Why aren't humans classified into subspecies?

[dabbmw2002]

The OP said SUBSPECIES not different species.

I was not responding to the OP. Check again.

[BK909]

Noticing that we aren’t all the same. That we have different traits and tendencies will get you cancelled in current year

Rather you believe everyone is the same species or everyone is different species one fact remains the same.
Black is the dominant species

[TheAdlerian]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies

A taxonomist decides whether to recognize a subspecies. A common criterion for recognizing two distinct populations as subspecies rather than full species is the ability of them to interbreed without a fitness penalty.[citation needed] In the wild, subspecies do not interbreed due to geographic isolation or sexual selection. The differences between subspecies are usually less distinct than the differences between species.

Fitness penalty would be something like sterility.

As indicated in this thread, humans do in fact have subspecies as all humans can breed without sterility but tend not to due to geographic location and many types of humans aren't sexually attracted to certain types of humans.

[TheAdlerian]

Rather you believe everyone is the same species or everyone is different species one fact remains the same.
Black is the dominant species

They are the least successful and least welcomed of all types of people.

Nowhere on the planet outside of Africa is there a large successful population of black people.

There is nothing "dominant" about black people. Their genes for color etc are more likely to express themselves due to it being a protective adaptation but calling genetic chemicals "dominant" is like a dramatized description. In addition, a person isn't "skin color" but rather a total machine. Their total machine literally doesn't do well anywhere.

[BK909]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies

A taxonomist decides whether to recognize a subspecies. A common criterion for recognizing two distinct populations as subspecies rather than full species is the ability of them to interbreed without a fitness penalty.[citation needed] In the wild, subspecies do not interbreed due to geographic isolation or sexual selection. The differences between subspecies are usually less distinct than the differences between species.

Fitness penalty would be something like sterility.

As indicated in this thread, humans do in fact have subspecies as all humans can breed without sterility but tend not to due to geographic location and many types of humans aren't sexually attracted to certain types of humans.

Technology has eliminated geographical barriers and men will poke anything when no one is looking.
Some of the so called greatest men to ever live slept with men and women they considered less than human and therefore property.

[FAPhaggot]

I also generally do not find gingers attractive either.

Awesome. More for me.

[TheAdlerian]

Technology has eliminated geographical barriers and men will poke anything when no one is looking.
Some of the so called greatest men to ever live slept with men and women they considered less than human and therefore property.

That's not true.

Only rich people are going to different areas of the world and only narcissist types, rich people, are going to sleep with people they don't care about and aren't really attracted to.

If it wasn't for TV we would know next to nothing about Africa, Asia, etc let alone actually go there.

In keeping with other themes, next to no white people wants to go to Africa and certainly they don't want to live there. If they did go, it wouldn't be for culture, it would be to see animals, not the people, food, etc.

[iloveus]

I also generally do not find gingers attractive either.

[BK909]

That's not true.

Only rich people are going to different areas of the world and only narcissist types, rich people, are going to sleep with people they don't care about and aren't really attracted to.

If it wasn't for TV we would know next to nothing about Africa, Asia, etc let alone actually go there.

In keeping with other themes, next to no white people wants to go to Africa and certainly they don't want to live there. If they did go, it wouldn't be for culture, it would be to see animals, not the people, food, etc.

I believe that you believe that.

[PenorBrahNoHomo]

There is no legitimate answer OP, other than 'that's racist'. Literally everything is politicised now by the left.

[BK909]

-Has to create alternate accounts to speak freely

-Dominant

Pick one...

[moosik85]

There is no legitimate answer OP, other than 'that's racist'. Literally everything is politicised now by the left.

Yep. There used to be very in depth studies about the difference between human traits, iq, behaviours etc until the left took over our cultural and learning institutions.

Now even voicing that some people have a higher chance of certain behaviours and traits will get you cancelled. We would be far better off as a society if we realised that not everyone is equal and guided them into career/life paths that suited their abilities.

[HannoCometh]

Lol @ thinking pigmy Africans and aboriginals are the same as Nords and ashkenazi Jews

I think if experimentation is done on the endocrine systems of Africans and Aboriginals, we could succeed in making them bigger, stronger and taller (but such experimentation is more effective when started from birth/the womb/or in genetic engineering). I'm sure it's just a biological issue. There is no God, just evolution and biology and through technology, new knowledge and procedures, we can usually bypass natural biology.

[HannoCometh]

That's not true.

Only rich people are going to different areas of the world and only narcissist types, rich people, are going to sleep with people they don't care about and aren't really attracted to.

If it wasn't for TV we would know next to nothing about Africa, Asia, etc let alone actually go there.

