Could the United States beat up every other country in the world...

[Brosnbroccoli]

is that what Fox news has been telling you?

Russia was literally a military state for decades, completely obsessed with national defence and paranoid to the max.

They spent every single penny of their economy on nukes lmfao.

I'm pretty sure their nukes work just fine.

Nah bruh. All their nukes are unfunctional. How do I know you ask? F-f-f-foxxx news told me.

Greatoldone flexing his double digit IQ ITT. Just lol

[GODself]

And tbh, even if it was possible to US to destroy all the world, you would die months later because you wouldnt have any country to trade with. Factories would go bankrupt... many unemployed... no money (cuz no exportations and no jobs)... civil war...everybody killing to eat. End of the world.


"Oh... but we would colonize the other countries and rule the globe..." No... cuz no people enough to do it (thats why portugal isnt a big country anymore, because we had no people to colonize the majority of the lands we "discovered" in XV century". Not to mention that other countries would be uninhabitable for years.

[GreatOldOne]

And tbh, even if it was possible to US to destroy all the world, you would die months later because you wouldnt have any country to trade with. Factories would go bankrupt... many unemployed... no money (cuz no exportations)... civil war...every body killing to eat. End of the world.

We would have jobs scrubbing the radiation of the ruins we made of other countries. Then, we would build biodomes and live there practicing for Mars.

We might even decide to nuke someone just so we can practice living under radiation.

[GODself]

We would have jobs scrubbing the radiation of the ruins we made of other countries. Then, we would build biodomes and live there practicing for Mars.

We might even decide to nuke someone just so we can practice living under radiation.

And how would you do it all without resources? (Remember, no importations)

[GreatOldOne]

Nah bruh. All their nukes are unfunctional. How do I know you ask? F-f-f-foxxx news told me.

Greatoldone flexing his double digit IQ ITT. Just lol

I'm a stable genius.

And I don't watch Fox.

I listen to military guys.

Who watch Fox lol but they also do interesting things.

And Russians who got fed up and left because it sucks. Hard.

[GreatOldOne]

And how would you do it all without resources? (Remember, no importations)

Are you suggesting that if you completely nuke a country you might not be able to live there successfully?

Challenge accepted.

[ronpaulusahero]

Yes.. I think its wild we allow countries like India and China to even have nukes

You didn't allow them anything. They made them without your approval.

[2RDEYE]

i think russia could destroy USA. wild guess though. all it takes is a couple nukes to cover USA while russia is a huge country

[ronpaulusahero]

Lol n.k. Troops would surrender faster than Iraqi military during desert storm. Their 50 year old second hand weapons are not very confident inspiring.

We can't even win a ground war in Afghanistan. WTF are you talking about taking NK? Do you remember how bloody the Korean war was?

[GreatOldOne]

ICBM's are not countered with other ICBM's.

ABM's are completely different missiles. Firing all ( or most ) of your ICBM's have no effect on your defensive capabilities.

We secretly pretended to stop making and developing these.

Brb Army "wrench"...100,000,000 dollars lol

[I3igAl]

Regular military weaponry: Superior navy combined with a great strategical position means yes. (unless some shortage of ressources like oil brings the US down)
Nukes: everyone loses
Fist Fight: US has no chance

[resoog]

Nazi Germany already tried this and we didn't like it

[Muzzlrpress]

If nukes do get involved though, US may or may not have a way to send payloads undetected. I can neither confirm or deny this.

[401Delta]

If nukes do get involved though, US may or may not have a way to send payloads undetected. I can neither confirm or deny this.

This is the reason that the State Department is always trying to allocate vacationing Americans spread throughout the world at all times, in case of an all out nuclear war and the mass destruction of entire countries and populations.

It's so they can reproduce and start colonizing again.

[EasyCheese89]

Hey op, Id fk u up easily in a fist fight. How bout that?

btw, the US would lose to many countries easily, without nukes of course. Serbia shot down a billion dollar stealth fighter with some retrofitted radars.

[rikugunchusa]

If nukes do get involved though, US may or may not have a way to send payloads undetected. I can neither confirm or deny this.

There's probably all kinds of **** the US can do that we don't know about

[crupiea]

We would have to nuke a couple of the big ones just to get rid of them, then we could handle the rest.

