Wiki Leaks Posts "Faked" Moon Landing Footage

[Paddington]

Wiki Leaks Posts "Faked" Moon Landing Footage


https://www.bitchute.com/video/hWvyo...rwt8tg-xp0zxxA

[brayar]

Believing in the moon landing is a good litmus test to see how brainwashed and slavish you are.

[fcrazy]

It was all fake, smh

[BuckNakedinBama]

"The owner has disabled comments on this video."

Unfortunate.

[ZeroPercentTip]

bitchute asking for $5.00 donation to keep this page up. Seems legit

[dabbmw2002]

sorry, that footage doesn't clarify anything. It that the evidence, weak sauce.

[Ironmanlet]

Watched the first two minutes.

Doesn’t show anything even close to debunking the moon landing. It just goes back and forth between showing some camera equipment, and then clips of the moon landing with some of type of director or whatever voice put over it. Most of the time what the director is saying has nothing to do with the scene being shown.


Does it get more interesting/believable after the first two minutes?

[fcrazy]

It was all a lie

[numberguy12]

Paddington (xfrodobagginsx) thinks the earth and universe are less than 10,000 years old; somehow I’m not surprised he thinks we didn’t land on the moon. His positions seem to be contra-science on almost any possible topic. I wouldn’t be surprised if he thinks the moon is a literal light in the sky and not a rocky place to land on.

[brayar]

Paddington (xfrodobagginsx) thinks the earth and universe are less than 10,000 years old; somehow I’m not surprised he thinks we didn’t land on the moon. His positions seem to be contra-science on almost any possible topic. I wouldn’t be surprised if he thinks the moon is a literal light in the sky and not a rocky place to land on.

I can't speak for him, but do know that the CIA promotes absurd conspiracy theories like "space is fake" or "the Earth is flat" to discredit people who challenge government narratives. They want to discredit all "conspiracy theorists" by saying that if you don't believe in the moon landing, you must believe that the Earth is flat.

The moon landing was fake. The Earth is not flat.

[numberguy12]

I can't speak for him, but do know that the CIA promotes absurd conspiracy theories like "space is fake" or "the Earth is flat" to discredit people who challenge government narratives. They want to discredit all "conspiracy theorists" by saying that if you don't believe in the moon landing, you must believe that the Earth is flat.

The moon landing was fake. The Earth is not flat.

Sorry, the evidence disagrees with you, but I’m not going to waste time rehashing it here.

Anyway, the reason I bring up the moon=light thing is because I wouldn’t be surprised if he did think this, considering his false views on other items of basic science (the age of the earth, evolution, Noah’s ark, etc), not to mention the Bible mentions the moon being a light in various passages (including the “lesser light” mentioned in Genesis), as this was the level of understanding of the ancient authors....and strict fundamentalists tend to defend anything the Bible says in literal fashion. But who knows. Either way, I’m not surprised he is skeptical of something in science that is well-evidenced. Not the first time.

[eod8989]

I can't believe people actually think we did a sci fi mission in the 60's

[Jasonw1178]

Not very convincing.

If the government was pulling some kind of hoax like that, they wouldn't just let someone walk around with a video camera. Plus it was the 1960's so they didn't have cell phone cameras. If you were videoing everyone knew.

[LtGoose]

Sounds like Wincel choking on a fat sausage

[brayar]

Sorry, the evidence disagrees with you, but I’m not going to waste time rehashing it here.

Anyway, the reason I bring up the moon=light thing is because I wouldn’t be surprised if he did think this, considering his false views on other items of basic science (the age of the earth, evolution, Noah’s ark, etc), not to mention the Bible mentions the moon being a light in various passages (including the “lesser light” mentioned in Genesis), as this was the level of understanding of the ancient authors....and strict fundamentalists tend to defend anything the Bible says in literal fashion. But who knows. Either way, I’m not surprised he is skeptical of something in science that is well-evidenced. Not the first time.

Science says that this spacecraft must reach 5,300 MPH to escape the moon's gravity. Does this launch look like something capable of reaching 5,300 MPH?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs

[Paul Kreul]

Read once where Kubrick was saying he helped film the fake landing & makes all sorts of references in The Shining in it. Whose Nose.

[Leonydus]

Yea we just brought over 1000s of german scientists and engineers to make a movie. Not to mention making 1000s of others involved to not reveal anything. The tracks can still be seen from aerial photos and the flagpole is still there. This along with flat earth morons make actual conspiracies less beleivable

[wincel]

I like American hero Buzz Aldrin's method for dealing with moon landing deniers, Trumpers, climate change deniers, covid deniers, etc.

