*🇱🇷*🇱🇷* Election Chat Thread III: The land of Cope and Dreams *🇱🇷*🇱🇷*🇱🇷

[ViolentZ]

https://ip2always.win/p/11QRtgGh2B/t...t-president/c/

[Titansfan08]

Drumpf in peached yet?

[JoshSP1985]

She offered access to their most senior health officials... what kind of retarded article is this? How would NZ health officials have any idea how to control the scale of the virus in the US?

It's just propaganda reinforcing the narrative that the Trump team didn't know what they were doing and Biden is going to save the day by "listening to the scientists" like he says every time he's asked a question.

[digital022]

Drumpf in peached yet?

Yeah breh, we collectively told him to gtfo

The people have spoken. It's a beautiful thing.

[Jatt24]

She offered access to their most senior health officials... what kind of retarded article is this? How would NZ health officials have any idea how to control the scale of the virus in the US?

He could have a meeting with Africa on how to get rid of starvation in the USA and the media would praise him.

[5x10]

She offered access to their most senior health officials... what kind of retarded article is this? How would NZ health officials have any idea how to control the scale of the virus in the US?

hey, it feels good

That’s what it’s all about

[Procta]

Jay / Jordan Sekulow .... another tease of something coming for GA

https://twitter.com/KelemenCari/stat...63809909714945

[|ceman]

Jay / Jordan Sekulow .... another tease of something coming for GA

https://twitter.com/KelemenCari/stat...63809909714945

[XterraRob]

Accurate.

[ItsJamesthefin]

Jay / Jordan Sekulow .... another tease of something coming for GA

https://twitter.com/KelemenCari/stat...63809909714945

Hopefully after this week all the cards are on the table and we don't have this constant it's coming.

[Lord_Lemon]

Jay / Jordan Sekulow .... another tease of something coming for GA

https://twitter.com/KelemenCari/stat...63809909714945

[GreatOldOne]

What’s gotten lost in all of the focus on President Trump’s lawsuits, his baseless accusations of voter fraud and his administration’s unwillingness so far to begin the transition is a simple fact.

The 2020 presidential election wasn’t really that close.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1248608

Right now, Joe Biden’s popular-vote lead over Trump stands at 4 percentage points, 51 percent to 47 percent — and it’s only going to grow once more of New York’s votes (finally) get counted.

That would give Biden the second-largest popular vote margin out of the 21st century’s six presidential elections, with only Barack Obama’s 7-point win in 2008 being greater.

[XterraRob]

What’s gotten lost in all of the focus on President Trump’s lawsuits, his baseless accusations of voter fraud and his administration’s unwillingness so far to begin the transition is a simple fact.

The 2020 presidential election wasn’t really that close.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1248608

Right now, Joe Biden’s popular-vote lead over Trump stands at 4 percentage points, 51 percent to 47 percent — and it’s only going to grow once more of New York’s votes (finally) get counted.

That would give Biden the second-largest popular vote margin out of the 21st century’s six presidential elections, with only Barack Obama’s 7-point win in 2008 being greater.

Do you feel Bellwether counties are no longer a correlating metric?

[JoshSP1985]

Do you feel Bellwether counties are no longer a correlating metric?

Pretty impressive to win the vote by so much yet lose almost every bellwether county. Counties that were nearly 100% Accurate going back 6 elections and were 100% accurate for more than one of those.

[GreatOldOne]

Do you feel Bellwether counties are no longer a correlating metric?

By what mechanism would a "bellwether county" represent other counties, or a state?

[|ceman]

Pretty impressive to win the vote by so much yet lose almost every bellwether county. Counties that were nearly 100% Accurate going back 6 elections and were 100% accurate for more than one of those.

Bellwethers change.

For over 35 years from 1952 to 1988 California voted Republican every year except one. For the last 30+ years, whoever won Ohio won the presidency. Times, demographics, redistricting, etc all change voting patterns.

[NuggzTheNinja]

Bellwethers change.

For over 35 years from 1952 to 1988 California voted Republican every year except one. For the last 30+ years, whoever won Ohio won the presidency. Times, demographics, redistricting, fraud, etc all change voting patterns.

Fixed that for ya kiddo.

In other news...

[XterraRob]

By what mechanism would a "bellwether county" represent other counties, or a state?

Bellwethers change.

For over 35 years from 1952 to 1988 California voted Republican every year except one. For the last 30+ years, whoever won Ohio won the presidency. Times, demographics, redistricting, etc all change voting patterns.

From wikipedia, emphasis in Bold:

Election bellwether counties in the United States are counties that vote in alignment with the country as a whole in United States presidential elections, so that the county votes for the candidate who ultimately wins the election. The strongest bellwether counties are those that back the winning candidate in all, or almost all, elections. There are a total of 3,141 counties or county equivalents in the United States. In the 2020 presidential election, almost all counties previously considered reliable indicators of eventual success in the election did not continue their streaks as bellwethers, voting for Donald Trump as opposed to the projected winner of the election, Joe Biden; this was attributed to increasing political polarization throughout the country.

[|ceman]

Fixed that for ya kiddo.

As per all of the claims of fraud, they only exist on social media on the internet and are NEVER brought up in court with any substantiating evidence.

There's fraud going on all right....just not what you think nor by who you think.

