We’re supposed to believe Biden:
1. Beat Obama by 11 million but won 400 less counties
2. Outperformed Clinton in only 4 major cities ( Detroit, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Philadelphia)
3. Democrats lost 29/29 “close” house races
Buckle up ladies and gentlemen. This shall not stand.
|
Thread: Can liberals explain this?
-
11-26-2020, 12:48 PM #1
-
11-26-2020, 12:55 PM #2
-
11-26-2020, 01:05 PM #3
-
11-26-2020, 01:06 PM #4
-
11-26-2020, 01:08 PM #5
-
11-26-2020, 01:09 PM #6
Do not get your hopes up on Trump staying in office. I'm thinking at best we see some Governors go to jail and a re haul of the entire voting system. Even if Trump flips PA and GA he still loses. He would need a faithless elector to go against the people. Which is possible, but its like a 3% possibility rate.
I was always looking at the finger pointing at
the moon. Now I'm just looking at the moon.
And theres no me looking. Theres just looking.
-
11-26-2020, 01:09 PM #7
-
11-26-2020, 01:35 PM #8
Do you honestly think that if fraud is proven and GA and PA flip, that the rest of the country will just go "ohh, ya, dems only cheated in those two states and everything else was legit... Biden is still our president" or do you think even 1-2 states flipping will cause a massive chit storm never seen in the history of US politics? at that point, the whole election would be called into question.
W moich zylach plynie Polska krew.
-
11-26-2020, 01:41 PM #9
It depends on how they flip. If MASS fraud is proven without a doubt then yes, if it flips or gets voided because the Governor didn't follow his own election laws, no. And the key thing is there is almost no way to prove mass fraud. the only evidence you could use is automatically tossed and tore up never to be seen again.
I was always looking at the finger pointing at
the moon. Now I'm just looking at the moon.
And theres no me looking. Theres just looking.
-
11-26-2020, 02:06 PM #10
-
11-26-2020, 02:07 PM #11
-
11-26-2020, 02:09 PM #12
-
11-26-2020, 02:22 PM #13
-
11-26-2020, 02:28 PM #14
-
11-26-2020, 02:30 PM #15
-
11-26-2020, 02:38 PM #16
They accuse of the left being in an echo chamber while they live in the biggest echo chamber of all. This echo chamber convinced them that "owning the libs" is not only a winning strategy, but such a winning strategy that it couldn't possibly lose and if it did that means fraud happened.
Can't believe 2020 actually managed to sort of redeem itself with a holiday season that will be filled with millions of REEEEEing Trumpers. Gonna be a beautiful 2 more months
-
11-26-2020, 02:45 PM #17
Right? Ignoring Trump's policies (which he had none), his 2020 campaign was so awful I can't believe they defend it. I mean, why do they expect Trump to win when he is so damn lazy? The fact he showed up so unprepared and out of it in the first debate is mind boggling. How can Trumpers defend that with a straight face?
Trump should've known what he was up against. He should have spent every second of his campaign winning over voters. Instead he doubled down on his rhetoric and lost due to it.
A good example of this is his answer to the SCOTUS question in the first debate. He said "Elections have consequences" (the famous Obama quote). Okay, that's fine to say to political opponents or haters in the media.... it is NOT okay to say that in front of 75 million voters. But Trump and his supporters don't understand that. They view it as "triggering da libz!!!!11" (but of course, if you even dare criticize them, they melt like the snowflakes they are).Two Scoops
One Term
Zero Wall
-
11-26-2020, 02:55 PM #18
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 21,190
- Rep Power: 200712
-
11-26-2020, 03:33 PM #19
-
11-26-2020, 03:34 PM #20
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
- Posts: 21,190
- Rep Power: 200712
-
11-26-2020, 05:21 PM #21
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
- Posts: 57,969
- Rep Power: 159779
-
11-26-2020, 06:07 PM #22
4. Record number of blacks and hispanics voted for Trump despite a 4 year long media smear campaign.
5. Massively insecure non open source voting machines and software.
6. Hundreds of witness testimony regarding shady business at voting locations.
7. "Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date."
I think Giuliani is correct in his logic that the people orchestrating the fraud thought (based on polling data) that they'd only have to bullchit a few ballots here and there. When they realized their numbers were wrong again just as they were in 2016 they scrambled, suspended the count, and ramped up the fraud. Which is why you see such irregularities in the data.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius
?start=(#seconds)
TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
-
11-26-2020, 06:10 PM #23
-
11-26-2020, 06:10 PM #24
-
11-26-2020, 06:17 PM #25
All over the MSM you hear "no evidence blah blah blah".
Okay... then what is sufficient evidence?
One fraudulent ballot? Two? Three? One hundred? A thousand? Tens of thousands? Complete lack of transparency in the process?
I'm actually mind-blown that people have such a low approval rating of their government and believe it is corrupt ... and then within .0005 seconds they'll just dismiss the notion of massive voter fraud in the USA as impossible. Which is even more laughable when you consider what they did to Bernie Sanders vs Hillary ... and how they pushed the disproven Russian narrative for 4 years. The lack of consistency in that logic is simply amazing."There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius
?start=(#seconds)
TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
-
11-26-2020, 06:28 PM #26
-
11-26-2020, 06:28 PM #27
-
11-26-2020, 06:28 PM #28
I spent over a decade doing IT work. Your average person is a computer and electronics moron. I can't tell you the number of times I watched people place paper in a printer incorrectly despite there being big red "DONT PUT PAPER HERE" symbols. Zero chance these people running the count operate the machines with any reasonable efficiency. Furthermore, we were constantly fixing industrial duty cycle printers/scanners due to improper usage and worn out parts. No fkn way those machines operate even close to their stated conservative estimates.
My biggest issue with all this is how terribly insecure all the tech is and the process itself. Good luck verifying your vote from beginning to end. The amount of trust people and the media blindly put into this tech is frightening .... more so when you consider how ignorant 90% of people are with regards to technology."There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius
?start=(#seconds)
TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
-
11-26-2020, 06:32 PM #29
Where is your evidence for this mass hatred for Trump? If that were the case, then why have there been massive shifts in the hispanic and black communities in favor of him? Outside the MSM and all over the internet I see overwhelming support for Trump. Even the polling data was mostly BS. What supports your claim other than the already debunked MSM?
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius
?start=(#seconds)
TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
-
11-26-2020, 06:33 PM #30
Bear in mind that the legal system isn't Aristotelian logic. Eyewitness testimony is evidence that meets burden of proof.
As an example, if 50 people saw Jack murdering someone, or saw him cleaning a bloody knife, or testify that they saw him disposing of bloody clothes...that's evidence that will be taken as proof in the court of law. You don't need video evidence in criminal court and this is currently a civil case.
Bookmarks