|
-
03-14-2020, 02:49 AM #91
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 20,553
- Rep Power: 394791
By reading this post you acknowledge r32gojirra is an online persona and all posts by r32gojirra are satirical in nature. Comments by r32gojirra shall not reflect on the integrity and morals of the author portraying the online character nor any professional or contractual affiliates of the author.
AP4C
HTC
Repped by kimm into 200kcrew crew
-
03-14-2020, 02:57 AM #92
-
-
03-14-2020, 03:16 AM #93
-
03-14-2020, 05:01 AM #94
Well the demographics on most of these cars are around 50/50 some are more purchased by one gender than the other but not a huge gap in most cases (unless it's like a Lamborghini or something). Women do most of the spending in general but the man does most of the earning so alienating a large part of your audience generally isn't a good move. We can see this due to the fact that women and men are complaining about the commercial and Nissan disabled comments.
On a pragmatic business scale it keeps flopping. Charlie's Angels (aimed at women presumably), Bird's of Prey (also aimed at women), this commercial, Gillette commercial. These just end up flopping hard because most people are tired of having ideology rammed into every video whether it's hardcore or more subtle (like this video was if you didn't see the behind the scenes part).
-
03-14-2020, 05:08 AM #95
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Posts: 18,231
- Rep Power: 45398
I hope BMW doesnt do this...only brand i respek
F*ck Joe Biden
"Your problem is you spent your whole life thinking there are rules. There aren't. We used to be gorillas. All we had is what we could take and defend." - Lorne Malvo
“I'll do anything usually if there's money involved and little work.” — Daniel Tosh
Chef Crew | NYC Crew | Knee Draggers Crew | Wristwatch Crew
-
03-14-2020, 05:24 AM #96
-
-
03-14-2020, 05:33 AM #97
-
03-14-2020, 05:57 AM #98
-
03-14-2020, 06:06 AM #99
I've heard their CVT's have more issues lately and have gone downhill since they merged with Renault. I have a much older model but I'm certainly going to look somewhere else now.
They don't call it the world's oldest profession for nothing. It will always exist in some form or another.
What often ends up happening is that the like/dislike ratio will magically change overnight. People have accused Gillette of hacking their own likes or dislike to make the video look more popular than it was.Last edited by ShinobuSensui; 03-14-2020 at 06:14 AM.
-
03-14-2020, 06:09 AM #100
-
-
03-14-2020, 08:09 AM #101
The intent was clear, and if it wasn't it was explained here thoroughly.
youtube.com/watch?v=1hh6dT3ffGA&t=15s
People clearly understood the message and that's why men and women have criticized it and it has so many downvotes. Nissan even chose to remove comments because it couldn't handle the backlash.
Nissan shot themselves in the foot with the ad and it's backfiring, business wise and brand wise. They should fire their marketing team.Last edited by ShinobuSensui; 03-14-2020 at 08:11 AM. Reason: Fixed link.
-
03-14-2020, 12:53 PM #102
-
03-14-2020, 12:56 PM #103
Men generally are much nicer to women, cut them more slack, are more willing to help them out etc. And men actually treat other men by their character. It's women who are bitches to other women and leeches to men. But they have no insight into their bad behavior because they act on emotion, not logic.
-
03-14-2020, 01:01 PM #104
it wasnt particularly alienating.
It came across more like an episode of a theme but this time with women as opposed to some political statement. Theres a difference there, its ok to empower ambitious women. Its not OK to try to demonize men to get there. (which was a major thesis in the Gillette one)
The male boss was also characterized enough in a goofy way that a man would be annoyed by him too, he looked like a dickhead boss which like I said, is a universal theme to both men and women, and the thesis could go for both men and women so there was a lot there that was fine. If it had been just a neutral looking white boss then it would have been worse, but since he was caricatured it was kind of reasonable. (maybe at worst making fun of dorky looking individuals.)
It was mostly about getting the powerup to believe in yourself as a overarching thesis which is ok.
Maybe the most suspicious element of the commercial is the timing and the nature of our current political climate surrounding it that effects our perception of their agenda. But in a vacuum I think its reasonably neutral.
-
-
03-14-2020, 02:29 PM #105
It's failing more and more though.
This commercial.
Gillette.
Charlie's Angels
Bird's of Prey,
etc.
It's taking a while but it's getting there.
I understand what you are saying to a degree. It wasn't as strong nosed in some ways as the other commercials. I think that makes it more effective (though not in this case) as the idea was to keep people from getting too offended like Gillette but it ultimately backfired. Although some people have argued the Gillette commercial was to empower men to "do better". Generally soyboys and feminists though.
Women and men have complained about the Nissan commercial and they have removed the comments and have a huge dislike ratio. Nissan is struggling with a 99% profit loss which makes this the last thing they needed from a business prospective. You want to get more customers and not lose your current ones as pleasing current customers is easier than having to get back angry ones. Also many women don't identify as feminist (even if they act like it) lol.
The behind the scenes stated it was about "sisterhood" and working in a "male dominated field". The message wasn't as anvil dropping as some other commercials, but it was intended to give the impression that she's behind held back because she's a woman.
The climate we're in now is a result of people getting annoyed with the ideology being pushed in media. We've had messages that were subtle in the past that showed men as buffoons too, nobody really said much about it until more recently.
In terms of not compromising men get held from promotions all of the time and don't get pushed up. Women don't deserve promotions just because they're women. People don't often get promoted because of layoffs or financial circumstances, or simply because they aren't good enough. Even taking the "male oppressor" part out of the message would make it a bad message as she would likely get fired for "not compromising".
A better approach would be to ask why she didn't get promoted and what she could do better. They took the beginning out and didn't explain why which makes it look like a gender issue. Especially when the behind the scenes specifically state that was their intent.
-
03-14-2020, 02:47 PM #106
meh, core message of the ad isn't too bad. the reason i say this is because at least they are trying to encourage women to seek out promotions and/or negotiate with their bosses rather than whining about the "sexist" pay gap, which in reality is partly accounted for by the fact that women tend not to negotiate their salaries as much as men do. so that part of the commercial isn't too bad, minus the employee's cringy and exaggerated walk at the end
on the other hand, brie larson is probably the most insufferable actress on the planet.
in sum: bad commercial overall because of larson, but its core message is way better than gillette's
-
03-14-2020, 02:55 PM #107
-
03-14-2020, 03:02 PM #108
-
-
03-14-2020, 05:01 PM #109
Bookmarks