you are accusing me of. LMAO. Wingnut troglodytes gonna troglodyte.

Holy chit. Jayarbie with the smackdown.

[Derplington]

If you can find some recent examples of church or boy scout ped0s then post them up and we'll discuss. And we have all told you this Ad Nauseum too. None of us are going to defend a ped0 anywhere. That's the difference between you and us.

Yet you refuse to stop deflecting and STFU about it.

Cliffs: You need help motherfuker.

Lol church molestation cases happen literally every month. It's not hard to Google and find out. I'm sure the quality of this place would drastically improve if a thread was made for each case. That what you want, *******?

[SillieBazzillie]

If you can find some recent examples of church or boy scout ped0s then post them up and we'll discuss. And we have all told you this Ad Nauseum too.

Yet you refuse to stop deflecting and STFU about it.

Cliffs: You need help motherfuker.

Recent examples? So it's cool with you that organizations have done it repeatedly in the past, covered it up for decades, and yet YOU CONSERVATIVES still support them?

So what you're saying is that as long as the **** activity isn't recent, you're good with the organizations or people.

SICK PHUK

Da phuk is wrong with you? You're a scout leader aren't you? Now it all makes a ton of sense.

Wow, who knew that support for **** organizations had a time limit attached to it...and if they hadn't be caught recently SURELY they don't **** anymore...

SICK PHUK

[SillieBazzillie]

Exactly. I've only ever heard this here, and (unsurprisingly) no one is "re-branding child molestation". In fact, they are doing the exact opposite and trying to prevent p3dophilia from progressing into child molestation. But, you overly emotional snowflakes intellectually incapable of understanding complex arguments (unsurprisingly) can't comprehend a clinical argument made by specialists in the area.

You personally are so stupid you can't even understand the single sentence you bolded from my quote which says the exact opposite of what you are accusing me of. LMAO. Wingnut troglodytes gonna troglodyte.

Exactly. Cultist are easily the scum of the earth. They support ****s and think they can deflect that onto liberals.

World would be much better off without them.

[Retoaded]

wait when did the catholic church become a conservative institution?

[SillieBazzillie]

Lol church molestation cases happen literally every month. It's not hard to Google and find out. I'm sure the quality of this place would drastically improve if a thread was made for each case. That what you want, *******?

But what about 2 books in a library??? Who will think of the children? Well other than conservatives while they're actually molesting the kids.

SICK PHUKS.

[SillieBazzillie]

wait when did the catholic church become a conservative institution?

It ain't even close to just the catholic church boyo. And the catholic church was very conservative when the actual stories of the molestation took place. I can link TONS of non-catholic church **** stories. But surely an anti-abortion/pro-sky fairie org is very bigly liberal...

SMH

[Bushmaster]

Recent examples? So it's cool with you that organizations have done it repeatedly in the past, covered it up for decades, and yet YOU CONSERVATIVES still support them?

So what you're saying is that as long as the **** activity isn't recent, you're good with the organizations or people.

SICK PHUK

Da phuk is wrong with you? You're a scout leader aren't you? Now it all makes a ton of sense.

Wow, who knew that support for **** organizations had a time limit attached to it...and if they hadn't be caught recently SURELY they don't **** anymore...

SICK PHUK

My god... You are legit unhinged AF.

Why are you so defensive Sillie? You swear you don't support the ped0 books in schools - yet you sure seemed passionate in defending them. Your very own president is on video feeling up a little girl - yet you defend him. And on, and on...

[Derplington]

It ain't even close to just the catholic church boyo. And the catholic church is like 50/50 now but was very conservative when the actual stories of the molestation took place. I can link TONS of non-catholic church **** stories.

Religious institutions are full of rapists. Just lol at believing in a major organized religion. Supporting child rapists worldwide.