Couple submarines can handle that.

Think of China. if we cut them off fully from buying their junk they would collapse in short order. Of course it would suck for us too but whatever.

[AlwaysFocus]

Space would be unusable for satellites, earth would be polluted from many nuclear bombs. Probably most people die.

Survivors would be in bunkers most likely.

Be crazy to see the secret weapons that nobody knows about yet though.

[3Reich]

the armed forces? yes. normal citizens and miscers not a chance lol

You think the U.S. armed forces would beat every country in the world simultaneously?

[AWillis]

by 2030 - 70% of american's will be obese.

so if they want to have a fist fight. they better hurry up as it isnt looking good for victory in the future

[3Reich]

I mean technically probably Yes.

You think the U.S. armed forces would beat every country in the world simultaneously?

[AlwaysFocus]

We can't even win a ground war in Afghanistan. WTF are you talking about taking NK? Do you remember how bloody the Korean war was?

north korea was defeated almost then a million chinese crossed the border to help

[3Reich]

north korea was defeated almost then a million chinese crossed the border to help

This is true. You're right bruh. Your post also proves that we can't actually beat every country in the world simultaneously. I don't like insulting posters, but OP seems somewhat... unhinged.

[3Reich]

We figured out how to shoot down nukes. Our subs are better. Our airplanes are better. Our pilots are smarter. Our hackers are better. We have more flamethrowers and biological weapons. Our missiles literally work better and go in the right direction. We have more pitbulls. We have 300 million guns literally all over the place with autistic retards you trip over when you walk outside who spend all their free time shooting things.

We also have lasers and something that shoots a lightning bolt.

Edit: we can literally land on an asteroid and steer it into the ocean right next to their country.

And yet we hightailed it out of Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq. We lost thousands to camel desert dwellers. Are you guys serious when you say the U.S. can beat every country SIMULTANEOUSLY??? Of course 1 v 1, we are the best (pound for pound. We still wouldn't beat China or Russia in a war and they wouldn't beat us either. China has too many people).

[TurbanMon]

Yes, America has all the geographic advantages of both an island nation and resources of a continent. It's basically the cheat code nation

[TurbanMon]

And yet we hightailed it out of Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq. We lost thousands to camel desert dwellers. Are you guys serious when you say the U.S. can beat every country SIMULTANEOUSLY??? Of course 1 v 1, we are the best (pound for pound. We still wouldn't beat China or Russia in a war and they wouldn't beat us either. China has too many people).

If we're not interested in nation building or keeping a working governemnt in conquered nations, then America can raze these nations to dust without problem.

[TurbanMon]

Yes.. I think its wild we allow countries like India and China to even have nukes

I think you missed the part where we were planning to nuke China when they were developing theirs until we determined it wasn't a feasible one .

[GreatOldOne]

And yet we hightailed it out of Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq. We lost thousands to camel desert dwellers. Are you guys serious when you say the U.S. can beat every country SIMULTANEOUSLY??? Of course 1 v 1, we are the best (pound for pound. We still wouldn't beat China or Russia in a war and they wouldn't beat us either. China has too many people).

We actually were doing fine in Vietnam. Wrecked Korea all the way and decided we didn't want to nuke China, and blew up Iraq twice...once by mistake, got bored and left.

China has too many people? For what? We're not going over there and playing kung fu.

[Kawhilights]

All of you morons bringing up Vietnam and Afghanistan. Do you really think the US went all out? Our military could've easily gone scorched Earth on both of those countries and glassed them in a day.

EU members talking in this thread would do good to remember that they can focus on other aspects and underfund their military because big brother US keeps the likes of China and Russia in check. The day the US removes their protection you'd all be speaking Russian or Mandarin.

[EasyCheese89]

All of you morons bringing up Vietnam and Afghanistan. Do you really think the US went all out? Our military could've easily gone scorched Earth on both of those countries and glassed them in a day.

EU members talking in this thread would do good to remember that they can focus on other aspects and underfund their military because big brother US keeps the likes of China and Russia in check. The day the US removes their protection you'd all be speaking Russian or Mandarin.

You talk alot of chit for a guy who wood get whoop easily by a highschooler