|
-
05-03-2021, 10:02 PM #61
-
05-03-2021, 10:53 PM #62
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 23,804
- Rep Power: 266934
-
05-03-2021, 10:54 PM #63
from your link:
---------------------------------------
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease
Timothy Cardozo 1, Ronald Veazey 2
Affiliations
1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
2 Division of Comparative Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, USA.
PMID: 33113270 PMCID: PMC7645850 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13795
Abstract
Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.
Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.
Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
---------------------------------------
That's a huge issue and has the potential to kill and maim many many millions of unaware, uninformed, foolish people in the next few years, and may already be responsible for many deaths among the vaccinated.
and the vaccine providers [all of whom are partners to the global cabal of the World Economic Forum, creators and organizers of the Great Reset ] are completely absolved of lawsuit liability should it happen.
Here's the Wikipedia article for ADE -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibo...nt_enhancement
-
05-03-2021, 11:38 PM #64
Paul Kreul really is that special ed kid
posts a study which is half about ADE, unfortunately he didn't post this quote
Current data on COVID‐19 vaccines is limited, but does not so far reveal evidence of ADE of disease.
oh! a rubbish scientific paper with no data or evidence!
he doesn't even read the studies he posts
sad!
unfortunately for Mr. Kreul, studies came out saying ADE is not a concern, your "study" was a little old there, pal.
Last edited by xbluexhawkx; 05-03-2021 at 11:43 PM.
Balanced Test Crew
-
-
05-04-2021, 01:57 AM #65
Pediatrician here. I do not know why it is taking so long to get the EUA approval, I thought it would be done last week. I cannot wait to have more of my patients get the vaccine.
For those talking about long term effects, there typically are no long term effects from vaccines that are not seen in the first two months after getting them. So if studies are at least two months long you will have a very good idea of what the long term effects will be.My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
-
05-04-2021, 04:03 AM #66
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 45,365
- Rep Power: 401393
-
05-04-2021, 04:59 AM #67
Did he? The total number of children deaths from covid is very low. We're still figuring out these vaccines, with no long term studies done whatsoever.
Btw, why all the hate on Biden from everyone? He's playing the media, pretending he cares, taking the mask off the second the media turns their back. Yes, it's virtue signaling, but clearly he doesn't give a fuk about masks, either.All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
-
05-04-2021, 05:04 AM #68
-
-
05-04-2021, 05:14 AM #69
-
05-04-2021, 05:14 AM #70
-
05-04-2021, 05:29 AM #71
-
05-04-2021, 05:32 AM #72
-
-
05-04-2021, 05:34 AM #73
When it gets approved at that age, yes. The sooner we get all kids vaccinated the sooner all the schools can go back to normal. Also, while very few children die from COVID-19, we do see cases of MIS-C and I've seen several patients who've had fatigue and other lasting effects from COVID-19 for months.
On the other hand, I do not anticipate any long-lasting side effects from the vaccine, if none are seen in clinical trials.My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
-
05-04-2021, 05:47 AM #74
-
05-04-2021, 05:52 AM #75
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 45,365
- Rep Power: 401393
-
05-04-2021, 05:57 AM #76
I didn't say they should be required. I have lots of anti-vaxxers in my practice; nobody forces them to get vaccines. Regarding the need for booster shots, time will tell. Currently it's unclear how long immunity will last and what impact new variants will have.
Yes, I want people to get vaccinated so life can get back to normal but also so people will be protected from COVID-19.
I really don't expect long-lasting side-effects from a vaccine IF there is no evidence of any side-effect in the first 2 months. There is no reason for me to think a vaccine will not cause a side-effects in the first 2 months and then start causing side-effects later on. To my knowledge that has never been demonstrated; if anyone has links/evidence to counter this point please educate me as I'd really appreciate it.My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
-
-
05-04-2021, 06:08 AM #77
-
05-04-2021, 06:15 AM #78
-
05-04-2021, 06:20 AM #79
-
05-04-2021, 06:28 AM #80
-
-
05-04-2021, 06:45 AM #81
There are some cases of people getting COVID-19 twice and the second round being worst than the first. There is also probably going to be waning immunity after initial infection and so getting vaccinated may provide more protection long term. So I do advise people who have had COVID-19 to get vaccinated. I myself had COVID-19 at the end of November and I got my first vaccine write around the time of Christmas and my second vaccine one month later (Moderna).
