How ****ing retarded. Companies should have the autonomy to select who they want sitting on their board and not have some arbitrary rule that they have to have “Diverse” board members.
Further, this reeks of a move to “Stakeholder Capitalism”, where companies must have their boards as representatives of the community, rather than representatives of shareholders.
This ****, needs to end NOW!
Link: https://www.breitbart.com/economy/20...porate-boards/
|
-
12-01-2020, 05:14 PM #1
Nasdaq proposes that companies must have Diverse board members to be listed
-
12-01-2020, 05:16 PM #2
-
12-01-2020, 06:02 PM #3
It wouldn’t matter where the company is based. If they’re a publicly traded company that wants to be listed on NASDAQ, the company would need to comply with NASDAQ’s rules.
The company could try to be listed on the Dow or I guess, someone could create their own exchange, but the barriers to entry for that would be damn near impossible.
-
12-01-2020, 06:18 PM #4
-
-
12-01-2020, 06:24 PM #5
-
12-01-2020, 06:32 PM #6
-
12-01-2020, 06:41 PM #7
Here’s what the end goal is and it’s being done in incremental steps.
1. Force companies to have “diverse” people on their boards to be listed on the exchange through exchanges own rules.
2. Initiate propaganda how this is a good thing.
3. Start replacing board members to be more “diverse” until majority is reached.
4. Continue propaganda
5. Create laws that force companies to have diverse/community board members
6. Now that laws are created, their needs to be oversight. Governmental department now oversees the board and therefore the direction of the company.
7. Government controls means of production (communism)
Saul Alinsky wrote about overtaking corporate boards in order to control society. Kraus, is the main proponent of “stakeholder capitalism”, which is the finessed way of saying communism.
-
12-01-2020, 06:55 PM #8
-
-
12-01-2020, 06:57 PM #9
-
12-01-2020, 07:45 PM #10
-
12-01-2020, 07:50 PM #11
Fine. I'd hire a board of nothing but old white guys...then every board member self identifies as a gay black woman, because "diversity" really means "no straight white guys".
Then dare NASDAQ challenge them and say that you are not allowed to self identify as stuff.^^^()()GERMANIC CREW()()^^^
☆☆☆MISC BOXING CREW☆☆☆
☆☆☆SuperStraight cяєω☆☆☆
-
12-01-2020, 07:56 PM #12
-
-
12-01-2020, 08:01 PM #13
-
12-01-2020, 08:07 PM #14
-
12-01-2020, 08:25 PM #15
-
12-01-2020, 08:27 PM #16
-
-
12-01-2020, 08:32 PM #17
-
12-01-2020, 08:38 PM #18
-
12-01-2020, 08:43 PM #19
-
12-01-2020, 08:59 PM #20
This has been proposed a few times over the last 3-4 years I believe, although not specifically by the NASDAQ.
I believe the appropriate response is for some white board members to identify as non-white. Problem solved.Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
-
-
12-01-2020, 09:04 PM #21
-
12-01-2020, 09:05 PM #22
-
12-01-2020, 09:30 PM #23
-
12-01-2020, 09:45 PM #24
-
-
12-01-2020, 09:55 PM #25
-
12-01-2020, 10:02 PM #26
-
12-01-2020, 10:10 PM #27
-
12-01-2020, 10:11 PM #28
Short answer, technically yes, but clients don’t give a chit.
I’ve worked with construction companies that say “you know who I want to hire for this receptionist role. I need a nice woman who isn’t going to get pregnant and need mat leave anytime soon” and I’ve worked with tech startups that say “don’t publicize this, but we want to hire a black or LatinX candidate, preferably a woman”. You can’t technically make that a requirement, but guess who they’ll choose to interview..
And then you have sourcing tools like Hiretual that literally have diversity sourcing modules built into them.
Irritates the phuck out of me but I’m a merc so I do what I have to do to get paid.******Misc Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu crew******
Rawdog Crew
Neg bitter/self-hating FA threads/posts on sight
3x mod neg survivor
-
-
12-01-2020, 10:13 PM #29
-
12-01-2020, 10:15 PM #30
Bookmarks