I'm liking her more and more. If not Sanders, i'd support Warren. Sanders/Warren 2020.
Warren’s bold plan to crack down on corruption in Washington, explained.
https://www.vox.com/2019/9/16/208672...orruption-bill
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) just previewed the first major piece of legislation she’d try to pass through Congress if elected president: a vast anti-corruption package to crack down on the entrenched culture of lobbying in Washington, DC.
'Many previous attempts to pass anti-corruption laws have focused on Congress or the executive branch, but Warren’s plan would up transparency requirements for the judicial branch as well. She’d extend the code of conduct for federal judges to those on the US Supreme Court (they’re currently exempt). Warren’s plan would also make it so that federal judges under investigation couldn’t escape inquiries by stepping down from their posts.Here are the key points of Warren’s plan:
-A lifetime lobbying ban for presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress, federal judges, and Cabinet secretaries.
-Applying conflict-of-interest laws to the president and vice president, requiring them to place businesses into a blind trust to be sold off. They would also have to place assets that could present a conflict of interest — including real estate — in a blind trust and sell them off.
-Multi-year lobbying bans for federal employees (both Congressional staffers and employees of federal agencies). The span of time would be at least two years and six years for those wishing to become corporate lobbyists.
-Banning members of Congress and senior congressional staff from serving on corporate boards. The plan would also ban senior administration officials and members of Congress from serving on for-profit boards, no matter if they receive compensation for it or not.
-Ban lobbyists from all fundraising activities, including political fundraisers or campaign bundling, and strengthen criminal anti-corruption statutes by redefining an “official act” to make politicians unable to accept gifts or payments in exchange for government action.
-Requiring the IRS to release eight years of tax returns for all presidential and vice-presidential candidates as well as requiring them to release tax returns during each year in office. The IRS would also have to release two years of tax returns for members of Congress, and require them to release tax returns for each lawmaker’s year in office.
-Banning members of Congress, Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, White House staff, senior congressional staff, and other officials from owning or trading individual stocks while in office.
-Changing the rulemaking process of federal agencies to severely restrict the ability of corporations or industry to delay or influence rulemaking. Warren’s plan would restrict studies funded by groups with conflict-of-interest problems being considered in the rulemaking process, unless they go under a lengthy peer review.
-Broadening the definition of a “thing of value” in campaign finance laws to go beyond money. Under the new definition, it could include opposition research from foreign governments.
-Creating a new independent US Office of Public Integrity, which would enforce the nation’s ethics laws and investigate any potential violations. The office would also try to strengthen open records laws, making records more easily accessible to the public and the press.
-Banning forced arbitration clauses and class action waivers for all employment, consumer protection, antitrust, and civil rights cases.
-Boosting transparency in certain court cases by prohibiting courts from using sealed settlements to conceal evidence in cases that involve public health or safety.
“Our federal court system only works if the American people have faith that it is neutrally dispensing fair-minded justice without bias or personal interests interfering in judicial decisions,” Warren said. “If we want the American people to believe this, we need some serious judicial ethics reforms.”'
|
-
09-16-2019, 07:52 AM #1
Elizabeth Warren’s first priority as president: ending government corruption
-
09-16-2019, 07:54 AM #2
-
09-16-2019, 07:56 AM #3
-
09-16-2019, 07:57 AM #4
-
-
09-16-2019, 07:58 AM #5
-
09-16-2019, 08:00 AM #6
-
09-16-2019, 08:01 AM #7
She did release a similar bill in August 2018 according to the article. As to your question:
if Warren were elected president and House Democrats hung onto their majority in 2020, she’d have a willing partner to try to get this legislation passed. Of course, the bill’s future would depend on whether Democrats could also take back the Senate; current Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has vowed to be the “grim reaper” of HR 1 as well as a number of other Democratic policy priorities.
Warren may be able to enact some of these changes through executive action. But in order to enact as broad a plan as she envisions — one that touches all three branches of government — she’d need buy-in from the House and Senate.