I've said many times on this forum if anyone wants me to provide proof to a mod that I'm a physician I'd be happy to do so. I never said anything here about giving people medications, I have been talking generally regarding getting vaccinated. I generally try to avoid prescribing meds that are not available over the counter if I can help it.My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
-
05-04-2021, 06:52 AM #82
-
05-04-2021, 07:33 AM #83
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 7,556
- Rep Power: 50145
Why is the determining factor for covid simply the death rate while the determining factor for the vaccine the unknown long term side effects? Why do you not account for the unknown long term side effects of covid?
What if covid is like the varicella zoster virus which causes chickenpox as a kid, then sits dormant in your body for decades, and then suddenly comes back as shingles? But what of covid is worse when it reemerges?
I just think it's so ironic how people are sooooo scared of the long term side effects of the vaccine but don't give a shyt about the long term side effects of the virus.Never neg first but always neg back crew
-
05-04-2021, 07:35 AM #84
For many infections immunity wanes over time, and this is seen with coronaviruses and other common cold viruses in general. It's also seen with vaccines which is why people talk about booster shots, though with COVID-19 the other reason people talk about booster shots is to include new variants in the boosters.
My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
-
-
05-04-2021, 07:53 AM #85
I account for them but they're unknown. I also assume there is some correlation between those who have a greater chance of death and having a greater chance of unknown long term side effect.
If someone is in an age group that accounts for 0.09% of all covid deaths, as anyone aged 5-17 is, since there is no real information about these unknown long term side effects, I have to assume they're also looking at greatly reduced odds there, too.
Most people who get covid are fine and suffer mild symptoms, we know this. Children, in particular, are the ones who have the least amount of mortality, it's probably a safe assumption that the same applies to these unknown long term side effects that people keep bringing up as if they're something known to be horrific.
What if covid is like the varicella zoster virus which causes chickenpox as a kid, then sits dormant in your body for decades, and then suddenly comes back as shingles? But what of covid is worse when it reemerges?
I just think it's so ironic how people are sooooo scared of the long term side effects of the vaccine but don't give a shyt about the long term side effects of the virus.
It's not ironic at all.All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
-
05-04-2021, 07:56 AM #86
People have been in lockdowns, masked, washing their hands 50 times a day, keeping their kids from socializing in person for over a year because they are trying to avoid the virus (and thus its long term effects)...that is an indication of how much they give a shyt about the effects of the virus. That is far, far away from willfully getting something injected into them which may have the same or even worse long term effects. There is a huge difference between being cautious and being stupid, and people have every right to show reasonable hesitation over something with no long term study available.
The keep calling this a vaccine and saying it's just like any other vaccine, why are you so dumb? The reality is that this is an injection unlike any other that has been used on humans before, with components that have never been used on humans before. They are likening it to a vaccine by calling it one in order to provide association and acceptance, when it does not function like one, it is something different and questioning it should not be met with ridicule.
-
05-04-2021, 08:08 AM #87
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 7,556
- Rep Power: 50145
Everything you said applies equally to the vaccine as it does to covid...
Most people who get the vaccine are fine and suffer mild symptoms, we know this. It's probably safe to assume the same applies to the unknown long term side effects.
Regarding the mRNA vaccines: we obviously do not understand everything there is but we've seen it the past year and have been studying it extensively and everything about it seems to be completely safe. But even so, the J&J vaccine is nothing new, are you ok with that one?Never neg first but always neg back crew
-
05-04-2021, 09:02 AM #88
-
-
05-04-2021, 09:05 AM #89
-
05-04-2021, 09:28 AM #90
I don't understand why some of you are posting negative things about me that don't directly address the points I am making. I've even been negged with seemingly no justification. I come to this section like once a month and am constantly reminded how hard it is to have actual useful discussions.
To those of you who were respectful with questions/comments, thank you. For the rest of you, you all win, I'm out.My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
Bookmarks