1 dead, shooter in custody.
Is this worthy of all day national media attention?
No, not unless their goal is to increase the number/likelihood of more shootings like this - which is exactly why they're doing it.
|
-
11-14-2019, 11:27 AM #121
-
11-14-2019, 11:29 AM #122anonymousGuest
-
11-14-2019, 11:33 AM #123
Yea sally a paper by people who would be out of a job if gullible people didnt buy into their propoganda.
Fact. Emissions have risen temperature by .01 degree over the last 150 years
Fact, the ice caps melt and grow, no evidence its anything other than nature
Fact, your "scientists" are batting .000 on their climate change predictions
Just another gullible little pathetic troll who cant face facts
-
11-14-2019, 11:33 AM #124
-
-
11-14-2019, 11:34 AM #125
I have never really looked at the stats, but I'm sure it's the case. Is there a big correlation of mass shootings with the advent of social media? It seems like if these things weren't covered as much we would see less. The shooters always do this for attention and to get their message across. This is a case of not needing national coverage.
-
11-14-2019, 11:35 AM #126
it's telling that you left off the first sentence:
1 dead, shooter in custody, yet all national cable news channels are covering all day non-stop
Of course it's not a good idea to do that, nor is it legitimately worthy of that attention .... unless their goal is to increase the number/likelihood of more shootings like this - which is exactly why they're doing it.
-
11-14-2019, 11:39 AM #127
-
11-14-2019, 11:40 AM #128
-
-
11-14-2019, 11:41 AM #129
-
11-14-2019, 11:44 AM #130
-
11-14-2019, 11:45 AM #131
-
11-14-2019, 11:55 AM #132
-
-
11-14-2019, 11:57 AM #133
-
11-14-2019, 11:57 AM #134
-
11-14-2019, 11:58 AM #135
-
11-14-2019, 11:59 AM #136
-
-
11-14-2019, 12:05 PM #137
-
11-14-2019, 12:05 PM #138
-
11-14-2019, 12:05 PM #139
What specific problem do you have with the research methodology of the paper? Which type of climate models have you studied to assess their prediction accuracy?
The linear regression studies into warming since the 1950s have unanimously found that human activity responsible for the majority of global temperature increases since. Here's a good recent one:
https://link.springer.com/article/10...382-016-3079-6
Can you explain the problems you see with the above linear regression model?Misc Crypto Crew
BTC to $200k
-
11-14-2019, 12:07 PM #140
-
-
11-14-2019, 12:09 PM #141
-
11-14-2019, 12:09 PM #142
-
11-14-2019, 12:10 PM #143
No we wanted to arm teachers and many states have done so, when texas and ohio offered free ccw classes to teachers the wait list was 6 months long. Teachers were lining up. Democrats, like in CA instead passed a law that disarmed teachers. Up until the law was passed school superintendents were allowed to authorize their teachers to carry. The democrats removed that right and now children are dead. Did this 15 year old drive into another state and buy a gun? No he didnt. Gun laws only create easy victims as is proven over and over yet you demotards keep pushing to disarm law abiding citizens
-
11-14-2019, 12:11 PM #144
-
-
11-14-2019, 12:12 PM #145
- Join Date: Jan 2008
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Posts: 15,000
- Rep Power: 58598
That's a lie and you know it. The pro gun crowd has offered several possible solutions.
And this might actually be more effective than passing laws (although they should still be passed).
You keep saying we need to pass more laws but you can't give me a single law that would prevent these shootings.I would die for Palestine
-
11-14-2019, 12:12 PM #146
And yet they have 4x the violent crime rate of the US, they also dont have over 100k lives saved by guns like the US does. Instead you bend over and take it and hope you dont get killed. Oh and if you do defend yourself you go to jail
Pathetic. Take your slavery. Ill keep my guns and defend myself and my family
-
11-14-2019, 12:14 PM #147
-
11-14-2019, 12:15 PM #148
-
-
11-14-2019, 12:19 PM #149
-
11-14-2019, 12:22 PM #150
That is not what the research shows, Mimsy, that's a figure you plucked out of your ass like everything you've posted so far. There is a linear regression study I linked for you above that finds human CO2 emissions to be the driving force in temperature increase in the past half century, consistent with all the other studies examining this same effect. Do you know what these words mean? Have you considered asking the little girl in your avi to explain them to you?
Misc Crypto Crew
BTC to $200k
Bookmarks