Impeachment 'Dead on Arrival' in Senate

[401Delta]

Just LOL at the Dems firing blanks.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., accused House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., of not caring about the truth, and said Schiff's impeachment efforts will go nowhere unless he calls the anonymous whistleblower to come forward and testify about their complaint against President Trump.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sen...ower-testimony

[XterraRob]

Why is Schiff trying so desperately to bring down Trump? What is Schiff afraid of?

[401Delta]

What is Schiff afraid of?

Pencil sharpeners would be my guess.

[GreatOldOne]

It won't be stillborn, but rather die an early gruesome death everyone has to watch.

[scheal]

It won't be stillborn, but rather die an early gruesome death everyone has to watch.

It will be probably be the best comedy show this year. Something we will have re runs year after year over thanksgiving. We can all picture yourself and sillie having tremor fits over

[401Delta]

It won't be stillborn, but rather die an early gruesome death everyone has to watch.

It'll go something like this:

Some liberal senator: "Mr. Chairman, I propose that we take up the issue of impeachment."
Lindsay Graham: "No, I don't think so."

I hope you didn't buy a lot of popcorn.

[ghostfacedup]

Yup. It shouldn't even go to the Senate.

[Roldz]

Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter

[Trapstar4.4]

Nobody is worried about


The major thought right now is around how the public will digest the public testimony. Public sentiment is everything. And pls learn not to trust what a congressman says esp when their jobs are at stake.
What they tell you now means nothing until after the hearings

[chaunce54]

It won't be stillborn, but rather die an early gruesome death everyone has to watch.

lol, it's unlikely it will ever reach the Senate to begin with.

[Thankless]

Nobody is worried about


The major thought right now is around how the public will digest the public testimony. Public sentiment is everything. And pls learn not to trust what a congressman says esp when their jobs are at stake.
What they tell you now means nothing until after the hearings

Let's be honest, most of the public will digest it however the media wants them to digest it.

[Noliberals4]

Let's be honest, most of the public will digest it however the media wants them to digest it.

Blame the media and not Trump. OK.

90% of Trump criticism is because of HIM.

[BeReRkER]

Thats excellent news. Crush all communist scum always and everywhere.

[NitrogenWidget]

Nobody is worried about


The major thought right now is around how the public will digest the public testimony. Public sentiment is everything. And pls learn not to trust what a congressman says esp when their jobs are at stake.
What they tell you now means nothing until after the hearings

the general public (moderates and the only demographic that really matters politically) historically dislike impeachment.
I don't see how this will be any different.

[SillieBazzillie]

The sound bites of patriots testifying to Trump’s abuse of power and QPQ will be glorious. Buh bye suburbs that Trump previously won.

[BullittEV]

Blame the media and not Trump. OK.

90% of Trump criticism is because of HIM.

Yeah, the media is barely at fault.

Fukking idiot, they are the most divisive piece of the political puzzle.

[rhadam]

Nobody is worried about


The major thought right now is around how the public will digest the public testimony. Public sentiment is everything. And pls learn not to trust what a congressman says esp when their jobs are at stake.
What they tell you now means nothing until after the hearings

What is discovered during testimony, and what is reported by the media are two completely different things.

[GeekBrah]

Why is Schiff trying so desperately to bring down Trump? What is Schiff afraid of?

He must be on the communist china payroll. The commies are getting desperate.

[Trapstar4.4]

the general public (moderates and the only demographic that really matters politically) historically dislike impeachment.
I don't see how this will be any different.

thats fine. but what i said was spot on. and this has to happen. from dems perspective, backing down means that they lose their base. this has to happen so fear mongering with "ooh they wont like impeachment" is moot.

without your base you are nothing. ask trump, he knows that best

What is discovered during testimony, and what is reported by the media are two completely different things.

again, public sentiment is public sentiment. and will drive congressional decisions

[TaeBoNinja]

thats fine. but what i said was spot on. and this has to happen. from dems perspective, backing down means that they lose their base. this has to happen so fear mongering with "ooh they wont like impeachment" is moot.

without your base you are nothing. ask trump, he knows that best

I agree they're doing this for their base, but the Dem base is stupid. This only helps Trump. Every short-coming he's had the past 3 years will be looked over by his base now. Trying to take away people's vote right before an election is madness.

