Muesli typically contains oats and dried fruit tho, correct? Even then, honey is a very concentrated sugary carb, and if you pair that with the low volume of the muesli (and whatever milk you might add to it) and the added fats and starches, it makes sense it would be easy to consume high amounts of.
I think Strawng is talking about whole-food carbs which aren't high in sugar (other than fruit which is also fairly difficult to over eat alone) such as potato, rice, quinoa, oatmeal, etc... items which require some kind of added seasoning or flavors to become easier to over-consume.
|
Thread: Steaks everyday
-
09-01-2020, 07:41 AM #31
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Posts: 26,949
- Rep Power: 137131
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
-
09-01-2020, 07:48 AM #32
I also use muesli without dried fruit. With oat milk which is low fat. So no added fat.
As I said, I wouldn't have any trouble smashing plain white rice either. I'm not in jail though so I won't have too.
I might look up some research on the satiety of plain white rice. I expect it's very low.Last edited by Mrpb; 09-01-2020 at 08:13 AM.
-
-
09-01-2020, 07:56 AM #33
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Posts: 26,949
- Rep Power: 137131
-
09-01-2020, 08:02 AM #34
-
09-01-2020, 08:13 AM #35
-
09-01-2020, 08:16 AM #36
-
-
09-01-2020, 08:24 AM #37
-
09-01-2020, 09:46 AM #38
-
09-01-2020, 09:49 AM #39
-
09-01-2020, 10:38 AM #40
That was my whole point. I didn’t mean I couldn’t eat a lot of plain white rice. I meant I couldn’t see a human being in today’s world eating remotely intuitively & getting overweight or obese from plain carbs because they’re not very palatable. They need simple sugars or fats to go with them. I’m talking about palatability, not satiety. FFS people love debating minutia on here. I never once claimed rice satiating. I claimed it was not obesogenic because it’s so boring plain. Add fat, simple sugar, or excess sodium and it’s a different story.
-
-
09-01-2020, 10:50 AM #41
-
09-01-2020, 10:50 AM #42
-
09-01-2020, 11:24 AM #43
Yeah, that seems like a little bit of an overreaction. He made a universal claim, you demonstrate an exception even while agreeing generally, and then it suddenly becomes, "for ****'s sake," a debate about minutiae.
This is a nutrition forum. What else is the point?
You only just now mentioned simple sugars instead of fats. You started out saying that carbs, to use your words even the simplest, are almost always hard to go overboard with by themselves, yet now you're specifying simple carbs as an exception to this, and also to be fair you did just start a thread arguing that people who prefer them tend to be leaner anyway, as though even simple sugars really aren't that bad on the whole.
I have to agree with what you're saying about fats, it's just that it's pretty clear that you're "team carb" and didn't want to admit that there was an exception with them.Bench: 350
Squat: 405
Deadlift: 505
"... But always, there remained, the discipline of steel!"
-
09-01-2020, 11:31 AM #44
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Posts: 26,949
- Rep Power: 137131
How about this:
Refined sugars make food easier to overeat
Refined oils/fats make food easier to overeat
Salt/seasonings make food easier to overeat
The less intense a flavor is, and the less added, concentrated, refined oil, fat, or sugar is added, the less likely it is to cause over-consumption"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
-
-
09-01-2020, 11:41 AM #45
I guess you mean they increase palatability?
If so, it's close but I don't even think the oil and sugars need to be refined. Mango sticky rice being a good example. They drizzle coconut milk over it. The sugars in mango aren't refined.
Adding raisins to muesli also increases palatability.Last edited by Mrpb; 09-01-2020 at 11:50 AM.
-
09-01-2020, 11:55 AM #46
-
09-01-2020, 11:59 AM #47
-
09-01-2020, 12:03 PM #48
-
-
09-01-2020, 12:38 PM #49
I’m not “team carb”, I was making a point against being “anti carb”. I was trying to articulate the idea that demonizing “fats” or “carbs” is shortsighted because the main issue with regards to excess fat gain is the hyperpalatable combination of the two & processed foods in general. People ain’t fat because of white rice & they ain’t fat because of steak. I would waste away if all I ate were fats. Keto works for plenty of people. I obviously failed to articulate my point.
-
09-01-2020, 12:49 PM #50
-
09-01-2020, 12:55 PM #51
-
09-01-2020, 04:56 PM #52
it always goes south with these posts. This forum is basically for the "I can't lose fat" newbies. These newer members read these posts and just go "F it" I'll stay fat if this is an indication of what it takes to get leaner. And weren't we talking about steak?
If you don't get what you want you didn't want it bad enough
Pro Choice
Non Christian
MAGA
2A Advocate
FJB
-
-
09-01-2020, 05:22 PM #53
-
09-01-2020, 05:35 PM #54
-
09-01-2020, 05:37 PM #55
-
09-01-2020, 05:50 PM #56
-
-
09-01-2020, 06:16 PM #57
-
09-01-2020, 06:34 PM #58
Except that's not how this conversation transpired at all lol? Nobody who disagreed was trying to make an allowance for anything, and in fact the point of contention was that fat isn't the only thing to blame in this otherwise endless plain carb spree.
You say this forum is for newbies who can't lose fat. This may be somewhat confrontational, but nevertheless fair to say if you're going to disparage those asking questions about this as attempting to avoid improvement without addressing what they're saying, how many of you elites have managed to become lean at a weight above 200 pounds? Probably no one who has posted in this thread and precious few on this forum overall.
Being shredded at all is impressive and worthy of respect, but what about the other half of the so-called "body building" game where you're trying to build a bigger frame than a high schooler? I would hope no one goes around calling people newbies for failing to achieve that after several years. I certainly wouldn't.Bench: 350
Squat: 405
Deadlift: 505
"... But always, there remained, the discipline of steel!"
-
09-01-2020, 07:10 PM #59
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Posts: 26,949
- Rep Power: 137131
-
09-01-2020, 07:32 PM #60
This. Since everyone's still arguing bullchit in this thread, a man of average height (5 foot 10 here in the USA) at a very reasonably lean 13% body fat would have a FFMI of over 25. This is generally considered the natty limit, so few if any people would ever achieve these stats even with the best possible genetics/nutrition/training. Also, regardless, being big and lean does not an expert make. I'd much rather take my nutrition advice from Alan Aragon, Eric Helms, Brad Schoenfeld, & other experts in the field of natural bodybuilding and nutrition than IFBB pro Ronnie "I was 0.3% body fat" Coleman any day even though they all fail to reach the fabled 200 lb mark. Your physique =/= your knowledge of fitness.
Bookmarks