In keeping with other themes, next to no white people wants to go to Africa and certainly they don't want to live there. If they did go, it wouldn't be for culture, it would be to see animals, not the people, food, etc.

Unfortunately, you're wrong there.

If it wasn't for the media, the UN, "international pressure and awareness", sense of morality etc the indigenous continentals in Africa would have been pushed into the sea and the resources on the continent would be freely plundered without having to worry about indigenous governments/civilians "blocking" the way (for example, certain rare earth minerals which are present in smartphones, games consoles, computers, laptops etc are widely available in certain parts of Africa)

[DavidEaslea]

A realistic answer is this:

If your dog was still a basic dog, but he understood English, and you told him that you don't love him.

That's why society doesn't talk about this subject any longer.

You mentioned Neanderthals and that situations has never stopped.

Back then there were different types of humans living on the same planet, and we have the same situation now.

The reality is that we have "cave people" type humans that are still alive, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. It does no good to complain about it and if you do, it just creates hurt feelings in the cave people and non cave people.

It's a no win situation dealing with this topic.

It's like I said about the dog.

Hey I tried to PM you but your inbox is full.

[InfoSuperHwy]

You definitely aren't superior to anything if this low-effort bait thread is the best you can do.

I'm black.

[PenorBrahNoHomo]

Lol @ thinking pigmy Africans and aboriginals are the same as Nords and ashkenazi Jews

This is a good way of framing it.

[HannoCometh]

A realistic answer is this:

If your dog was still a basic dog, but he understood English, and you told him that you don't love him.

That's why society doesn't talk about this subject any longer.

You mentioned Neanderthals and that situations has never stopped.

Back then there were different types of humans living on the same planet, and we have the same situation now.

The reality is that we have "cave people" type humans that are still alive, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. It does no good to complain about it and if you do, it just creates hurt feelings in the cave people and non cave people.

It's a no win situation dealing with this topic.

It's like I said about the dog.

Who exactly are these "cave people"? Are you seriously calling white people "cave people" because of the small percentage of Neanderthal DNA? (Incidentally, Neanderthal DNA is also responsible for a wider nose amongst other things)

[JuicedMayhem]

I don’t know what you guys are talking about. There already classified into subspecies. White, black, latino and Chinese

[InfoSuperHwy]

...and a jew.

[LegDayLol]

Oh lawd lol

Modern views of subspecies is about genetic variation, not phenotype.

[HannoCometh]

I don’t know what you guys are talking about. There already classified into subspecies. White, black, latino and Chinese

The OP was actually being derogatory/supremacist
I actually initially thought he was on about subclassifications like in mathematics (e.g. calculus, mechanics, geometry, algebra etc)

[PenorBrahNoHomo]

Yep. There used to be very in depth studies about the difference between human traits, iq, behaviours etc until the left took over our cultural and learning institutions.

Now even voicing that some people have a higher chance of certain behaviours and traits will get you cancelled. We would be far better off as a society if we realised that not everyone is equal and guided them into career/life paths that suited their abilities.

It's since Boasian anthropology gained prominence. There is a certain group who push phenomenological and biological equality while believing themselves to be superior and trying to maintain their own racial 'purity'.

[Hutrapper]

wow , and you consider yourself superior to what? a pile of feces probably has a higher iq then you.

Ya, but he has that nifty chart.

[TheAdlerian]

Hey I tried to PM you but your inbox is full.

Sorry, I will clear it.

[TheAdlerian]

Who exactly are these "cave people"? Are you seriously calling white people "cave people" because of the small percentage of Neanderthal DNA? (Incidentally, Neanderthal DNA is also responsible for a wider nose amongst other things)

If you actually read about Neanderthals they had larger brains that standard humans.

The people who are cave people are the people living around us from Africa and extremely primitive places. They are people who literally developed nothing, barely have languages, and invented nothing. They are literal cave people that far smarter people have living with them in the same community and yet they believe, based on no evidence, that they are the same type of human.

[TheAdlerian]

I don’t know what you guys are talking about. There already classified into subspecies. White, black, latino and Chinese

Latino isn't a subspecies as they are a recent "breed" or mixture of people.

They have only been around a couple hundred years and didn't occur naturally.

[TheAdlerian]

Oh lawd lol

Modern views of subspecies is about genetic variation, not phenotype.

The literal definition is about phenotype.

Also, phenotype is based on genetics, so it's as if you don't know what you're talking about, lol.

[Leonydus]

-Has to create alternate accounts to speak freely

-Dominate

Pick one...

Christopher Langan, the man with one of the highest IQ's in the world was banned from ******** for this post:

imagine

[PermaNoob]

Das raycis