[Dorich]

The people who want to impeach Trump are the same people who want to destroy America.

[Mark1T]

Why is Schiff trying so desperately to bring down Trump? What is Schiff afraid of?

His entire reputation, what's left of it, is hanging on this. So, as he always has done, he will lie and fabricate to Congress and to the American people.

After this charade is over, I hope the dems will ask for his head.

[Mckay23]

Nobody is worried about


The major thought right now is around how the public will digest the public testimony. Public sentiment is everything. And pls learn not to trust what a congressman says esp when their jobs are at stake.
What they tell you now means nothing until after the hearings

Public testimony? No.

Democrats must approve any requests submitted by Republicans and they are expected to reject the requests for the whistleblower to appear.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/09/polit...ex.html/quote]

[semitope]

last week they complain about closed hearings. now they will get public hearings he says he won't read the transcripts and doesn't care what the witnesses say. Now he asks for the whistleblower, what do you think he will say if the whistle blower testifies? he doesn't care about the testimony of the folks with first hand knowledge of the ukraine plot, so why would he care about the whistleblower? they don't care at all and their only goal is to defend trump no matter what.

he might just be asking for this because he knows the whistleblower identity is to be secret. maybe its because trump wants to know.

"The call to have my client's identity disclosed will fundamentally harm a process that took decades to build. By extension, it will adversely impact Congressional oversight. These consequences, I fear, will be long-lasting," Bakaj said. "If Congress and others do not protect my client's anonymity -- which my client is afforded to by law -- not only does it jeopardize their safety, but it jeopardizes an entire system that took decades to build. It will destroy effective Congressional oversight for years to come. This is what is at stake. It is time for Members of Congress and our government leaders to internalize this fact."

this is why i suspect blackmail targeting republicans. seems there's nothing they won't destroy to defend trump and they know better

[GreatOldOne]

It'll go something like this:

Some liberal senator: "Mr. Chairman, I propose that we take up the issue of impeachment."
Lindsay Graham: "No, I don't think so."

I hope you didn't buy a lot of popcorn.

For my birthday this year, dead srs, I got this really nice popcorn maker where you make it on the stovetop. It came with a recipe of salt and oil and you hand crank it.

It's just as good if not better than the movies.

It was from Amazon pm if interested I'll tell you srs.

[KINGFABIAN]

Welp, 401Delta made this thread so time to contact congress and let them know daddy did no wrong - call off the investigation/








Lmao at the amount of crying and more posting from them in the weeks to come - just L O L

[GreatOldOne]

lol, it's unlikely it will ever reach the Senate to begin with.

Idk about that one. There is no reason to turn back.

[TaeBoNinja]

last week they complain about closed hearings. now they will get public hearings he says he won't read the transcripts and doesn't care what the witnesses say. Now he asks for the whistleblower, what do you think he will say if the whistle blower testifies? he doesn't care about the testimony of the folks with first hand knowledge of the ukraine plot, so why would he care about the whistleblower? they don't care at all and their only goal is to defend trump no matter what.

he might just be asking for this because he knows the whistleblower identity is to be secret. maybe its because trump wants to know.



this is why i suspect blackmail targeting republicans. seems there's nothing they won't destroy to defend trump and they know better

THis is nonense. Dems wanted the transcripts, and Trump released them. The only thing the GOP is aksing is for the whisteblower to tesitfy. The Dems don't want that because they know he'll be asked about meeting with Schiif and the conspriacy to gin this whole thing up. His name isn't secret, hasn't been for weeks. Nor does the whisteblower policy potect it, it's supposed to protect employment.

[TaeBoNinja]

Idk about that one. There is no reason to turn back.

You turn back because it sinks the Dems 2020 chances. But maybe Pelosi is fine with that. Speakers love going against an opposing party president.

[EctoCanuck]

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., accused House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., of not caring about the truth, and said Schiff's impeachment efforts will go nowhere unless he calls the anonymous whistleblower to come forward and testify about their complaint against President Trump.