-
09-16-2019, 08:02 AM #8
-
-
09-16-2019, 08:03 AM #9
-
09-16-2019, 08:06 AM #10
-
09-16-2019, 08:06 AM #11
-
09-16-2019, 08:06 AM #12
-
-
09-16-2019, 08:09 AM #13
-
09-16-2019, 08:10 AM #14
-
09-16-2019, 08:13 AM #15
-
09-16-2019, 08:18 AM #16
-
-
09-16-2019, 08:19 AM #17
-
09-16-2019, 08:21 AM #18
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 13,426
- Rep Power: 183847
-Creating a new independent US Office of Public Integrity, which would enforce the nation’s ethics laws and investigate any potential violations. The office would also try to strengthen open records laws, making records more easily accessible to the public and the press.
Just another level of bureaucracy that the politicians will use to **** over American citizens and do absolutely zero to fix any actual issues. And I bet it costs a lot of money to run, too!Best thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
-
09-16-2019, 08:25 AM #19
I am skeptical of the bureaucracy as well. But sometimes these independent agencies need to exist because there's nothing else that fill that role. For example we don't complain about internal affairs acting as oversight to the various police departments. We don't typically complain that they cost a lot of money because they serve a crucial role in society by policing the police.
I believe government should be effective and efficient, transparent and accountable. Working for the people, not a small group of capitalists with no allegiance to the country.
-
09-16-2019, 08:26 AM #20
-
-
09-16-2019, 08:32 AM #21
-
09-16-2019, 08:33 AM #22
-
09-16-2019, 08:40 AM #23
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 8,636
- Rep Power: 97513
Where did I say that was different? Politicians promise the world when they are campaigning. What Trump said was stupid. Same with Biden, Bernie and now Warren. Obama promised pretty much the same thing. Get rid of the lobbyists and have the most transparent presidency.
Politicians that have spent their entire life in congress and the senate have all these great plans but can only implement them if you vote them in as president.
Doesn’t sound like they are looking out for their current constituents.
Of topic. I can’t imagine how pathetic your life is to have such a strong interest in another countries politics.
-
09-16-2019, 08:42 AM #24
-
-
09-16-2019, 08:46 AM #25
I understand that you're disenfranchised because Trump lied to you, hasn't built a single mile of new fencing, hasn't secured the border, hasn't made America great again, etc. But sometimes politicians actually go through with what they campaign on, sometimes the establishment makes it harder (like Obama ending Gitmo, Trump building a wall).
Bernie Sanders fought against the free trade deals like NAFTA that sent over a million American jobs overseas and to Mexico so the corporations could maximize profits. Had people listened to Bernie, the economy would likely be doing far better now and far stronger as a foundation.
Miners union president: 'Coal's not back. Nobody saved the coal industry.'
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/05/polit...ack/index.html
In 2011 while speaking on the Senate floor, Bernie reminded his colleagues that Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) claimed in 1993 that “American firms will not move to Mexico just for lower wages.” Bernie then pointed out how over the next ten years after the passing of NAFTA, Mattel, Lexmark International, Texas Instruments, General Electric, Tyco Electronics, and Levi Strauss laid off a total of 3,176 employees and shifted their production to Mexico.
Recent reports and studies have shown that because of NAFTA Americans have lost over 680,000 jobs. One report estimates the job loss as a result of NAFTA is 950,000. A senior economist at EPI stated the following about the disastrous results from NAFTA: “The growing U.S. trade deficit with Mexico has displaced a large number of jobs in the United States and is a significant contributor to the current crisis in U.S. manufacturing, which lost 5.6 million jobs between February 2000 and February 2011.”
-
09-16-2019, 08:49 AM #26
-
09-16-2019, 08:50 AM #27
-
09-16-2019, 08:50 AM #28
-
-
09-16-2019, 08:52 AM #29
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 8,636
- Rep Power: 97513
-
09-16-2019, 08:53 AM #30
Bookmarks