[metroins]

Fixed that for ya kiddo.

In other news...

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnhecLxWEAMSNCY?format=jpg&name=900x900[/imfg]

The Democrats are requesting Giuliani not be allowed to "narrowly" appeal the motion to leave and are requesting a clarification of full appeal.

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-c...1/Document.pdf

This is an untenable proposal. The partial-appeal procedure proposed by
Appellants is contrary to “the historic federal policy against piecemeal appeals.”
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 351 U.S. 427, 438 (1956). This proposed
procedure further runs counter to the final judgment rule, codified by 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, which requires “that a party must ordinarily raise all claims of error in a
single appeal following final judgment on the merits.” Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 374 (1981). Moreover, it is well established that
“arguments not raised in an appellant’s opening brief are deemed waived.” United
States v. Quillen, 335 F. 3d 219, 224 (3d Cir. 2003) (citing Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie,
239 F.3d 307, 316 n.2 (3d. Cir. 2001) (en banc)); see also Fed. R. App. P. 28 (a)(8)
(requirements for Appellants’ brief).


This is not to ignore other flaws in the piecemeal process proposed by
Appellants, including the inefficiency of the proposal in light of Appellants’ claimed
exigencies, the apparent gamesmanship in attempting to either avoid or somehow
defer review of the merits of the District Court’s November 21, 2020 order—which
are intimately bound in the denial of leave to amend—and bedrock preclusion
principles. See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 109 (2d Cir. 1981) (Friendly, J.)
(Driven by considerations of fairness to the parties, judicial economy, and the
societal interest in finality, the law-of-the-case doctrine “applies . . . to everything
decided by necessary implication in the first appeal.”).

In light of these well-established principles, Appellee Counties ask this Court
to clarify its November 23, 2020 Order granting the amended motion to expedite to
make clear that Appellants’ brief must cover all issues relevant to this appeal and
that the normal waiver and preclusion doctrines and prohibitions on piecemeal
litigation will apply.

[GreatOldOne]

From wikipedia, emphasis in Bold:

That's not an explanation, though.

I've always seen the idea as magical thinking. That is, unless the idea is simply that certain counties have the highest population.

Edit: Given the number of counties in the US, there's probably bound to be bellwether counties as a matter of course...until, well, they are eventually wrong which would also be bound as a matter of course.

[metroins]

Also the PA Supreme Court reversed one of Trumps wins....

Spoiler!

-- Trump was supposed to file his brief to the third circuit court of appeals at 4:00pm; it is late.

[Procta]

https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...ign=newsletter

[|ceman]

Also the PA Supreme Court reversed one of Trumps wins....

Ouch!

1 for 35 is like Washington Generals kind of winning.

https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...ign=newsletter

How many times have you guys posted something from twitter claiming it was a huge win only to have it counted as a loss in court? Surely this time they will win in court. Surely.

[Procta]

intredesting thread on GA

https://twitter.com/SelimSeesYou/sta...12283443290115

[XterraRob]

That's not an explanation, though.

I've always seen the idea as magical thinking. That is, unless the idea is simply that certain counties have the highest population.

Edit: Given the number of counties in the US, there's probably bound to be bellwether counties as a matter of course...until, well, they are eventually wrong which would also be bound as a matter of course.

I asked if you felt Bellwether counties were no longer a correlating metric, you asked about a mechanism of representation of what, and the wikipedia paragraph I quoted explained that bellwether counties are essentially a weather-vane for who would win the Presidency in a given election year. Not sure what else you wanted out of that... but thank you for taking the time to answer my original question.

intredesting thread on GA

https://twitter.com/SelimSeesYou/sta...12283443290115

The GA Ballots as of today are not auditable anymore, correct?

[metroins]

I asked if you felt Bellwether counties were no longer a correlating metric, you asked about a mechanism of representation of what, and the wikipedia paragraph I quoted explained that bellwether counties are essentially a weather-vane for who would win the Presidency in a given election year. Not sure what else you wanted out of that... but thank you for taking the time to answer my original question.



The GA Ballots as of today are not auditable anymore, correct?

Trump requested a machine recount; they can still be audited again I think.

[XterraRob]

Trump requested a machine recount; they can still be audited again I think.

But no formal audit in the sense of signature confirmation?

[Committed2Crime]

Anthony Weiner laptop
Hillary Emails
Hunter laptop
Russia Hoax
Impeachment Hoax
Brett Kavanaugh Hoax
Steel Dossier Hoax
Ukraine Hoax
Michael Flynn Hoax
Fake whistle blowers
Covid Hoax/excuse to control

Head of FBI and CIA clearly deep state

No democrats ever being held accountable

The murder of Epstein

Joe Biden being the worst candidate of all time yet magically getting 80 million votes, shattering all records

The radicalization of the demo party

The media/social media clearly against Trump instead of objective reporting

Overwhelming shady connections with democrats, radicals, and dominion


How could anyone be confident the demos did not cheat? Why would you not want this looked in to?

Why would you want an ilegally elected international criminal for president?

Is it just about trolling? Winning at any cost? Anyone but Trump because fake news and celebrities say so?

why are all of the people trump knows locked up?

[John Promise]

[img]https://i.ibb.co/qrDmNFN/pasup.png
[/img]

Fake?

Blue checks are required to use pictures of their faces for their avis.