[guest2021]

I wouldn't be surprised if they did fake the moon landing but more likely than not, they decided to create recreate the moon landing in case they encountered something in the moon.

I like the Buzz Aldrin method for dealing with moon landing deniers, Trumpers, climate change deniers, covid deniers, etc.

Buzz aldrin believes in aliens LMAO

[LukeLissen]

Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings is evidence, or analysis of evidence, about Moon landings that does not come from either NASA or the U.S. government (the first party), or the Apollo Moon landing hoax theorists (the second party). This evidence serves as independent confirmation of NASA's account of the Moon landings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-..._Moon_landings

cliffs: The third-party evidence and verification for the moon landings being real is extensive and incontrovertible.

[wincel]

Buzz aldrin believes in aliens LMAO

Source and clarification requested.

[ymer]

Watched the first two minutes.

Doesn’t show anything even close to debunking the moon landing. It just goes back and forth between showing some camera equipment, and then clips of the moon landing with some of type of director or whatever voice put over it. Most of the time what the director is saying has nothing to do with the scene being shown.


Does it get more interesting/believable after the first two minutes?

Hate to agree with this *******.

[Jasonw1178]

Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings is evidence, or analysis of evidence, about Moon landings that does not come from either NASA or the U.S. government (the first party), or the Apollo Moon landing hoax theorists (the second party). This evidence serves as independent confirmation of NASA's account of the Moon landings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-..._Moon_landings

cliffs: The third-party evidence and verification for the moon landings being real is extensive and incontrovertible.

Exactly.

If it were faked, the USSR would have been the first one's to call it out because they were watching, and they even confirmed.

[wincel]

This is just another sign of the cynical anti-scientific, anti-intellectual zeitgeist of our society. We are moving backwards. Society needs to kill stupid before stupid kills society.

[zyzzliftswjesus]

"Someone created a fake video showing the “fabrication” of the Apollo moon landings. It claims to be from Wikileaks, complete with its logo, a photo of Julian Assange, and various video effects for a semblance of authenticity. In reality, the video was taken from behind the scenes clips of the movie Capricorn One.

Wikileaks’ official website does not have the video, and the video is only available from dubious sources. It is not difficult to know the video is a blatant fake. However, flat-Earthers failed to recognize it is a fake, and the fake video spread in their communities as a hoax."

[Weightaholic]

I like American hero Buzz Aldrin's method for dealing with moon landing deniers, Trumpers, climate change deniers, covid deniers, etc.

Fcking Alpha.

[OptimistPrime11]

Watched the first two minutes.

Doesn’t show anything even close to debunking the moon landing. It just goes back and forth between showing some camera equipment, and then clips of the moon landing with some of type of director or whatever voice put over it. Most of the time what the director is saying has nothing to do with the scene being shown.


Does it get more interesting/believable after the first two minutes?

Well I can tell you that Stanley Kubrick, a very well know and respected director, did an interview about 17 years ago where he said that all of the moon landings were fake and that he directed them.

Why he would lie about that I have no idea so I tend to believe him. In addition he made sure that the interview wasn't released until 10 years after he was dead or something close to that.

[OptimistPrime11]

I like American hero Buzz Aldrin's method for dealing with moon landing deniers, Trumpers, climate change deniers, covid deniers, etc.

I used to work for a company in Los Angeles as a stock consultant where Buzz was a Board member. Met him a couple of times. Nice enough guy but a little on the kooky side.

[OptimistPrime11]

I can't believe people actually think we did a sci fi mission in the 60's

It does seem odd. From 1920 to 1960 was 40 years. We went from barely making a good automobile and a plane that could fly 100 miles to landing on the moon.....supposedly.

Yet from 1970 to 2020, where technology has advanced much much more....we have not been back to the moon?

Doesn't really add up.

[DukeOfWoodBerry]

Well I can tell you that Stanley Kubrick, a very well know and respected director, did an interview about 17 years ago where he said that all of the moon landings were fake and that he directed them.

Why he would lie about that I have no idea so I tend to believe him. In addition he made sure that the interview wasn't released until 10 years after he was dead or something close to that.

Ever seen Eyes Wide Shut? A movie about secret, elite socities where they perform occult rituals and human sacrifice. I don't think he came up with the idea from his imagination.