Wow you're talking about stuff you know nothing about. I know options a lot better than you as I've spent my career on wall street. They were likely exercised because the contracts were expiring and they were in the money. Politicians and their families report their trades because of this very specific reason - that's why you know about these trades. Politicians and their spouses report their brokerage statements (just like I am required to do) to avoid insider trading conflicts. They wouldn't have reported it if it wasn't legal. They would have instead did it through a brokerage account that wasn't monitored.
|
-
04-14-2021, 10:17 AM #31YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
-
04-14-2021, 10:33 AM #32
Of course they do. That's like asking if people on wall street engage in insider trading - the answer is yes, every day. However, I don't label something as insider trading when there is no evidence of it. I don't even know when those call options were even purchased and what the trading history on them is. But if there was something nefarious there, I highly doubt they would have reported the trade. Like I said, those trades are reported specifically to prevent insider trading.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
-
-
04-14-2021, 10:36 AM #33
-
04-14-2021, 10:42 AM #34
-
04-14-2021, 10:45 AM #35
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 20,334
- Rep Power: 229487
"Likely" "Probably" "Likely" "Probably"
"I know options better than you do bc wall street."
lmfao. Amazing. So how do you feel about politicians now? Pelosi's family shouldnt be making trades like this.
Exhibit C. A thread supposed to bring us common folk together against the elitist politicians and youre here arguing. "Probably." Sheep.USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
-
04-14-2021, 10:53 AM #36
-
-
04-14-2021, 10:54 AM #37
You shouldn't jump to conclusions that you have no evidence to support. It's very hard to bring people together on something like that. Pelosi's family... and any politicians family should be able to make those trades and follow the reporting guidelines exactly as they did as to be transparent about their trades and avoid any accusations of insider trading.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
-
04-14-2021, 10:56 AM #38
-
04-14-2021, 12:02 PM #39
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 20,334
- Rep Power: 229487
I know youre trying here seatard, but none of that matters to me so when I use them, they are interchangeable. It's because it doesn't matter. The Pelosi family and other politicians are the ones lining their pockets Thank you for continuing to babble about completely irrelevant issues like it matters what the hell I call Pelosi or the next politician that does it.
What facts did Audioslave present? He continuously says probably.. but I get it, you need to fight for your team. Here are the facts: Pelosi just made millions of dollars on something, she specifically, signed off on. Wake the fuk up.
^ Exhibit D.
Lmao.USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
-
04-14-2021, 12:21 PM #40
I admit it doesn't look good - that's a fair assessment. But I'm not going down this same rabbit hole that we went down when people claimed that Pelosi made millions of dollars on insider trading from briefings related to the COVID-19 virus, which ended up being completely false. The only reason people keep saying that they are profiting from insider information is because their trades are publicly disclosed and they made money. However, not knowing the entire trading history, the timelines, etc., makes this extremely hard to prove there was anything illegal here. I am not saying it is impossible for it to be illegal but I remember hearing this exact same story not too long ago and it was debunked.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
-
-
04-14-2021, 12:56 PM #41
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 23,728
- Rep Power: 268123
This. He probably bought the options a year prior when MSFT dipped to 159ish. I pity the bastard who took that bet, but fair play to Pelosi. I get that it looks bad, but he basically just bet a year ago that MSFT would recover from the covid apocalypse. Anyone looking at MSFT's price over the last year can see Pelosi would have bigly profited from exercising the options at any point since he purchased them.
It is illegal now but tough to prove that a congressman traded on insider info, so it still goes on. Not that there was any of that going on here. A very rich guy betting that MSFT would get bigger in a year is hardly indicative of insider trading.Heterologously Vaccinated Superior Race Crew
Kurt Russell, Ray Winstone, Mickey Rourke Crew
"The dominant economic order rests on unofficial dependency and official individualism. Survival requires the transposition of these two ideas: official solidarity and unofficial individualism."
-
04-14-2021, 01:26 PM #42
-
04-14-2021, 03:34 PM #43
-
04-14-2021, 03:38 PM #44
-
-
04-14-2021, 03:40 PM #45
-
04-14-2021, 03:44 PM #46
-
04-14-2021, 04:08 PM #47
-
04-14-2021, 04:10 PM #48
-
-
04-14-2021, 04:11 PM #49
-
04-14-2021, 04:14 PM #50
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 23,728
- Rep Power: 268123
-
04-14-2021, 04:18 PM #51
-
04-14-2021, 04:31 PM #52
-
-
04-14-2021, 08:34 PM #53
I think she’s a virtue signaling, fake, establishment politician, but I don’t see the issue with the stocks if there was no insider information used. Thats more the realm of the Republican senators that profited from their insider trading last year.
******Misc Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu crew******
Rawdog Crew
Neg bitter/self-hating FA threads/posts on sight
3x mod neg survivor
Bookmarks